Updated Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of PD−1 versus PD−L1 inhibitors in first−line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive−stage small-cell lung cancer

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-1 + Chemo) and programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 + Chemo) for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ke Wang, Chuangjie Zheng, Xinrong Chen, Penghui Lin, Mengge Lin, Cuizhen Chen, Linzhu Zhai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1455306/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583775362482176
author Ke Wang
Ke Wang
Chuangjie Zheng
Chuangjie Zheng
Xinrong Chen
Xinrong Chen
Penghui Lin
Mengge Lin
Cuizhen Chen
Linzhu Zhai
author_facet Ke Wang
Ke Wang
Chuangjie Zheng
Chuangjie Zheng
Xinrong Chen
Xinrong Chen
Penghui Lin
Mengge Lin
Cuizhen Chen
Linzhu Zhai
author_sort Ke Wang
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-1 + Chemo) and programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 + Chemo) for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis of relevant data using R software, considering overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAES).ResultsPD-1 + Chemo (OS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; PFS: HR 0.59) and PD-L1 + Chemo (OS: HR 0.72; PFS: HR 0.73) significantly prolonged survival and did not increase the incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs compared with chemotherapy. Indirect comparisons showed no significant difference in clinical efficacy (OS: HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.86–1.1; PFS: HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.61–1.0) or safety (HR 1.0, 95% CI: 0.93–1.1) between PD-1 + Chemo and PD-L1 + Chemo. Non-cumulative probability ranking plot ranking results showed that PD-1 + Chemo ranked first in OS and PFS. Patients with PD-L1 expression levels < 1%, PD-1 + Chemo showed a trend of disadvantage (OS: HR 1.3; PFS: HR 1.2), whereas for patients with PD-L1 expression levels ≥ 1%, PD-1 + Chemo showed a trend of advantage (OS: HR 0.85; PFS: HR 0.85).ConclusionsPD-1 + Chemo and PD-L1 + Chemo significantly prolonged OS and PFS in patients with ES-SCLC and did not significantly increase the incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAES. The efficacy and safety profiles of PD-1 + Chemo and PD-L1 + Chemo appear to be similar.
format Article
id doaj-art-4a968a01f31349c39e3c90698afe188e
institution Kabale University
issn 2234-943X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj-art-4a968a01f31349c39e3c90698afe188e2025-01-28T05:10:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2025-01-011410.3389/fonc.2024.14553061455306Updated Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of PD−1 versus PD−L1 inhibitors in first−line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive−stage small-cell lung cancerKe Wang0Ke Wang1Chuangjie Zheng2Chuangjie Zheng3Xinrong Chen4Xinrong Chen5Penghui Lin6Mengge Lin7Cuizhen Chen8Linzhu Zhai9Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaLingnan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaLingnan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaLingnan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaCancer Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaCancer Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaCancer Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaCancer Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, ChinaObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-1 + Chemo) and programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 + Chemo) for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis of relevant data using R software, considering overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAES).ResultsPD-1 + Chemo (OS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; PFS: HR 0.59) and PD-L1 + Chemo (OS: HR 0.72; PFS: HR 0.73) significantly prolonged survival and did not increase the incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs compared with chemotherapy. Indirect comparisons showed no significant difference in clinical efficacy (OS: HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.86–1.1; PFS: HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.61–1.0) or safety (HR 1.0, 95% CI: 0.93–1.1) between PD-1 + Chemo and PD-L1 + Chemo. Non-cumulative probability ranking plot ranking results showed that PD-1 + Chemo ranked first in OS and PFS. Patients with PD-L1 expression levels < 1%, PD-1 + Chemo showed a trend of disadvantage (OS: HR 1.3; PFS: HR 1.2), whereas for patients with PD-L1 expression levels ≥ 1%, PD-1 + Chemo showed a trend of advantage (OS: HR 0.85; PFS: HR 0.85).ConclusionsPD-1 + Chemo and PD-L1 + Chemo significantly prolonged OS and PFS in patients with ES-SCLC and did not significantly increase the incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAES. The efficacy and safety profiles of PD-1 + Chemo and PD-L1 + Chemo appear to be similar.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1455306/fullextensive-stage small-cell lung cancerefficacy and safetyPD-1 inhibitorsPD-L1 inhibitorsnetwork meta-analysis
spellingShingle Ke Wang
Ke Wang
Chuangjie Zheng
Chuangjie Zheng
Xinrong Chen
Xinrong Chen
Penghui Lin
Mengge Lin
Cuizhen Chen
Linzhu Zhai
Updated Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of PD−1 versus PD−L1 inhibitors in first−line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive−stage small-cell lung cancer
Frontiers in Oncology
extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer
efficacy and safety
PD-1 inhibitors
PD-L1 inhibitors
network meta-analysis
title Updated Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of PD−1 versus PD−L1 inhibitors in first−line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive−stage small-cell lung cancer
title_full Updated Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of PD−1 versus PD−L1 inhibitors in first−line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive−stage small-cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Updated Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of PD−1 versus PD−L1 inhibitors in first−line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive−stage small-cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Updated Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of PD−1 versus PD−L1 inhibitors in first−line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive−stage small-cell lung cancer
title_short Updated Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of PD−1 versus PD−L1 inhibitors in first−line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive−stage small-cell lung cancer
title_sort updated bayesian network meta analysis on the efficacy and safety of pd 1 versus pd l1 inhibitors in first line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer
topic extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer
efficacy and safety
PD-1 inhibitors
PD-L1 inhibitors
network meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1455306/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kewang updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT kewang updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT chuangjiezheng updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT chuangjiezheng updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT xinrongchen updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT xinrongchen updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT penghuilin updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT menggelin updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT cuizhenchen updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT linzhuzhai updatedbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofpd1versuspdl1inhibitorsinfirstlinetreatmentwithchemotherapyforextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer