Political rhetoric used by the main parties in the final debate before the 1999 election
In order to identify the rhetorical characteristics of the participants, this study aimed to describe, interpret and evaluate the verbal strategies and tactics used by the five debaters who participated. The Eclectic Approach within the experiential perspective was used. Pahad revealed an idiosyncr...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Johannesburg
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Communicare |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1860 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832593770233724928 |
|---|---|
| author | Paul Schutte |
| author_facet | Paul Schutte |
| author_sort | Paul Schutte |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In order to identify the rhetorical characteristics of the participants, this study aimed
to describe, interpret and evaluate the verbal strategies and tactics used by the five
debaters who participated. The Eclectic Approach within the experiential perspective
was used.
Pahad revealed an idiosyncratic rhetorical style. Leon lived up to his party's overall
strategy: "To Fight Back". He mostly used the strategy of attack and pinpointed the
causes of identified problems in no uncertain terms. Van Schalkwyk appeared to be the
man with the facts. Of all the debaters, he made the most use of substantial evidence
and proof. Ngobane interacted very Little with his fellow debaters. This is in Line with
his view that opposition parties should rather "move towards consensus politics, ... but
not come and attack the government". Viljoen did not once identify himself with his
party. He created the image of the political advisor who stands above party politics.
Despite identified negative aspects of the debaters' style and the imperfect format,
debate should always be on the political agenda. Rigorous inquiry towards political
and moral truth should be at the core of the rhetoric of a democracy to improve the
quality of debating and argumentation, in order to enrich democracy and to allow
citizens to make well-informed decisions.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-510713fe806c4bdb86513d3578760662 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0259-0069 2957-7950 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | University of Johannesburg |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Communicare |
| spelling | doaj-art-510713fe806c4bdb86513d35787606622025-01-20T08:49:07ZengUniversity of JohannesburgCommunicare0259-00692957-79502022-10-0120210.36615/jcsa.v20i2.1860Political rhetoric used by the main parties in the final debate before the 1999 election Paul Schutte0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4255-877XUniversity of Pretoria In order to identify the rhetorical characteristics of the participants, this study aimed to describe, interpret and evaluate the verbal strategies and tactics used by the five debaters who participated. The Eclectic Approach within the experiential perspective was used. Pahad revealed an idiosyncratic rhetorical style. Leon lived up to his party's overall strategy: "To Fight Back". He mostly used the strategy of attack and pinpointed the causes of identified problems in no uncertain terms. Van Schalkwyk appeared to be the man with the facts. Of all the debaters, he made the most use of substantial evidence and proof. Ngobane interacted very Little with his fellow debaters. This is in Line with his view that opposition parties should rather "move towards consensus politics, ... but not come and attack the government". Viljoen did not once identify himself with his party. He created the image of the political advisor who stands above party politics. Despite identified negative aspects of the debaters' style and the imperfect format, debate should always be on the political agenda. Rigorous inquiry towards political and moral truth should be at the core of the rhetoric of a democracy to improve the quality of debating and argumentation, in order to enrich democracy and to allow citizens to make well-informed decisions. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1860idiosyncratic rhetorical styleattackfactssubstantial evidenceproofopposition parties |
| spellingShingle | Paul Schutte Political rhetoric used by the main parties in the final debate before the 1999 election Communicare idiosyncratic rhetorical style attack facts substantial evidence proof opposition parties |
| title | Political rhetoric used by the main parties in the final debate before the 1999 election |
| title_full | Political rhetoric used by the main parties in the final debate before the 1999 election |
| title_fullStr | Political rhetoric used by the main parties in the final debate before the 1999 election |
| title_full_unstemmed | Political rhetoric used by the main parties in the final debate before the 1999 election |
| title_short | Political rhetoric used by the main parties in the final debate before the 1999 election |
| title_sort | political rhetoric used by the main parties in the final debate before the 1999 election |
| topic | idiosyncratic rhetorical style attack facts substantial evidence proof opposition parties |
| url | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1860 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT paulschutte politicalrhetoricusedbythemainpartiesinthefinaldebatebeforethe1999election |