Socket Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Free Gingival Grafts

ABSTRACT: Objective: The present randomised controlled trial is based on the null hypothesis that there is no difference in crestal bone levels (CBLs) following socket preservation (SP) using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and free gingival graft (FGG). The aim was to evaluate CBLs following SP using P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haya Hesham Abdel-Latif Afifi, Shaimaa Saieed Nasr, Munerah Saleh BinShabaib, Shatha Subhi Alharthi, Mona Shoeib
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:International Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653924001576
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592785328308224
author Haya Hesham Abdel-Latif Afifi
Shaimaa Saieed Nasr
Munerah Saleh BinShabaib
Shatha Subhi Alharthi
Mona Shoeib
author_facet Haya Hesham Abdel-Latif Afifi
Shaimaa Saieed Nasr
Munerah Saleh BinShabaib
Shatha Subhi Alharthi
Mona Shoeib
author_sort Haya Hesham Abdel-Latif Afifi
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: Objective: The present randomised controlled trial is based on the null hypothesis that there is no difference in crestal bone levels (CBLs) following socket preservation (SP) using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and free gingival graft (FGG). The aim was to evaluate CBLs following SP using PRF and FGG. Methods: This study is a parallel-arm randomised controlled trial. Patients in the test and control groups underwent SP using PRF and FGG, respectively. Intraoral visual examination was performed to clinically assess signs of swelling, pus/abscess, and stability of sutures and graft. Self-rated postoperative pain was assessed after 1 week and 6 months using the visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 6-month follow-up, cone-beam computed tomography was performed to evaluate CBL in mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions. The preoperative cone-beam computed tomographic images were superimposed with those taken at the 6-month follow-up to compare CBLs. Statistical comparisons were performed and level of significance was set at P < .05. Results: The test and control groups each comprised 13 individuals with comparable ages. All teeth included in the test and control groups were located in the maxillary aesthetic zone. At the 1-week follow-up, VAS scores were higher in the control than in the test group (P < .01). At the 6-month follow-up, none of the participants reported self-rated pain. The change in buccolingual dimension was greater in the control group than in the test group (P < .05). Conclusions: Both FGG and PRF are effective techniques for SP; however, the latter technique is more effcacious in maintaining buccolingual dimensions of the extraction socket.
format Article
id doaj-art-52fc347463954277a97c429d3a4f6df1
institution Kabale University
issn 0020-6539
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Dental Journal
spelling doaj-art-52fc347463954277a97c429d3a4f6df12025-01-21T04:12:42ZengElsevierInternational Dental Journal0020-65392025-02-01751345351Socket Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Free Gingival GraftsHaya Hesham Abdel-Latif Afifi0Shaimaa Saieed Nasr1Munerah Saleh BinShabaib2Shatha Subhi Alharthi3Mona Shoeib4Faculty of Dentistry, Modern Science and Arts University, Cairo, EgyptOral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt; Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, 6th. Of October for Modern Science and Arts Univeristy, Cairo, EygptDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Corresponding author. Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaOral Medicine and Periodontology Departments, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptABSTRACT: Objective: The present randomised controlled trial is based on the null hypothesis that there is no difference in crestal bone levels (CBLs) following socket preservation (SP) using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and free gingival graft (FGG). The aim was to evaluate CBLs following SP using PRF and FGG. Methods: This study is a parallel-arm randomised controlled trial. Patients in the test and control groups underwent SP using PRF and FGG, respectively. Intraoral visual examination was performed to clinically assess signs of swelling, pus/abscess, and stability of sutures and graft. Self-rated postoperative pain was assessed after 1 week and 6 months using the visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 6-month follow-up, cone-beam computed tomography was performed to evaluate CBL in mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions. The preoperative cone-beam computed tomographic images were superimposed with those taken at the 6-month follow-up to compare CBLs. Statistical comparisons were performed and level of significance was set at P < .05. Results: The test and control groups each comprised 13 individuals with comparable ages. All teeth included in the test and control groups were located in the maxillary aesthetic zone. At the 1-week follow-up, VAS scores were higher in the control than in the test group (P < .01). At the 6-month follow-up, none of the participants reported self-rated pain. The change in buccolingual dimension was greater in the control group than in the test group (P < .05). Conclusions: Both FGG and PRF are effective techniques for SP; however, the latter technique is more effcacious in maintaining buccolingual dimensions of the extraction socket.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653924001576Alveolar ridgeExtractionFree gingival graftSocket preservationPlatelet-rich fibrin
spellingShingle Haya Hesham Abdel-Latif Afifi
Shaimaa Saieed Nasr
Munerah Saleh BinShabaib
Shatha Subhi Alharthi
Mona Shoeib
Socket Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Free Gingival Grafts
International Dental Journal
Alveolar ridge
Extraction
Free gingival graft
Socket preservation
Platelet-rich fibrin
title Socket Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Free Gingival Grafts
title_full Socket Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Free Gingival Grafts
title_fullStr Socket Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Free Gingival Grafts
title_full_unstemmed Socket Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Free Gingival Grafts
title_short Socket Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Free Gingival Grafts
title_sort socket preservation using platelet rich fibrin and free gingival grafts
topic Alveolar ridge
Extraction
Free gingival graft
Socket preservation
Platelet-rich fibrin
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653924001576
work_keys_str_mv AT hayaheshamabdellatifafifi socketpreservationusingplateletrichfibrinandfreegingivalgrafts
AT shaimaasaieednasr socketpreservationusingplateletrichfibrinandfreegingivalgrafts
AT munerahsalehbinshabaib socketpreservationusingplateletrichfibrinandfreegingivalgrafts
AT shathasubhialharthi socketpreservationusingplateletrichfibrinandfreegingivalgrafts
AT monashoeib socketpreservationusingplateletrichfibrinandfreegingivalgrafts