Assessing Virus Survival in African Swine Fever Virus-Contaminated Materials—Implications for Indirect Virus Transmission

Introduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) into pig herds can occur via virus-contaminated feed or other objects. Knowledge about ASFV survival in different matrices and under different conditions is required to understand indirect virus transmission. Maintenance of ASFV infectivity can occur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina Marie Lazov, Ann Sofie Olesen, Graham J. Belsham, Anette Bøtner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/17/1/63
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587352631934976
author Christina Marie Lazov
Ann Sofie Olesen
Graham J. Belsham
Anette Bøtner
author_facet Christina Marie Lazov
Ann Sofie Olesen
Graham J. Belsham
Anette Bøtner
author_sort Christina Marie Lazov
collection DOAJ
description Introduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) into pig herds can occur via virus-contaminated feed or other objects. Knowledge about ASFV survival in different matrices and under different conditions is required to understand indirect virus transmission. Maintenance of ASFV infectivity can occur for extended periods outside pigs. Current assays detecting ASFV have inherent disadvantages. Cell culture-based assays are labor-intensive and sensitive to contaminants while methods using qPCR detect ASFV DNA with high sensitivity and specificity, but this may not correspond to infectious virus. Here, we have combined the use of these assays to assess the replication of ASFV within cells and determined the effect of pig feces, straw, wood shavings, and mixed feed on ASFV infectivity. In porcine serum, infectious ASFV survived for at least 60 days at 4 °C, 22 °C, and 37 °C; for two days at 50 °C; one day at 60 °C; and ≤5 min at 70 °C. In the presence of feed, straw, or wood shavings, the survival of the virus wasmarkedly shortened. Samples remained positive in the qPCR assay despite the loss of virus infectivity. Thus, it was possible to distinguish between the presence of ASFV DNA and the survival of the infectious virus.
format Article
id doaj-art-51af5a1acbc340b7bc034e5f25e378eb
institution Kabale University
issn 1999-4915
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Viruses
spelling doaj-art-51af5a1acbc340b7bc034e5f25e378eb2025-01-24T13:52:27ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152025-01-011716310.3390/v17010063Assessing Virus Survival in African Swine Fever Virus-Contaminated Materials—Implications for Indirect Virus TransmissionChristina Marie Lazov0Ann Sofie Olesen1Graham J. Belsham2Anette Bøtner3Section for Veterinary Clinical Microbiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg, DenmarkSection for Veterinary Clinical Microbiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg, DenmarkSection for Veterinary Clinical Microbiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg, DenmarkSection for Veterinary Clinical Microbiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg, DenmarkIntroduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) into pig herds can occur via virus-contaminated feed or other objects. Knowledge about ASFV survival in different matrices and under different conditions is required to understand indirect virus transmission. Maintenance of ASFV infectivity can occur for extended periods outside pigs. Current assays detecting ASFV have inherent disadvantages. Cell culture-based assays are labor-intensive and sensitive to contaminants while methods using qPCR detect ASFV DNA with high sensitivity and specificity, but this may not correspond to infectious virus. Here, we have combined the use of these assays to assess the replication of ASFV within cells and determined the effect of pig feces, straw, wood shavings, and mixed feed on ASFV infectivity. In porcine serum, infectious ASFV survived for at least 60 days at 4 °C, 22 °C, and 37 °C; for two days at 50 °C; one day at 60 °C; and ≤5 min at 70 °C. In the presence of feed, straw, or wood shavings, the survival of the virus wasmarkedly shortened. Samples remained positive in the qPCR assay despite the loss of virus infectivity. Thus, it was possible to distinguish between the presence of ASFV DNA and the survival of the infectious virus.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/17/1/63virus inactivationASFVvirus infectivityqPCR
spellingShingle Christina Marie Lazov
Ann Sofie Olesen
Graham J. Belsham
Anette Bøtner
Assessing Virus Survival in African Swine Fever Virus-Contaminated Materials—Implications for Indirect Virus Transmission
Viruses
virus inactivation
ASFV
virus infectivity
qPCR
title Assessing Virus Survival in African Swine Fever Virus-Contaminated Materials—Implications for Indirect Virus Transmission
title_full Assessing Virus Survival in African Swine Fever Virus-Contaminated Materials—Implications for Indirect Virus Transmission
title_fullStr Assessing Virus Survival in African Swine Fever Virus-Contaminated Materials—Implications for Indirect Virus Transmission
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Virus Survival in African Swine Fever Virus-Contaminated Materials—Implications for Indirect Virus Transmission
title_short Assessing Virus Survival in African Swine Fever Virus-Contaminated Materials—Implications for Indirect Virus Transmission
title_sort assessing virus survival in african swine fever virus contaminated materials implications for indirect virus transmission
topic virus inactivation
ASFV
virus infectivity
qPCR
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/17/1/63
work_keys_str_mv AT christinamarielazov assessingvirussurvivalinafricanswinefeverviruscontaminatedmaterialsimplicationsforindirectvirustransmission
AT annsofieolesen assessingvirussurvivalinafricanswinefeverviruscontaminatedmaterialsimplicationsforindirectvirustransmission
AT grahamjbelsham assessingvirussurvivalinafricanswinefeverviruscontaminatedmaterialsimplicationsforindirectvirustransmission
AT anettebøtner assessingvirussurvivalinafricanswinefeverviruscontaminatedmaterialsimplicationsforindirectvirustransmission