Two Strategies to Improve the Differential Evolution Algorithm for Optimizing Design of Truss Structures
The performance of differential evolution (DE) mostly depends on mutation operator. Inappropriate configurations of mutation strategies and control parameters can cause stagnation due to over exploration or premature convergence due to over exploitation. Balancing exploration and exploitation is cru...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Ching-Yun Kao, Shih-Lin Hung, Budy Setiawan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Civil Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8741862 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Multiobjective Optimization Design of Truss Antenna
by: Di Wu, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Truss Structure Optimization Based on Improved Chicken Swarm Optimization Algorithm
by: Yancang Li, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
A hybrid differential evolution particle swarm optimization algorithm based on dynamic strategies
by: Huarong Xu, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
A New Genetic Algorithm Methodology for Design Optimization of Truss Structures: Bipopulation-Based Genetic Algorithm with Enhanced Interval Search
by: Tugrul Talaslioglu
Published: (2009-01-01) -
An Improved Differential Evolution Algorithm Based on Adaptive Parameter
by: Zhehuang Huang, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)