Enhancing patient engagement: the influence of an in-consult patient decision aid on shared decision-making for lung tumour radiation – protocol for the randomised trial ‘SDM Lung SBRT’

Introduction Patient engagement is continuously being promoted by patients as well as politicians and healthcare professionals. One way of increasing patient engagement is by using shared decision-making (SDM), which is a joint effort of clinicians and patients making decisions together.When plannin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karina Dahl Steffensen, Signe Timm, Torben Frøstrup Hansen, Thomas Leth Fink, Charlotte Kristiansen, Torben Schjødt Hansen, Rune Slot Thing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-01-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e088595.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592565029830656
author Karina Dahl Steffensen
Signe Timm
Torben Frøstrup Hansen
Thomas Leth Fink
Charlotte Kristiansen
Torben Schjødt Hansen
Rune Slot Thing
author_facet Karina Dahl Steffensen
Signe Timm
Torben Frøstrup Hansen
Thomas Leth Fink
Charlotte Kristiansen
Torben Schjødt Hansen
Rune Slot Thing
author_sort Karina Dahl Steffensen
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Patient engagement is continuously being promoted by patients as well as politicians and healthcare professionals. One way of increasing patient engagement is by using shared decision-making (SDM), which is a joint effort of clinicians and patients making decisions together.When planning stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for a lung tumour located close to the thoracic wall, there are conflicting interests between (1) delivering the highest possible dose to obtain local tumour control and (2) reducing the dose to the thoracic wall to decrease the risk of chest wall pain and rib fractures following treatment. The radiation oncologist often makes the choice of dose without any engagement of the patient. We believe that the patients should be engaged in such a decision.To explore this matter, we have designed a randomised trial, ‘SDM Lung SBRT’, for which we present our study protocol with a special focus on a patient decision aid (PtDA), which is being tested in this trial.Methods and analysis This study includes patients with a lung tumour located ≤1 cm from the thoracic wall. Patients are randomised to have the primary consultation with or without use of the PtDA. Treatment options are a radiation dose of either 66 Gray (Gy) in three fractions, 45 Gy in three fractions or no treatment. The primary outcome is patient engagement in decision-making measured by the validated observer-rated OPTION-12 score. Secondary outcomes are patient-reported outcomes, quality of life and side effects following treatment.Ethics and dissemination All patients give informed consent to participate. According to Danish legislation, ethical approval is not required for this study as studies using questionnaires, observations or other non-biological studies are not considered interventions according to the Committee Act. Results from this study will be presented at scientific meetings and published in English peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04940936).
format Article
id doaj-art-4febcb2af62540159e2ac9d6e3f3be81
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-4febcb2af62540159e2ac9d6e3f3be812025-01-21T07:05:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-01-0115110.1136/bmjopen-2024-088595Enhancing patient engagement: the influence of an in-consult patient decision aid on shared decision-making for lung tumour radiation – protocol for the randomised trial ‘SDM Lung SBRT’Karina Dahl Steffensen0Signe Timm1Torben Frøstrup Hansen2Thomas Leth Fink3Charlotte Kristiansen4Torben Schjødt Hansen5Rune Slot Thing6Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, DenmarkIntroduction Patient engagement is continuously being promoted by patients as well as politicians and healthcare professionals. One way of increasing patient engagement is by using shared decision-making (SDM), which is a joint effort of clinicians and patients making decisions together.When planning stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for a lung tumour located close to the thoracic wall, there are conflicting interests between (1) delivering the highest possible dose to obtain local tumour control and (2) reducing the dose to the thoracic wall to decrease the risk of chest wall pain and rib fractures following treatment. The radiation oncologist often makes the choice of dose without any engagement of the patient. We believe that the patients should be engaged in such a decision.To explore this matter, we have designed a randomised trial, ‘SDM Lung SBRT’, for which we present our study protocol with a special focus on a patient decision aid (PtDA), which is being tested in this trial.Methods and analysis This study includes patients with a lung tumour located ≤1 cm from the thoracic wall. Patients are randomised to have the primary consultation with or without use of the PtDA. Treatment options are a radiation dose of either 66 Gray (Gy) in three fractions, 45 Gy in three fractions or no treatment. The primary outcome is patient engagement in decision-making measured by the validated observer-rated OPTION-12 score. Secondary outcomes are patient-reported outcomes, quality of life and side effects following treatment.Ethics and dissemination All patients give informed consent to participate. According to Danish legislation, ethical approval is not required for this study as studies using questionnaires, observations or other non-biological studies are not considered interventions according to the Committee Act. Results from this study will be presented at scientific meetings and published in English peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04940936).https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e088595.full
spellingShingle Karina Dahl Steffensen
Signe Timm
Torben Frøstrup Hansen
Thomas Leth Fink
Charlotte Kristiansen
Torben Schjødt Hansen
Rune Slot Thing
Enhancing patient engagement: the influence of an in-consult patient decision aid on shared decision-making for lung tumour radiation – protocol for the randomised trial ‘SDM Lung SBRT’
BMJ Open
title Enhancing patient engagement: the influence of an in-consult patient decision aid on shared decision-making for lung tumour radiation – protocol for the randomised trial ‘SDM Lung SBRT’
title_full Enhancing patient engagement: the influence of an in-consult patient decision aid on shared decision-making for lung tumour radiation – protocol for the randomised trial ‘SDM Lung SBRT’
title_fullStr Enhancing patient engagement: the influence of an in-consult patient decision aid on shared decision-making for lung tumour radiation – protocol for the randomised trial ‘SDM Lung SBRT’
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing patient engagement: the influence of an in-consult patient decision aid on shared decision-making for lung tumour radiation – protocol for the randomised trial ‘SDM Lung SBRT’
title_short Enhancing patient engagement: the influence of an in-consult patient decision aid on shared decision-making for lung tumour radiation – protocol for the randomised trial ‘SDM Lung SBRT’
title_sort enhancing patient engagement the influence of an in consult patient decision aid on shared decision making for lung tumour radiation protocol for the randomised trial sdm lung sbrt
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e088595.full
work_keys_str_mv AT karinadahlsteffensen enhancingpatientengagementtheinfluenceofaninconsultpatientdecisionaidonshareddecisionmakingforlungtumourradiationprotocolfortherandomisedtrialsdmlungsbrt
AT signetimm enhancingpatientengagementtheinfluenceofaninconsultpatientdecisionaidonshareddecisionmakingforlungtumourradiationprotocolfortherandomisedtrialsdmlungsbrt
AT torbenfrøstruphansen enhancingpatientengagementtheinfluenceofaninconsultpatientdecisionaidonshareddecisionmakingforlungtumourradiationprotocolfortherandomisedtrialsdmlungsbrt
AT thomaslethfink enhancingpatientengagementtheinfluenceofaninconsultpatientdecisionaidonshareddecisionmakingforlungtumourradiationprotocolfortherandomisedtrialsdmlungsbrt
AT charlottekristiansen enhancingpatientengagementtheinfluenceofaninconsultpatientdecisionaidonshareddecisionmakingforlungtumourradiationprotocolfortherandomisedtrialsdmlungsbrt
AT torbenschjødthansen enhancingpatientengagementtheinfluenceofaninconsultpatientdecisionaidonshareddecisionmakingforlungtumourradiationprotocolfortherandomisedtrialsdmlungsbrt
AT runeslotthing enhancingpatientengagementtheinfluenceofaninconsultpatientdecisionaidonshareddecisionmakingforlungtumourradiationprotocolfortherandomisedtrialsdmlungsbrt