Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri‐environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes
Abstract Nature recovery requires the provisioning of resources in the right place and in sufficient quantities to support wildlife populations and improve ecological processes. Agri‐environment schemes (AES) have been a major mechanism for delivering environmental management across EU‐farmed landsc...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | People and Nature |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10785 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832087346849251328 |
|---|---|
| author | D. J. Baker C. Nye R. Wheeler C. Masquelier A. Binner K. J. Gaston M. S. Heard M. Lobley D. Smith I. M. D. Maclean |
| author_facet | D. J. Baker C. Nye R. Wheeler C. Masquelier A. Binner K. J. Gaston M. S. Heard M. Lobley D. Smith I. M. D. Maclean |
| author_sort | D. J. Baker |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Nature recovery requires the provisioning of resources in the right place and in sufficient quantities to support wildlife populations and improve ecological processes. Agri‐environment schemes (AES) have been a major mechanism for delivering environmental management across EU‐farmed landscapes, but measured benefits to nature are often negligible in large part due to a lack of strategic spatial targeting of management actions. As an example, AES in England are often delivered using a participatory strategy, typically at individual farm scale, with types of management agreements and uptake reflecting the business model and interests of each farm. However, this implementation model can result in poorly distributed conservation resources and, consequently, a failure to recover nature across larger scales, even if individual agreements are delivered well. Achieving effective, large‐scale nature recovery through AES requires aligning its implementation with spatially targeted approaches that prioritise specific conservation goals. We discuss the rationale for, and major barriers to, aligning AES design and implementation to these approaches. We then highlight how, through the framework of systematic conservation planning, both the strategic and participatory components of AES could be aligned better to enhance nature recovery outcomes. To ensure AES help achieve nature recovery goals, clear and measurable targets must be set with the type and spatial configuration of actions designed to enable meeting targets. Strategic spatial targeting must also be carried out with the implementation phase in mind, accounting for socio‐economic opportunities and barriers to engagement and acknowledging that uncertainties around farm‐scale implementation mean plans must be adaptable. Participatory approaches for AES design and implementation that support the delivery of spatially targeted management actions are required, most notably by facilitating collaboration or cooperation across farm holdings. For AES to contribute effectively to nature recovery goals, aligning strategic and participatory approaches in its design and implementation is crucial. This requires uniting knowledge across disciplines and cultures and ensuring that information is shared to support progressive refinement of scheme design and guidance towards achieving overall nature recovery goals. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4b12c1b8878049f99ec47cd83672bc68 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2575-8314 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | People and Nature |
| spelling | doaj-art-4b12c1b8878049f99ec47cd83672bc682025-02-06T05:27:38ZengWileyPeople and Nature2575-83142025-02-017232934510.1002/pan3.10785Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri‐environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomesD. J. Baker0C. Nye1R. Wheeler2C. Masquelier3A. Binner4K. J. Gaston5M. S. Heard6M. Lobley7D. Smith8I. M. D. Maclean9Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter Penryn Cornwall UKCentre for Rural Policy Research University of Exeter Exeter Devon UKCentre for Rural Policy Research University of Exeter Exeter Devon UKDepartment of Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy and Anthropology University of Exeter Exeter Devon UKLand, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute University of Exeter Exeter Devon UKEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter Penryn Cornwall UKNational Trust Swindon UKCentre for Rural Policy Research University of Exeter Exeter Devon UKEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter Penryn Cornwall UKEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter Penryn Cornwall UKAbstract Nature recovery requires the provisioning of resources in the right place and in sufficient quantities to support wildlife populations and improve ecological processes. Agri‐environment schemes (AES) have been a major mechanism for delivering environmental management across EU‐farmed landscapes, but measured benefits to nature are often negligible in large part due to a lack of strategic spatial targeting of management actions. As an example, AES in England are often delivered using a participatory strategy, typically at individual farm scale, with types of management agreements and uptake reflecting the business model and interests of each farm. However, this implementation model can result in poorly distributed conservation resources and, consequently, a failure to recover nature across larger scales, even if individual agreements are delivered well. Achieving effective, large‐scale nature recovery through AES requires aligning its implementation with spatially targeted approaches that prioritise specific conservation goals. We discuss the rationale for, and major barriers to, aligning AES design and implementation to these approaches. We then highlight how, through the framework of systematic conservation planning, both the strategic and participatory components of AES could be aligned better to enhance nature recovery outcomes. To ensure AES help achieve nature recovery goals, clear and measurable targets must be set with the type and spatial configuration of actions designed to enable meeting targets. Strategic spatial targeting must also be carried out with the implementation phase in mind, accounting for socio‐economic opportunities and barriers to engagement and acknowledging that uncertainties around farm‐scale implementation mean plans must be adaptable. Participatory approaches for AES design and implementation that support the delivery of spatially targeted management actions are required, most notably by facilitating collaboration or cooperation across farm holdings. For AES to contribute effectively to nature recovery goals, aligning strategic and participatory approaches in its design and implementation is crucial. This requires uniting knowledge across disciplines and cultures and ensuring that information is shared to support progressive refinement of scheme design and guidance towards achieving overall nature recovery goals. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10785agri‐environment schemecollaborative AESnature recoveryparticipatory strategyspatial prioritisationsystematic conservation planning |
| spellingShingle | D. J. Baker C. Nye R. Wheeler C. Masquelier A. Binner K. J. Gaston M. S. Heard M. Lobley D. Smith I. M. D. Maclean Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri‐environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes People and Nature agri‐environment scheme collaborative AES nature recovery participatory strategy spatial prioritisation systematic conservation planning |
| title | Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri‐environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes |
| title_full | Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri‐environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes |
| title_fullStr | Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri‐environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri‐environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes |
| title_short | Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri‐environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes |
| title_sort | aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes |
| topic | agri‐environment scheme collaborative AES nature recovery participatory strategy spatial prioritisation systematic conservation planning |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10785 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT djbaker aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes AT cnye aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes AT rwheeler aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes AT cmasquelier aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes AT abinner aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes AT kjgaston aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes AT msheard aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes AT mlobley aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes AT dsmith aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes AT imdmaclean aligningstrategicandparticipatoryapproachestoagrienvironmentschemedesignandimplementationtoenhancenaturerecoveryoutcomes |