Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy
On the question whether the controversy in the field of philosophy in our time, the author responds negatively, for the following reasons: in the early ages of the real clash of interests could not be, because all the philosophers were inside understanding integrity of the world and their teaching i...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MGIMO University Press
2012-12-01
|
| Series: | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1646 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832579624434925568 |
|---|---|
| author | Milan Uzelaz |
| author_facet | Milan Uzelaz |
| author_sort | Milan Uzelaz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | On the question whether the controversy in the field of philosophy in our time, the author responds negatively, for the following reasons: in the early ages of the real clash of interests could not be, because all the philosophers were inside understanding integrity of the world and their teaching is not consistent; today's thinkers have no more idea of the world that they could unify and give them a uniform basis for the formation of speculative concepts. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4c2afe00a3784d67b364625a9eda732a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2071-8160 2541-9099 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2012-12-01 |
| publisher | MGIMO University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| spelling | doaj-art-4c2afe00a3784d67b364625a9eda732a2025-01-30T12:16:04ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992012-12-0106(27)21321510.24833/2071-8160-2012-6-27-213-2151301Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary PhilosophyMilan Uzelaz0Высшая педагогическая школа Вршац (Сербия)On the question whether the controversy in the field of philosophy in our time, the author responds negatively, for the following reasons: in the early ages of the real clash of interests could not be, because all the philosophers were inside understanding integrity of the world and their teaching is not consistent; today's thinkers have no more idea of the world that they could unify and give them a uniform basis for the formation of speculative concepts.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1646dialoguepluralismrelativitypostgegelevsky periodthe phenomenology of husserlantagonism of modern science and philosophy |
| spellingShingle | Milan Uzelaz Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta dialogue pluralism relativity postgegelevsky period the phenomenology of husserl antagonism of modern science and philosophy |
| title | Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy |
| title_full | Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy |
| title_fullStr | Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy |
| title_short | Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy |
| title_sort | polemical reflections about the possibility of controversy in contemporary philosophy |
| topic | dialogue pluralism relativity postgegelevsky period the phenomenology of husserl antagonism of modern science and philosophy |
| url | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1646 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT milanuzelaz polemicalreflectionsaboutthepossibilityofcontroversyincontemporaryphilosophy |