Categorization principles of modal meaning categories: a critical assessment

This paper offers a critical analysis of the features used to define categories of modal meaning (expressed by modal verbs). First, Palmer’s (1990) and Huddleston and Pullum et al’s (2002) definition of dynamic modality is compared with the taxonomic approach to that area of modal meaning in Depraet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ilse Depraetere
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires du Midi 2015-07-01
Series:Anglophonia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/476
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579233278328832
author Ilse Depraetere
author_facet Ilse Depraetere
author_sort Ilse Depraetere
collection DOAJ
description This paper offers a critical analysis of the features used to define categories of modal meaning (expressed by modal verbs). First, Palmer’s (1990) and Huddleston and Pullum et al’s (2002) definition of dynamic modality is compared with the taxonomic approach to that area of modal meaning in Depraetere and Reed (2011) and Depraetere (2014). The next part of the paper is focussed on the ways in which deontic necessity is defined in Huddleston and Pullum et al (2002), Van der Auwera and Plungian (1998), Coates (1983). Finally, the defining features of the category of dynamic implication are analysed. The discussion is meant to make explicit and assess the diverse strategies used to delineate categories of modal meaning. Some principles of methodological good practice are put forward.
format Article
id doaj-art-5312d05221f2453bb3030e9b0b566567
institution Kabale University
issn 1278-3331
2427-0466
language English
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Presses Universitaires du Midi
record_format Article
series Anglophonia
spelling doaj-art-5312d05221f2453bb3030e9b0b5665672025-01-30T12:32:53ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662015-07-011910.4000/anglophonia.476Categorization principles of modal meaning categories: a critical assessmentIlse DepraetereThis paper offers a critical analysis of the features used to define categories of modal meaning (expressed by modal verbs). First, Palmer’s (1990) and Huddleston and Pullum et al’s (2002) definition of dynamic modality is compared with the taxonomic approach to that area of modal meaning in Depraetere and Reed (2011) and Depraetere (2014). The next part of the paper is focussed on the ways in which deontic necessity is defined in Huddleston and Pullum et al (2002), Van der Auwera and Plungian (1998), Coates (1983). Finally, the defining features of the category of dynamic implication are analysed. The discussion is meant to make explicit and assess the diverse strategies used to delineate categories of modal meaning. Some principles of methodological good practice are put forward.https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/476taxonomies of modal meaningdynamic modalitydeontic necessitydynamic implicationcategorisation
spellingShingle Ilse Depraetere
Categorization principles of modal meaning categories: a critical assessment
Anglophonia
taxonomies of modal meaning
dynamic modality
deontic necessity
dynamic implication
categorisation
title Categorization principles of modal meaning categories: a critical assessment
title_full Categorization principles of modal meaning categories: a critical assessment
title_fullStr Categorization principles of modal meaning categories: a critical assessment
title_full_unstemmed Categorization principles of modal meaning categories: a critical assessment
title_short Categorization principles of modal meaning categories: a critical assessment
title_sort categorization principles of modal meaning categories a critical assessment
topic taxonomies of modal meaning
dynamic modality
deontic necessity
dynamic implication
categorisation
url https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/476
work_keys_str_mv AT ilsedepraetere categorizationprinciplesofmodalmeaningcategoriesacriticalassessment