Nonoperative treatment efficacy prognosis in acute small bowell obstruction

Aim of investigation. Objective is to optimize treatment strategy for patients presenting with acute small bowell obstruction (SBO) due to adhesions. We developed a prognostic scale for conservative treatment outcome utilizing multiple prognostic factors.Methods. In retrospective study case records...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. G. Shapovalyants, S. Ye. Larichev, Z. A. Zhemukhova, N. A. Soldatova, I. A. Smirnov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Gastro LLC 2011-02-01
Series:Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/1370
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860191807930368
author S. G. Shapovalyants
S. Ye. Larichev
Z. A. Zhemukhova
N. A. Soldatova
I. A. Smirnov
author_facet S. G. Shapovalyants
S. Ye. Larichev
Z. A. Zhemukhova
N. A. Soldatova
I. A. Smirnov
author_sort S. G. Shapovalyants
collection DOAJ
description Aim of investigation. Objective is to optimize treatment strategy for patients presenting with acute small bowell obstruction (SBO) due to adhesions. We developed a prognostic scale for conservative treatment outcome utilizing multiple prognostic factors.Methods. In retrospective study case records of 385 patients for 2003–2008 have been analyzed. Patients with suspicion to strangulation were not included in investigation. According to the designed integrated prognostic system with application of Bayesian statistical methods patients have been distributed into three prognostic groups. Patients with low chances for conservative resolution of obstruction underwent surgery, i.e. adhesiolysis. Standard conservative therapy was carried out to patients with high chances. Conservative treatment that included endoscopic nasointestinal decompression (ENID) was prescribed to patients from the group of peer probability of obstruction resolution. Results. Prognostic system has been tested in 2009. During observation time 56 patients with SBO were admitted to the clinic, of them 13 were operated urgently and 43 were included into prospective study. Favourable results of standard conservative treatment were received in 68,7% of the cases (11 of 16 patients), ENID was effective in all 15 patients of this group and 22 patients with low likelihood of conservative resolution have been operated. The over-all mortality was 2,2% (1 patient of 43).Conclusion. The designed prognostic scale allows to prove with high accuracy the choice of SBO treatment method and to predict treatment outcome at this disease with high performance.
format Article
id doaj-art-50896e652213436eab8d684ffd803fd5
institution Kabale University
issn 1382-4376
2658-6673
language Russian
publishDate 2011-02-01
publisher Gastro LLC
record_format Article
series Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии
spelling doaj-art-50896e652213436eab8d684ffd803fd52025-02-10T16:14:31ZrusGastro LLCРоссийский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии1382-43762658-66732011-02-012115762922Nonoperative treatment efficacy prognosis in acute small bowell obstructionS. G. ShapovalyantsS. Ye. LarichevZ. A. ZhemukhovaN. A. SoldatovaI. A. SmirnovAim of investigation. Objective is to optimize treatment strategy for patients presenting with acute small bowell obstruction (SBO) due to adhesions. We developed a prognostic scale for conservative treatment outcome utilizing multiple prognostic factors.Methods. In retrospective study case records of 385 patients for 2003–2008 have been analyzed. Patients with suspicion to strangulation were not included in investigation. According to the designed integrated prognostic system with application of Bayesian statistical methods patients have been distributed into three prognostic groups. Patients with low chances for conservative resolution of obstruction underwent surgery, i.e. adhesiolysis. Standard conservative therapy was carried out to patients with high chances. Conservative treatment that included endoscopic nasointestinal decompression (ENID) was prescribed to patients from the group of peer probability of obstruction resolution. Results. Prognostic system has been tested in 2009. During observation time 56 patients with SBO were admitted to the clinic, of them 13 were operated urgently and 43 were included into prospective study. Favourable results of standard conservative treatment were received in 68,7% of the cases (11 of 16 patients), ENID was effective in all 15 patients of this group and 22 patients with low likelihood of conservative resolution have been operated. The over-all mortality was 2,2% (1 patient of 43).Conclusion. The designed prognostic scale allows to prove with high accuracy the choice of SBO treatment method and to predict treatment outcome at this disease with high performance.https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/1370acute adhesive smallintestinal obstructionprognostic factorsendoscopic nasointestinal decompression
spellingShingle S. G. Shapovalyants
S. Ye. Larichev
Z. A. Zhemukhova
N. A. Soldatova
I. A. Smirnov
Nonoperative treatment efficacy prognosis in acute small bowell obstruction
Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии
acute adhesive smallintestinal obstruction
prognostic factors
endoscopic nasointestinal decompression
title Nonoperative treatment efficacy prognosis in acute small bowell obstruction
title_full Nonoperative treatment efficacy prognosis in acute small bowell obstruction
title_fullStr Nonoperative treatment efficacy prognosis in acute small bowell obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Nonoperative treatment efficacy prognosis in acute small bowell obstruction
title_short Nonoperative treatment efficacy prognosis in acute small bowell obstruction
title_sort nonoperative treatment efficacy prognosis in acute small bowell obstruction
topic acute adhesive smallintestinal obstruction
prognostic factors
endoscopic nasointestinal decompression
url https://www.gastro-j.ru/jour/article/view/1370
work_keys_str_mv AT sgshapovalyants nonoperativetreatmentefficacyprognosisinacutesmallbowellobstruction
AT syelarichev nonoperativetreatmentefficacyprognosisinacutesmallbowellobstruction
AT zazhemukhova nonoperativetreatmentefficacyprognosisinacutesmallbowellobstruction
AT nasoldatova nonoperativetreatmentefficacyprognosisinacutesmallbowellobstruction
AT iasmirnov nonoperativetreatmentefficacyprognosisinacutesmallbowellobstruction