On the Difficulty of Refuting or Confirming the Arguments about the Caste System
Any attempt to understand Indian society through the scholarship on caste confronts us with a large number of problems. Scholars of the last 150 years have routinely observed and even criticised writings on caste for these problems. Such criticisms, however, have neither led us towards a confirmati...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ces |
| Published: |
University of Pardubice
2016-03-01
|
| Series: | Theatrum Historiae |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://theatrum.upce.cz/index.php/theatrum/article/view/2046 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832586996919304192 |
|---|---|
| author | Dunkin Jalki Sufiya Pathan |
| author_facet | Dunkin Jalki Sufiya Pathan |
| author_sort | Dunkin Jalki |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Any attempt to understand Indian society through the scholarship on caste confronts us with a large number of problems. Scholars of the last 150 years have routinely observed and even criticised writings on caste for these problems. Such criticisms, however, have neither led us towards a confirmation nor the abandonment of the so-called caste theories. How do we explain this curious fact? Caste scholars hold the complexity of the issue as responsible for the lack of a robust theory of the caste system. Hence, they set out to collect more facts in order to buttress the theory. More facts, however, create more problems. It is not only the quest for more data, which is expected to save the ‘theories’ of the caste system, but also a struggle to match the thus collected field data with the claims about the caste system that unites the colonial and modern writers on the caste system. This paper suggests that the failure of caste scholars to account for field data is not a result of the complexity of the field, but rather an outcome of the kind of entity that the ‘caste system’ is. The so-called caste system is an experiential entity of the West, which can neither be confirmed nor refuted by using empirical facts from India. Any attempt to do so will only generate unproductive debates.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-52e9e32031444741b2124a64a7e0bc4a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1802-2502 2571-0621 |
| language | ces |
| publishDate | 2016-03-01 |
| publisher | University of Pardubice |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Theatrum Historiae |
| spelling | doaj-art-52e9e32031444741b2124a64a7e0bc4a2025-01-24T18:28:34ZcesUniversity of PardubiceTheatrum Historiae1802-25022571-06212016-03-0117On the Difficulty of Refuting or Confirming the Arguments about the Caste SystemDunkin Jalki0Sufiya Pathan1SDM College Ujire, IndiaSDM College Ujire, India Any attempt to understand Indian society through the scholarship on caste confronts us with a large number of problems. Scholars of the last 150 years have routinely observed and even criticised writings on caste for these problems. Such criticisms, however, have neither led us towards a confirmation nor the abandonment of the so-called caste theories. How do we explain this curious fact? Caste scholars hold the complexity of the issue as responsible for the lack of a robust theory of the caste system. Hence, they set out to collect more facts in order to buttress the theory. More facts, however, create more problems. It is not only the quest for more data, which is expected to save the ‘theories’ of the caste system, but also a struggle to match the thus collected field data with the claims about the caste system that unites the colonial and modern writers on the caste system. This paper suggests that the failure of caste scholars to account for field data is not a result of the complexity of the field, but rather an outcome of the kind of entity that the ‘caste system’ is. The so-called caste system is an experiential entity of the West, which can neither be confirmed nor refuted by using empirical facts from India. Any attempt to do so will only generate unproductive debates. https://theatrum.upce.cz/index.php/theatrum/article/view/2046caste systemendogamyorientalismanti-clericalChristianity |
| spellingShingle | Dunkin Jalki Sufiya Pathan On the Difficulty of Refuting or Confirming the Arguments about the Caste System Theatrum Historiae caste system endogamy orientalism anti-clerical Christianity |
| title | On the Difficulty of Refuting or Confirming the Arguments about the Caste System |
| title_full | On the Difficulty of Refuting or Confirming the Arguments about the Caste System |
| title_fullStr | On the Difficulty of Refuting or Confirming the Arguments about the Caste System |
| title_full_unstemmed | On the Difficulty of Refuting or Confirming the Arguments about the Caste System |
| title_short | On the Difficulty of Refuting or Confirming the Arguments about the Caste System |
| title_sort | on the difficulty of refuting or confirming the arguments about the caste system |
| topic | caste system endogamy orientalism anti-clerical Christianity |
| url | https://theatrum.upce.cz/index.php/theatrum/article/view/2046 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dunkinjalki onthedifficultyofrefutingorconfirmingtheargumentsaboutthecastesystem AT sufiyapathan onthedifficultyofrefutingorconfirmingtheargumentsaboutthecastesystem |