Comparison of ZETA Fast (PTS) (Optopol Technology) and Humphrey SITA Fast (SFA) (Carl Zeiss Meditec) Perimetric Strategies
Purpose. To compare two threshold strategies for visual field assessment, ZETA Fast (Optopol Technology) and Humphrey SITA Fast (Carl Zeiss Meditec), in controls and subjects with glaucoma. Patients and Methods. A prospective case-control study was carried out in which the clinical practice study in...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Basil Mathews, Jeff Laux, Cassandra Barnhart, David Fleischman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5675793 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparison of Advanced Threshold and SITA Fast Perimetric Strategies
by: Bartosz L. Sikorski, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Un nouveau périmètre pour les sciences de l’éducation
by: Bernard Fraysse
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Container Ports: SFA or DEA?
by: İsmail Yenilmez
Published: (2025-02-01) -
FastEEC: Fast evaluation of N-point energy correlators
by: Ankita Budhraja, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
EFMDR-Fast: An Application of Empirical Fuzzy Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction for Fast Execution
by: Sangseob Leem, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)