Ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards: a review
This review described the state of the science concerning the generation, measurement, and mitigation of ammonia (NH3) emissions from beef cattle feedyards. NH3 emissions primarily come from urinary urea in cattle manure. In the past, constant emission factors were used to inventory NH3 emissions. C...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Animal Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2025.1608387/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849710277128355840 |
|---|---|
| author | Myeongseong Lee Myeongseong Lee Brent W. Auvermann Brent W. Auvermann Luis O. Tedeschi Jacek A. Koziel Carolina B. Brandani Carolina B. Brandani Vinícius N. Gouvêa Vinícius N. Gouvêa Jason K. Smith Jason K. Smith Kenneth D. Casey Kenneth D. Casey |
| author_facet | Myeongseong Lee Myeongseong Lee Brent W. Auvermann Brent W. Auvermann Luis O. Tedeschi Jacek A. Koziel Carolina B. Brandani Carolina B. Brandani Vinícius N. Gouvêa Vinícius N. Gouvêa Jason K. Smith Jason K. Smith Kenneth D. Casey Kenneth D. Casey |
| author_sort | Myeongseong Lee |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This review described the state of the science concerning the generation, measurement, and mitigation of ammonia (NH3) emissions from beef cattle feedyards. NH3 emissions primarily come from urinary urea in cattle manure. In the past, constant emission factors were used to inventory NH3 emissions. Currently, NH3 emission factors estimated by process-based mechanistic models reflecting various factors affecting NH3 emissions in the feedyard environment are available. This review of current literature indicated the average NH3 emissions from a beef cattle feedyard was approximately 119 g/head/day (range 24 to 318 g/head/day), and the average NH3 flux was approximately 58 µg/m2/s (range 2 to 185 µg/m2/s). Although more realistic estimates of NH3 emission flux from open-lot livestock facilities were being obtained using process-based models, there was still significant variation depending on the diet composition, manure management practices, and the feedyard environment, including both seasonal weather patterns and synoptic weather events. We note the need to improve inventories of NH3 emissions into categories of crude protein percentage, manure management implemented, and feedyard environment. Some mitigation strategies can be effective, such as diet manipulation, growth-promoting technologies, and manure or pen-surface amendments. Of those, precision diet feeding to meet but not exceed protein requirements appeared to be the most practical way to reduce ammonia emissions over the animals’ feeding period; laboratory studies suggested that shorter-term reductions in emission flux may be possible with the other approaches, but they were far more speculative at this point as to both their efficacy and their cost of implementation. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4eaa3e2b8aed445997d000bd1b322023 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2673-6225 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Animal Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-4eaa3e2b8aed445997d000bd1b3220232025-08-20T03:14:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Animal Science2673-62252025-07-01610.3389/fanim.2025.16083871608387Ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards: a reviewMyeongseong Lee0Myeongseong Lee1Brent W. Auvermann2Brent W. Auvermann3Luis O. Tedeschi4Jacek A. Koziel5Carolina B. Brandani6Carolina B. Brandani7Vinícius N. Gouvêa8Vinícius N. Gouvêa9Jason K. Smith10Jason K. Smith11Kenneth D. Casey12Kenneth D. Casey13Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Amarillo, TX, United StatesDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College, Station, TX, United StatesTexas A&M AgriLife Research, Amarillo, TX, United StatesDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College, Station, TX, United StatesDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College, Station, TX, United StatesLivestock Nutrient Management Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX, United StatesTexas A&M AgriLife Research, Amarillo, TX, United StatesDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College, Station, TX, United StatesTexas A&M AgriLife Research, Amarillo, TX, United StatesDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College, Station, TX, United StatesDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College, Station, TX, United StatesTexas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Amarillo, TX, United StatesTexas A&M AgriLife Research, Amarillo, TX, United StatesDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College, Station, TX, United StatesThis review described the state of the science concerning the generation, measurement, and mitigation of ammonia (NH3) emissions from beef cattle feedyards. NH3 emissions primarily come from urinary urea in cattle manure. In the past, constant emission factors were used to inventory NH3 emissions. Currently, NH3 emission factors estimated by process-based mechanistic models reflecting various factors affecting NH3 emissions in the feedyard environment are available. This review of current literature indicated the average NH3 emissions from a beef cattle feedyard was approximately 119 g/head/day (range 24 to 318 g/head/day), and the average NH3 flux was approximately 58 µg/m2/s (range 2 to 185 µg/m2/s). Although more realistic estimates of NH3 emission flux from open-lot livestock facilities were being obtained using process-based models, there was still significant variation depending on the diet composition, manure management practices, and the feedyard environment, including both seasonal weather patterns and synoptic weather events. We note the need to improve inventories of NH3 emissions into categories of crude protein percentage, manure management implemented, and feedyard environment. Some mitigation strategies can be effective, such as diet manipulation, growth-promoting technologies, and manure or pen-surface amendments. Of those, precision diet feeding to meet but not exceed protein requirements appeared to be the most practical way to reduce ammonia emissions over the animals’ feeding period; laboratory studies suggested that shorter-term reductions in emission flux may be possible with the other approaches, but they were far more speculative at this point as to both their efficacy and their cost of implementation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2025.1608387/fullgas quantificationemission factorsemission mitigationfeedyard management practicesair qualitysustainable agriculture |
| spellingShingle | Myeongseong Lee Myeongseong Lee Brent W. Auvermann Brent W. Auvermann Luis O. Tedeschi Jacek A. Koziel Carolina B. Brandani Carolina B. Brandani Vinícius N. Gouvêa Vinícius N. Gouvêa Jason K. Smith Jason K. Smith Kenneth D. Casey Kenneth D. Casey Ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards: a review Frontiers in Animal Science gas quantification emission factors emission mitigation feedyard management practices air quality sustainable agriculture |
| title | Ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards: a review |
| title_full | Ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards: a review |
| title_fullStr | Ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards: a review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards: a review |
| title_short | Ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards: a review |
| title_sort | ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards a review |
| topic | gas quantification emission factors emission mitigation feedyard management practices air quality sustainable agriculture |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2025.1608387/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT myeongseonglee ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT myeongseonglee ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT brentwauvermann ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT brentwauvermann ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT luisotedeschi ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT jacekakoziel ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT carolinabbrandani ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT carolinabbrandani ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT viniciusngouvea ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT viniciusngouvea ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT jasonksmith ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT jasonksmith ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT kennethdcasey ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview AT kennethdcasey ammoniaemissionsfrombeefcattlefeedyardsareview |