Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids: Clinical Outcomes

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a preferred home dialysis modality and has a number of added advantages including improved initial patient survival and cost effectiveness over haemodialysis. Despite these benefits, uptake of PD remains relatively low, especially in developed countries. Wider implementat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yeoungjee Cho, Sunil V. Badve, Carmel M. Hawley, Kathryn Wiggins, David W. Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Nephrology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/812609
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832557093862768640
author Yeoungjee Cho
Sunil V. Badve
Carmel M. Hawley
Kathryn Wiggins
David W. Johnson
author_facet Yeoungjee Cho
Sunil V. Badve
Carmel M. Hawley
Kathryn Wiggins
David W. Johnson
author_sort Yeoungjee Cho
collection DOAJ
description Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a preferred home dialysis modality and has a number of added advantages including improved initial patient survival and cost effectiveness over haemodialysis. Despite these benefits, uptake of PD remains relatively low, especially in developed countries. Wider implementation of PD is compromised by higher technique failure from infections (e.g., PD peritonitis) and ultrafiltration failure. These are inevitable consequences of peritoneal injury, which is thought to result primarily from continuous exposure to PD fluids that are characterised by their “unphysiologic” composition. In order to overcome these barriers, a number of more biocompatible PD fluids, with neutral pH, low glucose degradation product content, and bicarbonate buffer have been manufactured over the past two decades. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated their benefit in terms of improvement in host cell defence, peritoneal membrane integrity, and cytokine profile. This paper aims to review randomised controlled trials assessing the use of biocompatible PD fluids and their effect on clinical outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-4cdf5b05d31c40e889e429992a9a404f
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-214X
2090-2158
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Nephrology
spelling doaj-art-4cdf5b05d31c40e889e429992a9a404f2025-02-03T05:43:37ZengWileyInternational Journal of Nephrology2090-214X2090-21582012-01-01201210.1155/2012/812609812609Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids: Clinical OutcomesYeoungjee Cho0Sunil V. Badve1Carmel M. Hawley2Kathryn Wiggins3David W. Johnson4Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Level 2, ARTS Building, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane QLD 4102, AustraliaDepartment of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Level 2, ARTS Building, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane QLD 4102, AustraliaDepartment of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Level 2, ARTS Building, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane QLD 4102, AustraliaDepartment of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, AustraliaDepartment of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Level 2, ARTS Building, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane QLD 4102, AustraliaPeritoneal dialysis (PD) is a preferred home dialysis modality and has a number of added advantages including improved initial patient survival and cost effectiveness over haemodialysis. Despite these benefits, uptake of PD remains relatively low, especially in developed countries. Wider implementation of PD is compromised by higher technique failure from infections (e.g., PD peritonitis) and ultrafiltration failure. These are inevitable consequences of peritoneal injury, which is thought to result primarily from continuous exposure to PD fluids that are characterised by their “unphysiologic” composition. In order to overcome these barriers, a number of more biocompatible PD fluids, with neutral pH, low glucose degradation product content, and bicarbonate buffer have been manufactured over the past two decades. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated their benefit in terms of improvement in host cell defence, peritoneal membrane integrity, and cytokine profile. This paper aims to review randomised controlled trials assessing the use of biocompatible PD fluids and their effect on clinical outcomes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/812609
spellingShingle Yeoungjee Cho
Sunil V. Badve
Carmel M. Hawley
Kathryn Wiggins
David W. Johnson
Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids: Clinical Outcomes
International Journal of Nephrology
title Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids: Clinical Outcomes
title_full Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids: Clinical Outcomes
title_fullStr Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids: Clinical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids: Clinical Outcomes
title_short Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids: Clinical Outcomes
title_sort biocompatible peritoneal dialysis fluids clinical outcomes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/812609
work_keys_str_mv AT yeoungjeecho biocompatibleperitonealdialysisfluidsclinicaloutcomes
AT sunilvbadve biocompatibleperitonealdialysisfluidsclinicaloutcomes
AT carmelmhawley biocompatibleperitonealdialysisfluidsclinicaloutcomes
AT kathrynwiggins biocompatibleperitonealdialysisfluidsclinicaloutcomes
AT davidwjohnson biocompatibleperitonealdialysisfluidsclinicaloutcomes