Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Objective. To identify outcomes of patients undergoing emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Background. Emergency TAVR has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for patients with decompensated severe aortic stenosis and/or regurg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hans Huang, Christopher P. Kovach, Sean Bell, Mark Reisman, Gabriel Aldea, James M. McCabe, Danny Dvir, Creighton Don
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7598581
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567229192863744
author Hans Huang
Christopher P. Kovach
Sean Bell
Mark Reisman
Gabriel Aldea
James M. McCabe
Danny Dvir
Creighton Don
author_facet Hans Huang
Christopher P. Kovach
Sean Bell
Mark Reisman
Gabriel Aldea
James M. McCabe
Danny Dvir
Creighton Don
author_sort Hans Huang
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To identify outcomes of patients undergoing emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Background. Emergency TAVR has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for patients with decompensated severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation; however, data on patients undergoing emergency TAVR are limited. Methods. All emergency TAVR procedures were identified from a single tertiary academic center between January 2015 and August 2018. Results. 31 patients underwent emergency TAVR due to cardiogenic shock (26 patients), electrical instability with incessant ventricular tachycardia (2 patients), severe refractory angina (2 patients), and decompensated heart failure with hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (1 patient). Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was used in 16 (51.6%). MCS initiation occurred immediately prior to TAVR in 10 patients and placed post-TAVR in 6 patients. 6 patients died before hospital discharge (in-hospital mortality 19.4%). 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 61.0% and 55.9%, respectively. Univariate predictors of in-hospital mortality were preprocedural pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) ≤1.8 (66.7% vs. 20.0%, p=0.01), intraprocedural cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (83.3% vs 4.0%, p≤0.001), acute kidney injury post-TAVR (80.0% vs. 4.2%, p≤0.001), initiation of dialysis post-TAVR (60.0% vs. 4.2%, p≤0.001), and MCS initiation post-TAVR (50.0% vs. 12.0%, p=0.03). MCS initiation before TAVR was associated with improved survival compared with post-TAVR initiation. Conclusion. Emergency TAVR in extreme risk patients with acute decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock secondary to severe aortic valve disease is associated with high in-hospital mortality rates. Careful patient selection taking into account right heart function, assessed by PAPi, and early utilization of MCS may improve survival following emergency TAVR.
format Article
id doaj-art-507b17e9724547bb8c1fa7415e9d540e
institution Kabale University
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-507b17e9724547bb8c1fa7415e9d540e2025-02-03T01:02:01ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832019-01-01201910.1155/2019/75985817598581Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementHans Huang0Christopher P. Kovach1Sean Bell2Mark Reisman3Gabriel Aldea4James M. McCabe5Danny Dvir6Creighton Don7Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, WA, Seattle, USADepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAObjective. To identify outcomes of patients undergoing emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Background. Emergency TAVR has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for patients with decompensated severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation; however, data on patients undergoing emergency TAVR are limited. Methods. All emergency TAVR procedures were identified from a single tertiary academic center between January 2015 and August 2018. Results. 31 patients underwent emergency TAVR due to cardiogenic shock (26 patients), electrical instability with incessant ventricular tachycardia (2 patients), severe refractory angina (2 patients), and decompensated heart failure with hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (1 patient). Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was used in 16 (51.6%). MCS initiation occurred immediately prior to TAVR in 10 patients and placed post-TAVR in 6 patients. 6 patients died before hospital discharge (in-hospital mortality 19.4%). 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 61.0% and 55.9%, respectively. Univariate predictors of in-hospital mortality were preprocedural pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) ≤1.8 (66.7% vs. 20.0%, p=0.01), intraprocedural cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (83.3% vs 4.0%, p≤0.001), acute kidney injury post-TAVR (80.0% vs. 4.2%, p≤0.001), initiation of dialysis post-TAVR (60.0% vs. 4.2%, p≤0.001), and MCS initiation post-TAVR (50.0% vs. 12.0%, p=0.03). MCS initiation before TAVR was associated with improved survival compared with post-TAVR initiation. Conclusion. Emergency TAVR in extreme risk patients with acute decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock secondary to severe aortic valve disease is associated with high in-hospital mortality rates. Careful patient selection taking into account right heart function, assessed by PAPi, and early utilization of MCS may improve survival following emergency TAVR.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7598581
spellingShingle Hans Huang
Christopher P. Kovach
Sean Bell
Mark Reisman
Gabriel Aldea
James M. McCabe
Danny Dvir
Creighton Don
Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_full Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_fullStr Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_short Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
title_sort outcomes of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7598581
work_keys_str_mv AT hanshuang outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT christopherpkovach outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT seanbell outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT markreisman outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT gabrielaldea outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT jamesmmccabe outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT dannydvir outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT creightondon outcomesofemergencytranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement