Issues concerning Landowner Management Plan Adoption Decisions: A Recursive Bivariate Probit Approach

Despite the likely benefits of having a written forest management plan, a small number of landowners in the United States have the one. A recursive bivariate probit model was used to identify the possible relationship between landowners’ decision to obtain a management plan and their interest in fut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omkar Joshi, Donald L. Grebner, Ian A. Munn, Robert K. Grala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:International Journal of Forestry Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/926303
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559827288588288
author Omkar Joshi
Donald L. Grebner
Ian A. Munn
Robert K. Grala
author_facet Omkar Joshi
Donald L. Grebner
Ian A. Munn
Robert K. Grala
author_sort Omkar Joshi
collection DOAJ
description Despite the likely benefits of having a written forest management plan, a small number of landowners in the United States have the one. A recursive bivariate probit model was used to identify the possible relationship between landowners’ decision to obtain a management plan and their interest in future timber harvesting. Our study results based on recursive bivariate model suggest that landowners having larger land ownerships, longer forest ownership tenure, and higher education were more likely to have a forest management plan and future timber harvesting interest. While the landowners having interest for wildlife management were also interested to have a written management plan, they did not prefer to harvest in future. Study results indicate that written management plan means more than a timber harvesting strategy to landowners in general. Many elderly landowners with a low level of income and less formal education and those having small or medium sized tracts of forestland are less likely to own a written management plan. Therefore, this group requires special attention in various government sponsored forest management related extension activities. Future research on understanding landowner perception behind written management plan is recommended.
format Article
id doaj-art-5012f3287ce24b19a0a5f54fbb17f0ca
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9368
1687-9376
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Forestry Research
spelling doaj-art-5012f3287ce24b19a0a5f54fbb17f0ca2025-02-03T01:29:08ZengWileyInternational Journal of Forestry Research1687-93681687-93762015-01-01201510.1155/2015/926303926303Issues concerning Landowner Management Plan Adoption Decisions: A Recursive Bivariate Probit ApproachOmkar Joshi0Donald L. Grebner1Ian A. Munn2Robert K. Grala3Texas A&M Forest Service, 200 Technology Way, College Station, TX 77845, USADepartment of Forestry, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 9681, Thompson Hall, MS 39762-9681, USADepartment of Forestry, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 9681, Thompson Hall, MS 39762-9681, USADepartment of Forestry, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 9681, Thompson Hall, MS 39762-9681, USADespite the likely benefits of having a written forest management plan, a small number of landowners in the United States have the one. A recursive bivariate probit model was used to identify the possible relationship between landowners’ decision to obtain a management plan and their interest in future timber harvesting. Our study results based on recursive bivariate model suggest that landowners having larger land ownerships, longer forest ownership tenure, and higher education were more likely to have a forest management plan and future timber harvesting interest. While the landowners having interest for wildlife management were also interested to have a written management plan, they did not prefer to harvest in future. Study results indicate that written management plan means more than a timber harvesting strategy to landowners in general. Many elderly landowners with a low level of income and less formal education and those having small or medium sized tracts of forestland are less likely to own a written management plan. Therefore, this group requires special attention in various government sponsored forest management related extension activities. Future research on understanding landowner perception behind written management plan is recommended.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/926303
spellingShingle Omkar Joshi
Donald L. Grebner
Ian A. Munn
Robert K. Grala
Issues concerning Landowner Management Plan Adoption Decisions: A Recursive Bivariate Probit Approach
International Journal of Forestry Research
title Issues concerning Landowner Management Plan Adoption Decisions: A Recursive Bivariate Probit Approach
title_full Issues concerning Landowner Management Plan Adoption Decisions: A Recursive Bivariate Probit Approach
title_fullStr Issues concerning Landowner Management Plan Adoption Decisions: A Recursive Bivariate Probit Approach
title_full_unstemmed Issues concerning Landowner Management Plan Adoption Decisions: A Recursive Bivariate Probit Approach
title_short Issues concerning Landowner Management Plan Adoption Decisions: A Recursive Bivariate Probit Approach
title_sort issues concerning landowner management plan adoption decisions a recursive bivariate probit approach
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/926303
work_keys_str_mv AT omkarjoshi issuesconcerninglandownermanagementplanadoptiondecisionsarecursivebivariateprobitapproach
AT donaldlgrebner issuesconcerninglandownermanagementplanadoptiondecisionsarecursivebivariateprobitapproach
AT ianamunn issuesconcerninglandownermanagementplanadoptiondecisionsarecursivebivariateprobitapproach
AT robertkgrala issuesconcerninglandownermanagementplanadoptiondecisionsarecursivebivariateprobitapproach