Measurement of Circulating 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: Comparison of an Automated Method with a Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method

Background. The clinical relevance of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) is probably underappreciated, but variations in the measurement of this difficult analyte between different methods limit comparison of results. Methods. In 129 clinical samples, we compared a new automated assay...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armin Zittermann, Jana B. Ernst, Tobias Becker, Jens Dreier, Cornelius Knabbe, Jan F. Gummert, Joachim Kuhn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8501435
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567094937387008
author Armin Zittermann
Jana B. Ernst
Tobias Becker
Jens Dreier
Cornelius Knabbe
Jan F. Gummert
Joachim Kuhn
author_facet Armin Zittermann
Jana B. Ernst
Tobias Becker
Jens Dreier
Cornelius Knabbe
Jan F. Gummert
Joachim Kuhn
author_sort Armin Zittermann
collection DOAJ
description Background. The clinical relevance of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) is probably underappreciated, but variations in the measurement of this difficult analyte between different methods limit comparison of results. Methods. In 129 clinical samples, we compared a new automated assay with a commercially available liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) kit. Results. Median (interquartile range) 1,25(OH)2D concentrations with the automated assay and the LC-MS/MS method were 26.6 pg/mL (18.5–39.0 pg/mL) and 23.6 pg/mL (16.1–31.3 pg/mL), respectively (P=0.001). Using the method-specific cut-offs for deficient 1,25(OH)2D levels (<20 pg/mL for the automated assay and <17 pg/mL for the LC-MS/MS method), the percentage of patients classified as 1,25(OH)2D deficient was 28.7% and 27.1%, respectively. However, concordance between the two methods for deficient levels was only 62% and the concordance correlation coefficient was poor (0.534). The regression equation resulted in an intercept of −1.99 (95% CI: −7.33–1.31) and a slope of 1.27 (95% CI: 1.04–1.52) for the automated assay. The mean bias with respect to the mean of the two methods was −3.8 (1.96 SD: −28.3–20.8) pg/mL for the LC-MS/MS method minus the automated assay. Conclusions. The two methods show only modest correlation and further standardization is required to improve reliability and comparability of 1,25(OH)2D test procedures.
format Article
id doaj-art-4ed717ff803a4a9e85f5734265d9d143
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8760
1687-8779
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
spelling doaj-art-4ed717ff803a4a9e85f5734265d9d1432025-02-03T01:02:22ZengWileyInternational Journal of Analytical Chemistry1687-87601687-87792016-01-01201610.1155/2016/85014358501435Measurement of Circulating 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: Comparison of an Automated Method with a Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry MethodArmin Zittermann0Jana B. Ernst1Tobias Becker2Jens Dreier3Cornelius Knabbe4Jan F. Gummert5Joachim Kuhn6Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyClinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyClinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyInstitute for Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyInstitute for Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyClinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyInstitute for Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyBackground. The clinical relevance of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) is probably underappreciated, but variations in the measurement of this difficult analyte between different methods limit comparison of results. Methods. In 129 clinical samples, we compared a new automated assay with a commercially available liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) kit. Results. Median (interquartile range) 1,25(OH)2D concentrations with the automated assay and the LC-MS/MS method were 26.6 pg/mL (18.5–39.0 pg/mL) and 23.6 pg/mL (16.1–31.3 pg/mL), respectively (P=0.001). Using the method-specific cut-offs for deficient 1,25(OH)2D levels (<20 pg/mL for the automated assay and <17 pg/mL for the LC-MS/MS method), the percentage of patients classified as 1,25(OH)2D deficient was 28.7% and 27.1%, respectively. However, concordance between the two methods for deficient levels was only 62% and the concordance correlation coefficient was poor (0.534). The regression equation resulted in an intercept of −1.99 (95% CI: −7.33–1.31) and a slope of 1.27 (95% CI: 1.04–1.52) for the automated assay. The mean bias with respect to the mean of the two methods was −3.8 (1.96 SD: −28.3–20.8) pg/mL for the LC-MS/MS method minus the automated assay. Conclusions. The two methods show only modest correlation and further standardization is required to improve reliability and comparability of 1,25(OH)2D test procedures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8501435
spellingShingle Armin Zittermann
Jana B. Ernst
Tobias Becker
Jens Dreier
Cornelius Knabbe
Jan F. Gummert
Joachim Kuhn
Measurement of Circulating 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: Comparison of an Automated Method with a Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
title Measurement of Circulating 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: Comparison of an Automated Method with a Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method
title_full Measurement of Circulating 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: Comparison of an Automated Method with a Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method
title_fullStr Measurement of Circulating 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: Comparison of an Automated Method with a Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of Circulating 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: Comparison of an Automated Method with a Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method
title_short Measurement of Circulating 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: Comparison of an Automated Method with a Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method
title_sort measurement of circulating 1 25 dihydroxyvitamin d comparison of an automated method with a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8501435
work_keys_str_mv AT arminzittermann measurementofcirculating125dihydroxyvitamindcomparisonofanautomatedmethodwithaliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometrymethod
AT janabernst measurementofcirculating125dihydroxyvitamindcomparisonofanautomatedmethodwithaliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometrymethod
AT tobiasbecker measurementofcirculating125dihydroxyvitamindcomparisonofanautomatedmethodwithaliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometrymethod
AT jensdreier measurementofcirculating125dihydroxyvitamindcomparisonofanautomatedmethodwithaliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometrymethod
AT corneliusknabbe measurementofcirculating125dihydroxyvitamindcomparisonofanautomatedmethodwithaliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometrymethod
AT janfgummert measurementofcirculating125dihydroxyvitamindcomparisonofanautomatedmethodwithaliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometrymethod
AT joachimkuhn measurementofcirculating125dihydroxyvitamindcomparisonofanautomatedmethodwithaliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometrymethod