Comparative analysis of some search engines
We compared the information retrieval performances of some popular search engines (namely, Google, Yahoo, AlltheWeb, Gigablast, Zworks and AltaVista and Bing/MSN) in response to a list of ten queries, varying in complexity. These queries were run on each search engine and the precision and respons...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Academy of Science of South Africa
2010-09-01
|
| Series: | South African Journal of Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://sajs.co.za/article/view/10101 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850152386183561216 |
|---|---|
| author | Joseph Edosomwan Taiwo Edosomwan |
| author_facet | Joseph Edosomwan Taiwo Edosomwan |
| author_sort | Joseph Edosomwan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We compared the information retrieval performances of some popular search engines (namely, Google, Yahoo, AlltheWeb, Gigablast, Zworks and AltaVista and Bing/MSN) in response to a list of ten queries, varying in complexity. These queries were run on each search engine and the precision and response time of the retrieved results were recorded. The first ten documents on each retrieval output were evaluated as being 'relevant' or 'non-relevant' for evaluation of the search engine's precision. To evaluate response time, normalised recall ratios were calculated at various cut-off points for each query and search engine. This study shows that Google appears to be the best search engine in terms of both average precision (70%) and average response time (2 s). Gigablast and AlltheWeb performed the worst overall in this study. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4e09ba90b70c4a09a0e1bf5d4b5e40a5 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1996-7489 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2010-09-01 |
| publisher | Academy of Science of South Africa |
| record_format | Article |
| series | South African Journal of Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-4e09ba90b70c4a09a0e1bf5d4b5e40a52025-08-20T02:25:59ZengAcademy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science1996-74892010-09-0110611/124 pages4 pages8303Comparative analysis of some search enginesJoseph Edosomwan0Taiwo Edosomwan1College of Education, Ekiadolor-BeninCollege of Education, Ekiadolor-BeninWe compared the information retrieval performances of some popular search engines (namely, Google, Yahoo, AlltheWeb, Gigablast, Zworks and AltaVista and Bing/MSN) in response to a list of ten queries, varying in complexity. These queries were run on each search engine and the precision and response time of the retrieved results were recorded. The first ten documents on each retrieval output were evaluated as being 'relevant' or 'non-relevant' for evaluation of the search engine's precision. To evaluate response time, normalised recall ratios were calculated at various cut-off points for each query and search engine. This study shows that Google appears to be the best search engine in terms of both average precision (70%) and average response time (2 s). Gigablast and AlltheWeb performed the worst overall in this study.https://sajs.co.za/article/view/10101cataloguecrawlerindexprecisionresponse timesearch enginespider |
| spellingShingle | Joseph Edosomwan Taiwo Edosomwan Comparative analysis of some search engines South African Journal of Science catalogue crawler index precision response time search engine spider |
| title | Comparative analysis of some search engines |
| title_full | Comparative analysis of some search engines |
| title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of some search engines |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of some search engines |
| title_short | Comparative analysis of some search engines |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of some search engines |
| topic | catalogue crawler index precision response time search engine spider |
| url | https://sajs.co.za/article/view/10101 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT josephedosomwan comparativeanalysisofsomesearchengines AT taiwoedosomwan comparativeanalysisofsomesearchengines |