Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis

There is some controversy about the value of fetal MRI in prenatal diagnosis, and most of the studies examine its accuracy in central nervous system (CNS) pathology. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of fetal MRI in the prenatal diagnosis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Recio Rodríguez, Cristina Andreu-Vázquez, Israel J. Thuissard-Vasallo, Raquel Cano Alonso, Carmina Bermejo López, Ines Tamarit Degenhardt, Pilar Martínez Ten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Radiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4085349
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551249949491200
author Manuel Recio Rodríguez
Cristina Andreu-Vázquez
Israel J. Thuissard-Vasallo
Raquel Cano Alonso
Carmina Bermejo López
Ines Tamarit Degenhardt
Pilar Martínez Ten
author_facet Manuel Recio Rodríguez
Cristina Andreu-Vázquez
Israel J. Thuissard-Vasallo
Raquel Cano Alonso
Carmina Bermejo López
Ines Tamarit Degenhardt
Pilar Martínez Ten
author_sort Manuel Recio Rodríguez
collection DOAJ
description There is some controversy about the value of fetal MRI in prenatal diagnosis, and most of the studies examine its accuracy in central nervous system (CNS) pathology. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of fetal MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) pathology and non-CNS pathology. Patients referred to the Radiology Department between 2007 and 2018 for a fetal MRI after detection of an anomaly in the fetal ultrasound, a high-risk pregnancy, or an inconclusive fetal ultrasound (n = 623) were included in the study. Postnatal diagnosis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI. Fetal MRI was considered to provide additional information over fetal ultrasound when findings of the fetal MRI were not detected in the fetal ultrasound or when established a pathological condition that was not detected in the fetal ultrasound. Fetal MRI provided useful information for the perinatal management and prognosis over fetal ultrasound when findings of the fetal MRI changed the postnatal prognosis, leaded to the decision to legally terminate the pregnancy, changed prenatal or postnatal follow-up, or helped in the planning of prenatal or postnatal treatment. Fetal MRI offered an accurate diagnosis in 97% of cases (compared to 90.4% of fetal ultrasound; p<0.001). Concordance between fetal ultrasound and fetal MRI was 92.1%. Fetal MRI provided additional information over fetal ultrasound in 23.1% of cases. In 11.6% of cases, the information was useful for the perinatal management and prognosis. In 45 cases (7.2%), fetal MRI was the only accurate diagnosis. In conclusion, fetal MRI has a superior diagnostic accuracy, especially in CNS pathology, and provides additional useful information in CNS, thoracic, and abdominal pathology.
format Article
id doaj-art-4efd6fe59fe647ec8d82f8519873fc69
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1941
2090-195X
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Radiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-4efd6fe59fe647ec8d82f8519873fc692025-02-03T06:04:36ZengWileyRadiology Research and Practice2090-19412090-195X2020-01-01202010.1155/2020/40853494085349Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal DiagnosisManuel Recio Rodríguez0Cristina Andreu-Vázquez1Israel J. Thuissard-Vasallo2Raquel Cano Alonso3Carmina Bermejo López4Ines Tamarit Degenhardt5Pilar Martínez Ten6Departamento de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, SpainDepartamento de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, SpainDepartamento de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, SpainDepartamento de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, SpainDelta Ecografía, Madrid, SpainDepartamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, SpainDelta Ecografía, Madrid, SpainThere is some controversy about the value of fetal MRI in prenatal diagnosis, and most of the studies examine its accuracy in central nervous system (CNS) pathology. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of fetal MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) pathology and non-CNS pathology. Patients referred to the Radiology Department between 2007 and 2018 for a fetal MRI after detection of an anomaly in the fetal ultrasound, a high-risk pregnancy, or an inconclusive fetal ultrasound (n = 623) were included in the study. Postnatal diagnosis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI. Fetal MRI was considered to provide additional information over fetal ultrasound when findings of the fetal MRI were not detected in the fetal ultrasound or when established a pathological condition that was not detected in the fetal ultrasound. Fetal MRI provided useful information for the perinatal management and prognosis over fetal ultrasound when findings of the fetal MRI changed the postnatal prognosis, leaded to the decision to legally terminate the pregnancy, changed prenatal or postnatal follow-up, or helped in the planning of prenatal or postnatal treatment. Fetal MRI offered an accurate diagnosis in 97% of cases (compared to 90.4% of fetal ultrasound; p<0.001). Concordance between fetal ultrasound and fetal MRI was 92.1%. Fetal MRI provided additional information over fetal ultrasound in 23.1% of cases. In 11.6% of cases, the information was useful for the perinatal management and prognosis. In 45 cases (7.2%), fetal MRI was the only accurate diagnosis. In conclusion, fetal MRI has a superior diagnostic accuracy, especially in CNS pathology, and provides additional useful information in CNS, thoracic, and abdominal pathology.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4085349
spellingShingle Manuel Recio Rodríguez
Cristina Andreu-Vázquez
Israel J. Thuissard-Vasallo
Raquel Cano Alonso
Carmina Bermejo López
Ines Tamarit Degenhardt
Pilar Martínez Ten
Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis
Radiology Research and Practice
title Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis
title_full Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis
title_fullStr Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis
title_short Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis
title_sort real life diagnostic accuracy of mri in prenatal diagnosis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4085349
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelreciorodriguez reallifediagnosticaccuracyofmriinprenataldiagnosis
AT cristinaandreuvazquez reallifediagnosticaccuracyofmriinprenataldiagnosis
AT israeljthuissardvasallo reallifediagnosticaccuracyofmriinprenataldiagnosis
AT raquelcanoalonso reallifediagnosticaccuracyofmriinprenataldiagnosis
AT carminabermejolopez reallifediagnosticaccuracyofmriinprenataldiagnosis
AT inestamaritdegenhardt reallifediagnosticaccuracyofmriinprenataldiagnosis
AT pilarmartinezten reallifediagnosticaccuracyofmriinprenataldiagnosis