Comparison of IgA Endomysium Antibody and IgA Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody in Celiac Disease

The antigen for immunoglobulin (Ig)Aendomysium antibody (EmA), a sensitive and specific serological marker for celiac disease, has recently been described as tissue transglutaminase (tTG). The aim of this study was to compare the assays used to measure IgAEmAand IgA tTG antibody in patients wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen R Gillett, Hugh J Freeman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2000-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2000/598906
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547505410146304
author Helen R Gillett
Hugh J Freeman
author_facet Helen R Gillett
Hugh J Freeman
author_sort Helen R Gillett
collection DOAJ
description The antigen for immunoglobulin (Ig)Aendomysium antibody (EmA), a sensitive and specific serological marker for celiac disease, has recently been described as tissue transglutaminase (tTG). The aim of this study was to compare the assays used to measure IgAEmAand IgA tTG antibody in patients with celiac disease and disease control subjects. Sera from 21 patients with untreated celiac disease, 48 patients with treated celiac disease and 128 disease control subjects were tested both for IgA EmA with the use of indirect immunofluorescence against human umbilical cord and for IgA tTG antibody with the use of ELISA. Titres of IgA tTG antibody were significantly higher in both the untreated and treated celiac groups than in the disease control group. Titres in the treated group were, however, significantly lower than in the untreated group. A reference range was calculated to include 99.8% of the disease control group in whom small bowel biopsy showed no evidence of celiac disease. One patient from the disease control group with raised IgA tTG antibody titres and positive IgA EmA was found to have celiac disease on small bowel biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the IgA EmA assay were all 100%. The sensitivity of the IgA tTG antibody assay was 95%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 97.7%. An ELISA used to measure IgA tTG antibody is an excellent tool to screen for celiac disease and may prove useful for monitoring response to treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-51842f8211b948e5b8ce521ca50fe656
institution Kabale University
issn 0835-7900
language English
publishDate 2000-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
spelling doaj-art-51842f8211b948e5b8ce521ca50fe6562025-02-03T06:44:35ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology0835-79002000-01-0114866867110.1155/2000/598906Comparison of IgA Endomysium Antibody and IgA Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody in Celiac DiseaseHelen R Gillett0Hugh J Freeman1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaThe antigen for immunoglobulin (Ig)Aendomysium antibody (EmA), a sensitive and specific serological marker for celiac disease, has recently been described as tissue transglutaminase (tTG). The aim of this study was to compare the assays used to measure IgAEmAand IgA tTG antibody in patients with celiac disease and disease control subjects. Sera from 21 patients with untreated celiac disease, 48 patients with treated celiac disease and 128 disease control subjects were tested both for IgA EmA with the use of indirect immunofluorescence against human umbilical cord and for IgA tTG antibody with the use of ELISA. Titres of IgA tTG antibody were significantly higher in both the untreated and treated celiac groups than in the disease control group. Titres in the treated group were, however, significantly lower than in the untreated group. A reference range was calculated to include 99.8% of the disease control group in whom small bowel biopsy showed no evidence of celiac disease. One patient from the disease control group with raised IgA tTG antibody titres and positive IgA EmA was found to have celiac disease on small bowel biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the IgA EmA assay were all 100%. The sensitivity of the IgA tTG antibody assay was 95%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 97.7%. An ELISA used to measure IgA tTG antibody is an excellent tool to screen for celiac disease and may prove useful for monitoring response to treatment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2000/598906
spellingShingle Helen R Gillett
Hugh J Freeman
Comparison of IgA Endomysium Antibody and IgA Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody in Celiac Disease
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
title Comparison of IgA Endomysium Antibody and IgA Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody in Celiac Disease
title_full Comparison of IgA Endomysium Antibody and IgA Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody in Celiac Disease
title_fullStr Comparison of IgA Endomysium Antibody and IgA Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody in Celiac Disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of IgA Endomysium Antibody and IgA Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody in Celiac Disease
title_short Comparison of IgA Endomysium Antibody and IgA Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody in Celiac Disease
title_sort comparison of iga endomysium antibody and iga tissue transglutaminase antibody in celiac disease
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2000/598906
work_keys_str_mv AT helenrgillett comparisonofigaendomysiumantibodyandigatissuetransglutaminaseantibodyinceliacdisease
AT hughjfreeman comparisonofigaendomysiumantibodyandigatissuetransglutaminaseantibodyinceliacdisease