Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Objective. To identify outcomes of patients undergoing emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Background. Emergency TAVR has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for patients with decompensated severe aortic stenosis and/or regurg...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7598581 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832567229192863744 |
---|---|
author | Hans Huang Christopher P. Kovach Sean Bell Mark Reisman Gabriel Aldea James M. McCabe Danny Dvir Creighton Don |
author_facet | Hans Huang Christopher P. Kovach Sean Bell Mark Reisman Gabriel Aldea James M. McCabe Danny Dvir Creighton Don |
author_sort | Hans Huang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective. To identify outcomes of patients undergoing emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Background. Emergency TAVR has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for patients with decompensated severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation; however, data on patients undergoing emergency TAVR are limited. Methods. All emergency TAVR procedures were identified from a single tertiary academic center between January 2015 and August 2018. Results. 31 patients underwent emergency TAVR due to cardiogenic shock (26 patients), electrical instability with incessant ventricular tachycardia (2 patients), severe refractory angina (2 patients), and decompensated heart failure with hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (1 patient). Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was used in 16 (51.6%). MCS initiation occurred immediately prior to TAVR in 10 patients and placed post-TAVR in 6 patients. 6 patients died before hospital discharge (in-hospital mortality 19.4%). 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 61.0% and 55.9%, respectively. Univariate predictors of in-hospital mortality were preprocedural pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) ≤1.8 (66.7% vs. 20.0%, p=0.01), intraprocedural cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (83.3% vs 4.0%, p≤0.001), acute kidney injury post-TAVR (80.0% vs. 4.2%, p≤0.001), initiation of dialysis post-TAVR (60.0% vs. 4.2%, p≤0.001), and MCS initiation post-TAVR (50.0% vs. 12.0%, p=0.03). MCS initiation before TAVR was associated with improved survival compared with post-TAVR initiation. Conclusion. Emergency TAVR in extreme risk patients with acute decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock secondary to severe aortic valve disease is associated with high in-hospital mortality rates. Careful patient selection taking into account right heart function, assessed by PAPi, and early utilization of MCS may improve survival following emergency TAVR. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-507b17e9724547bb8c1fa7415e9d540e |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0896-4327 1540-8183 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
spelling | doaj-art-507b17e9724547bb8c1fa7415e9d540e2025-02-03T01:02:01ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832019-01-01201910.1155/2019/75985817598581Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementHans Huang0Christopher P. Kovach1Sean Bell2Mark Reisman3Gabriel Aldea4James M. McCabe5Danny Dvir6Creighton Don7Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, WA, Seattle, USADepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAObjective. To identify outcomes of patients undergoing emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Background. Emergency TAVR has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for patients with decompensated severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation; however, data on patients undergoing emergency TAVR are limited. Methods. All emergency TAVR procedures were identified from a single tertiary academic center between January 2015 and August 2018. Results. 31 patients underwent emergency TAVR due to cardiogenic shock (26 patients), electrical instability with incessant ventricular tachycardia (2 patients), severe refractory angina (2 patients), and decompensated heart failure with hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (1 patient). Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was used in 16 (51.6%). MCS initiation occurred immediately prior to TAVR in 10 patients and placed post-TAVR in 6 patients. 6 patients died before hospital discharge (in-hospital mortality 19.4%). 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 61.0% and 55.9%, respectively. Univariate predictors of in-hospital mortality were preprocedural pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) ≤1.8 (66.7% vs. 20.0%, p=0.01), intraprocedural cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (83.3% vs 4.0%, p≤0.001), acute kidney injury post-TAVR (80.0% vs. 4.2%, p≤0.001), initiation of dialysis post-TAVR (60.0% vs. 4.2%, p≤0.001), and MCS initiation post-TAVR (50.0% vs. 12.0%, p=0.03). MCS initiation before TAVR was associated with improved survival compared with post-TAVR initiation. Conclusion. Emergency TAVR in extreme risk patients with acute decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock secondary to severe aortic valve disease is associated with high in-hospital mortality rates. Careful patient selection taking into account right heart function, assessed by PAPi, and early utilization of MCS may improve survival following emergency TAVR.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7598581 |
spellingShingle | Hans Huang Christopher P. Kovach Sean Bell Mark Reisman Gabriel Aldea James M. McCabe Danny Dvir Creighton Don Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
title | Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_full | Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_short | Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
title_sort | outcomes of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7598581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanshuang outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT christopherpkovach outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT seanbell outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT markreisman outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT gabrielaldea outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT jamesmmccabe outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT dannydvir outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT creightondon outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement |