An Evaluation of Ad Hoc Presence-Only Data in Explaining Patterns of Distribution: Cetacean Sightings from Whale-Watching Vessels

The analysis of presence-only data is a problem in determining species distributions and accurately determining population sizes. The collection of such data is common from unequal or nonrandomised effort surveys, such as those surveys conducted by citizen scientists. However, causative regression-b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louisa K. Higby, Richard Stafford, Chiara G. Bertulli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Zoology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/428752
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558928658956288
author Louisa K. Higby
Richard Stafford
Chiara G. Bertulli
author_facet Louisa K. Higby
Richard Stafford
Chiara G. Bertulli
author_sort Louisa K. Higby
collection DOAJ
description The analysis of presence-only data is a problem in determining species distributions and accurately determining population sizes. The collection of such data is common from unequal or nonrandomised effort surveys, such as those surveys conducted by citizen scientists. However, causative regression-based methods have been less well examined using presence-only data. In this study, we examine a range of predictive factors which might influence Cetacean sightings (specifically minke whale sightings) from whale-watching vessels in Faxaflói Bay in Iceland. In this case, environmental variables were collected regularly regardless of whether sightings were recorded. Including absences as well as presence in the analysis resulted in a multiple-generalised linear regression model with significantly more explanatory power than when data were presence only. However, by including extra information on the sightings of the whales, in this case, their observed behaviour when the sighting occurred resulted in a significantly improved model over the presence-only data model. While there are limitations of conducting nonrandomised surveys for the use of predictive models such as regression, presence-only data should not be considered as worthless, and the scope of collection of these data by citizen scientists using modern technology should not be underestimated.
format Article
id doaj-art-4e83f658aa314ee3bdc1e0e1eb01594f
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8477
1687-8485
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Zoology
spelling doaj-art-4e83f658aa314ee3bdc1e0e1eb01594f2025-02-03T01:31:12ZengWileyInternational Journal of Zoology1687-84771687-84852012-01-01201210.1155/2012/428752428752An Evaluation of Ad Hoc Presence-Only Data in Explaining Patterns of Distribution: Cetacean Sightings from Whale-Watching VesselsLouisa K. Higby0Richard Stafford1Chiara G. Bertulli2School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UKDivision of Science, Institute of Biomedical and Environmental Science and Technology, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JU, UKSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Life and Enviromental Sciences, Elding Whale-Watching, Ægisgata 7, 101 Reykjavik, IcelandThe analysis of presence-only data is a problem in determining species distributions and accurately determining population sizes. The collection of such data is common from unequal or nonrandomised effort surveys, such as those surveys conducted by citizen scientists. However, causative regression-based methods have been less well examined using presence-only data. In this study, we examine a range of predictive factors which might influence Cetacean sightings (specifically minke whale sightings) from whale-watching vessels in Faxaflói Bay in Iceland. In this case, environmental variables were collected regularly regardless of whether sightings were recorded. Including absences as well as presence in the analysis resulted in a multiple-generalised linear regression model with significantly more explanatory power than when data were presence only. However, by including extra information on the sightings of the whales, in this case, their observed behaviour when the sighting occurred resulted in a significantly improved model over the presence-only data model. While there are limitations of conducting nonrandomised surveys for the use of predictive models such as regression, presence-only data should not be considered as worthless, and the scope of collection of these data by citizen scientists using modern technology should not be underestimated.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/428752
spellingShingle Louisa K. Higby
Richard Stafford
Chiara G. Bertulli
An Evaluation of Ad Hoc Presence-Only Data in Explaining Patterns of Distribution: Cetacean Sightings from Whale-Watching Vessels
International Journal of Zoology
title An Evaluation of Ad Hoc Presence-Only Data in Explaining Patterns of Distribution: Cetacean Sightings from Whale-Watching Vessels
title_full An Evaluation of Ad Hoc Presence-Only Data in Explaining Patterns of Distribution: Cetacean Sightings from Whale-Watching Vessels
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Ad Hoc Presence-Only Data in Explaining Patterns of Distribution: Cetacean Sightings from Whale-Watching Vessels
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Ad Hoc Presence-Only Data in Explaining Patterns of Distribution: Cetacean Sightings from Whale-Watching Vessels
title_short An Evaluation of Ad Hoc Presence-Only Data in Explaining Patterns of Distribution: Cetacean Sightings from Whale-Watching Vessels
title_sort evaluation of ad hoc presence only data in explaining patterns of distribution cetacean sightings from whale watching vessels
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/428752
work_keys_str_mv AT louisakhigby anevaluationofadhocpresenceonlydatainexplainingpatternsofdistributioncetaceansightingsfromwhalewatchingvessels
AT richardstafford anevaluationofadhocpresenceonlydatainexplainingpatternsofdistributioncetaceansightingsfromwhalewatchingvessels
AT chiaragbertulli anevaluationofadhocpresenceonlydatainexplainingpatternsofdistributioncetaceansightingsfromwhalewatchingvessels
AT louisakhigby evaluationofadhocpresenceonlydatainexplainingpatternsofdistributioncetaceansightingsfromwhalewatchingvessels
AT richardstafford evaluationofadhocpresenceonlydatainexplainingpatternsofdistributioncetaceansightingsfromwhalewatchingvessels
AT chiaragbertulli evaluationofadhocpresenceonlydatainexplainingpatternsofdistributioncetaceansightingsfromwhalewatchingvessels