Regional Anaesthesia Is Associated with Shorter Postanaesthetic Care and Less Pain Than General Anaesthesia after Upper Extremity Surgery

Introduction. For surgery on the upper extremity, the anaesthetist often has a choice between regional anaesthesia (RA) and general anaesthesia (GA). We sought to investigate the possible differences between RA and GA after upper extremity surgery with regard to postoperative patient comfort. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sven Grauman, Jakob Boethius, Joakim Johansson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6308371
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566202139934720
author Sven Grauman
Jakob Boethius
Joakim Johansson
author_facet Sven Grauman
Jakob Boethius
Joakim Johansson
author_sort Sven Grauman
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. For surgery on the upper extremity, the anaesthetist often has a choice between regional anaesthesia (RA) and general anaesthesia (GA). We sought to investigate the possible differences between RA and GA after upper extremity surgery with regard to postoperative patient comfort. Methods. This is a retrospective observational study that was performed at an acute care secondary referral centre. One hundred and eighty-seven procedures involving orthopaedic surgery on the upper extremity were included. The different groups (RA and GA) were compared regarding the primary outcome variable, length of stay in Postanaesthesia Unit, and secondary outcome variables, opioid consumption and nausea treatment. Results. RA was associated with significantly shorter median length of stay (99 versus 171 minutes). In the GA group, 32% of the patients received opioid analgesics and 21% received antiemetics. In the RA group, none received opioid analgesics and 3% received antiemetics. Conclusion. In this observational study, RA was superior to GA for surgery of the upper extremity regarding Postanaesthesia Care Unit length of stay, number of doses of analgesic, and number of doses of antiemetic administered.
format Article
id doaj-art-4de4cc8298ad4b8dbe3b2c8f52a83c92
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-4de4cc8298ad4b8dbe3b2c8f52a83c922025-02-03T01:04:50ZengWileyAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702016-01-01201610.1155/2016/63083716308371Regional Anaesthesia Is Associated with Shorter Postanaesthetic Care and Less Pain Than General Anaesthesia after Upper Extremity SurgerySven Grauman0Jakob Boethius1Joakim Johansson2Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, SwedenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, SwedenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, SwedenIntroduction. For surgery on the upper extremity, the anaesthetist often has a choice between regional anaesthesia (RA) and general anaesthesia (GA). We sought to investigate the possible differences between RA and GA after upper extremity surgery with regard to postoperative patient comfort. Methods. This is a retrospective observational study that was performed at an acute care secondary referral centre. One hundred and eighty-seven procedures involving orthopaedic surgery on the upper extremity were included. The different groups (RA and GA) were compared regarding the primary outcome variable, length of stay in Postanaesthesia Unit, and secondary outcome variables, opioid consumption and nausea treatment. Results. RA was associated with significantly shorter median length of stay (99 versus 171 minutes). In the GA group, 32% of the patients received opioid analgesics and 21% received antiemetics. In the RA group, none received opioid analgesics and 3% received antiemetics. Conclusion. In this observational study, RA was superior to GA for surgery of the upper extremity regarding Postanaesthesia Care Unit length of stay, number of doses of analgesic, and number of doses of antiemetic administered.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6308371
spellingShingle Sven Grauman
Jakob Boethius
Joakim Johansson
Regional Anaesthesia Is Associated with Shorter Postanaesthetic Care and Less Pain Than General Anaesthesia after Upper Extremity Surgery
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
title Regional Anaesthesia Is Associated with Shorter Postanaesthetic Care and Less Pain Than General Anaesthesia after Upper Extremity Surgery
title_full Regional Anaesthesia Is Associated with Shorter Postanaesthetic Care and Less Pain Than General Anaesthesia after Upper Extremity Surgery
title_fullStr Regional Anaesthesia Is Associated with Shorter Postanaesthetic Care and Less Pain Than General Anaesthesia after Upper Extremity Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Regional Anaesthesia Is Associated with Shorter Postanaesthetic Care and Less Pain Than General Anaesthesia after Upper Extremity Surgery
title_short Regional Anaesthesia Is Associated with Shorter Postanaesthetic Care and Less Pain Than General Anaesthesia after Upper Extremity Surgery
title_sort regional anaesthesia is associated with shorter postanaesthetic care and less pain than general anaesthesia after upper extremity surgery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6308371
work_keys_str_mv AT svengrauman regionalanaesthesiaisassociatedwithshorterpostanaestheticcareandlesspainthangeneralanaesthesiaafterupperextremitysurgery
AT jakobboethius regionalanaesthesiaisassociatedwithshorterpostanaestheticcareandlesspainthangeneralanaesthesiaafterupperextremitysurgery
AT joakimjohansson regionalanaesthesiaisassociatedwithshorterpostanaestheticcareandlesspainthangeneralanaesthesiaafterupperextremitysurgery