Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach
Improved prostate biopsy procedures have been developed to overcome traditional limitations, aiming to enhance cancer diagnosis accuracy. To assess the existing knowledge of the effectiveness and risks linked to transperineal (TP) vs. transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy. Approaches: a comprehensive sea...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
AVES
2024-07-01
|
| Series: | Urology Research and Practice |
| Online Access: | https://urologyresearchandpractice.org/en/meta-analysis-of-efficacy-and-safety-of-prostate-biopsy-a-comparison-between-transperineal-and-transrectal-approach-133958 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832576043693637632 |
|---|---|
| author | Syah Mirsya Warli Stivano Rizky Valentino Torry Dhirajaya Dharma Kadar Ginanda Putra Siregar Fauriski Febrian Prapiska |
| author_facet | Syah Mirsya Warli Stivano Rizky Valentino Torry Dhirajaya Dharma Kadar Ginanda Putra Siregar Fauriski Febrian Prapiska |
| author_sort | Syah Mirsya Warli |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Improved prostate biopsy procedures have been developed to overcome traditional limitations, aiming to enhance cancer diagnosis accuracy. To assess the existing knowledge of the effectiveness and risks linked to transperineal (TP) vs. transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy. Approaches: a comprehensive search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to locate all pertinent papers published till June 8, 2023. Data on cancer detection rate and complications after prostate biopsy were gathered and analyzed via Review Manager software. A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of the study type. A total of 19 publications, involving 80133 patients with suspicion of prostate cancer who underwent prostate biopsy, were enrolled in the analysis. The pooled estimate demonstrated no significant differences in the cancer detection rate between TR and TP (risk difference (RD)=0.03; 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.08; P = .12). In terms of complications, the TP approach significantly decreased the risk of rectal bleeding (odds ratio (OR)=0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.51; P < .001), fever and urinary tract infection (OR=0.28; 95% CI: 0.15-0.52; P < .001), and sepsis (OR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.28-0.90; P=.02) compared to the TR approach. In conclusion, there was no significant disparity in the cancer detection rate between TP and TR approaches. However, the TP strategy exhibited an advantage over TR due to a reduced risk of infection and rectal bleeding. Further research is needed to validate these results and develop a more efficient diagnostic approach for prostate cancer. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4bd075d69bc049049556370d563cc1e6 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2980-1478 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-07-01 |
| publisher | AVES |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Urology Research and Practice |
| spelling | doaj-art-4bd075d69bc049049556370d563cc1e62025-01-31T12:30:19ZengAVESUrology Research and Practice2980-14782024-07-0150420821810.5152/tud.2025.24094Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal ApproachSyah Mirsya Warli0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8339-1072Stivano Rizky Valentino Torry1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0437-0159Dhirajaya Dharma Kadar2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3173-0316Ginanda Putra Siregar3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8991-9707Fauriski Febrian Prapiska4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4165-3078Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara – Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, IndonesiaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia – Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, IndonesiaDepartment of Urology, Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital – Universitas Sumatera Utara, IndonesiaDepartment of Urology, Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital – Universitas Sumatera Utara, IndonesiaDepartment of Urology, Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital – Universitas Sumatera Utara, IndonesiaImproved prostate biopsy procedures have been developed to overcome traditional limitations, aiming to enhance cancer diagnosis accuracy. To assess the existing knowledge of the effectiveness and risks linked to transperineal (TP) vs. transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy. Approaches: a comprehensive search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to locate all pertinent papers published till June 8, 2023. Data on cancer detection rate and complications after prostate biopsy were gathered and analyzed via Review Manager software. A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of the study type. A total of 19 publications, involving 80133 patients with suspicion of prostate cancer who underwent prostate biopsy, were enrolled in the analysis. The pooled estimate demonstrated no significant differences in the cancer detection rate between TR and TP (risk difference (RD)=0.03; 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.08; P = .12). In terms of complications, the TP approach significantly decreased the risk of rectal bleeding (odds ratio (OR)=0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.51; P < .001), fever and urinary tract infection (OR=0.28; 95% CI: 0.15-0.52; P < .001), and sepsis (OR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.28-0.90; P=.02) compared to the TR approach. In conclusion, there was no significant disparity in the cancer detection rate between TP and TR approaches. However, the TP strategy exhibited an advantage over TR due to a reduced risk of infection and rectal bleeding. Further research is needed to validate these results and develop a more efficient diagnostic approach for prostate cancer.https://urologyresearchandpractice.org/en/meta-analysis-of-efficacy-and-safety-of-prostate-biopsy-a-comparison-between-transperineal-and-transrectal-approach-133958 |
| spellingShingle | Syah Mirsya Warli Stivano Rizky Valentino Torry Dhirajaya Dharma Kadar Ginanda Putra Siregar Fauriski Febrian Prapiska Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach Urology Research and Practice |
| title | Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach |
| title_full | Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach |
| title_fullStr | Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach |
| title_full_unstemmed | Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach |
| title_short | Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach |
| title_sort | meta analysis of efficacy and safety of prostate biopsy a comparison between transperineal and transrectal approach |
| url | https://urologyresearchandpractice.org/en/meta-analysis-of-efficacy-and-safety-of-prostate-biopsy-a-comparison-between-transperineal-and-transrectal-approach-133958 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT syahmirsyawarli metaanalysisofefficacyandsafetyofprostatebiopsyacomparisonbetweentransperinealandtransrectalapproach AT stivanorizkyvalentinotorry metaanalysisofefficacyandsafetyofprostatebiopsyacomparisonbetweentransperinealandtransrectalapproach AT dhirajayadharmakadar metaanalysisofefficacyandsafetyofprostatebiopsyacomparisonbetweentransperinealandtransrectalapproach AT ginandaputrasiregar metaanalysisofefficacyandsafetyofprostatebiopsyacomparisonbetweentransperinealandtransrectalapproach AT fauriskifebrianprapiska metaanalysisofefficacyandsafetyofprostatebiopsyacomparisonbetweentransperinealandtransrectalapproach |