Comparative Abilities of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Abdominal Volume Index, Body Adiposity Index, and Conicity Index as Predictive Screening Tools for Metabolic Syndrome among Apparently Healthy Ghanaian Adults

The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) continues to increase. There is therefore the need for early detection to avert possible adverse outcomes. Several anthropometric methods have been suggested to predict MetS, but no consensus has been reached on which is best. The aim of the study was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lawrence Quaye, William Kwame Boakye Ansah Owiredu, Nafiu Amidu, Peter Paul Mwinsanga Dapare, Yussif Adams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Obesity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8143179
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549994038558720
author Lawrence Quaye
William Kwame Boakye Ansah Owiredu
Nafiu Amidu
Peter Paul Mwinsanga Dapare
Yussif Adams
author_facet Lawrence Quaye
William Kwame Boakye Ansah Owiredu
Nafiu Amidu
Peter Paul Mwinsanga Dapare
Yussif Adams
author_sort Lawrence Quaye
collection DOAJ
description The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) continues to increase. There is therefore the need for early detection to avert possible adverse outcomes. Several anthropometric methods have been suggested to predict MetS, but no consensus has been reached on which is best. The aim of the study was to explore the comparative abilities of conicity index, body adiposity index, abdominal volume index, body mass index, and waist circumference in predicting cardiometabolic risk among apparently healthy adults in the Tamale metropolis. This study was a cross sectional study conducted from September 2017 to January 2018, among one hundred sixty (160) apparently healthy normoglycemic normotensive adults. A self-designed questionnaire was administered to gather sociodemographic data. Anthropometric and haemodynamic measurements were also taken. Blood samples were collected for fasting blood glucose (FBG) and lipid profile. MetS was classified using the harmonised criteria as indicated by the joint interim statement (JIS). Of 160 participants, 42.5% were male and 57.5% were female. Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) associated better with MetS and other cardiovascular risk factors. Generally, BMI and WC showed largest area under curves (AUCs) than abdominal volume index (AVI), body adiposity index (BAI), and conicity index (CI) in predicting MetS and its components. Upon gender stratification, AVI and CI had the larger AUCs in females whiles BMI remained the superior index in males. Whiles BMI and WC remained useful parameters, they were not useful in predicting MetS and its components in the female population in this study.
format Article
id doaj-art-4a89f36378b048a58f13e1b901d6cc28
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Obesity
spelling doaj-art-4a89f36378b048a58f13e1b901d6cc282025-02-03T06:07:57ZengWileyJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162019-01-01201910.1155/2019/81431798143179Comparative Abilities of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Abdominal Volume Index, Body Adiposity Index, and Conicity Index as Predictive Screening Tools for Metabolic Syndrome among Apparently Healthy Ghanaian AdultsLawrence Quaye0William Kwame Boakye Ansah Owiredu1Nafiu Amidu2Peter Paul Mwinsanga Dapare3Yussif Adams4Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, University for Development Studies, Tamale, GhanaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, GhanaDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, University for Development Studies, Tamale, GhanaDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, University for Development Studies, Tamale, GhanaDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, University for Development Studies, Tamale, GhanaThe prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) continues to increase. There is therefore the need for early detection to avert possible adverse outcomes. Several anthropometric methods have been suggested to predict MetS, but no consensus has been reached on which is best. The aim of the study was to explore the comparative abilities of conicity index, body adiposity index, abdominal volume index, body mass index, and waist circumference in predicting cardiometabolic risk among apparently healthy adults in the Tamale metropolis. This study was a cross sectional study conducted from September 2017 to January 2018, among one hundred sixty (160) apparently healthy normoglycemic normotensive adults. A self-designed questionnaire was administered to gather sociodemographic data. Anthropometric and haemodynamic measurements were also taken. Blood samples were collected for fasting blood glucose (FBG) and lipid profile. MetS was classified using the harmonised criteria as indicated by the joint interim statement (JIS). Of 160 participants, 42.5% were male and 57.5% were female. Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) associated better with MetS and other cardiovascular risk factors. Generally, BMI and WC showed largest area under curves (AUCs) than abdominal volume index (AVI), body adiposity index (BAI), and conicity index (CI) in predicting MetS and its components. Upon gender stratification, AVI and CI had the larger AUCs in females whiles BMI remained the superior index in males. Whiles BMI and WC remained useful parameters, they were not useful in predicting MetS and its components in the female population in this study.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8143179
spellingShingle Lawrence Quaye
William Kwame Boakye Ansah Owiredu
Nafiu Amidu
Peter Paul Mwinsanga Dapare
Yussif Adams
Comparative Abilities of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Abdominal Volume Index, Body Adiposity Index, and Conicity Index as Predictive Screening Tools for Metabolic Syndrome among Apparently Healthy Ghanaian Adults
Journal of Obesity
title Comparative Abilities of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Abdominal Volume Index, Body Adiposity Index, and Conicity Index as Predictive Screening Tools for Metabolic Syndrome among Apparently Healthy Ghanaian Adults
title_full Comparative Abilities of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Abdominal Volume Index, Body Adiposity Index, and Conicity Index as Predictive Screening Tools for Metabolic Syndrome among Apparently Healthy Ghanaian Adults
title_fullStr Comparative Abilities of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Abdominal Volume Index, Body Adiposity Index, and Conicity Index as Predictive Screening Tools for Metabolic Syndrome among Apparently Healthy Ghanaian Adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Abilities of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Abdominal Volume Index, Body Adiposity Index, and Conicity Index as Predictive Screening Tools for Metabolic Syndrome among Apparently Healthy Ghanaian Adults
title_short Comparative Abilities of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Abdominal Volume Index, Body Adiposity Index, and Conicity Index as Predictive Screening Tools for Metabolic Syndrome among Apparently Healthy Ghanaian Adults
title_sort comparative abilities of body mass index waist circumference abdominal volume index body adiposity index and conicity index as predictive screening tools for metabolic syndrome among apparently healthy ghanaian adults
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8143179
work_keys_str_mv AT lawrencequaye comparativeabilitiesofbodymassindexwaistcircumferenceabdominalvolumeindexbodyadiposityindexandconicityindexaspredictivescreeningtoolsformetabolicsyndromeamongapparentlyhealthyghanaianadults
AT williamkwameboakyeansahowiredu comparativeabilitiesofbodymassindexwaistcircumferenceabdominalvolumeindexbodyadiposityindexandconicityindexaspredictivescreeningtoolsformetabolicsyndromeamongapparentlyhealthyghanaianadults
AT nafiuamidu comparativeabilitiesofbodymassindexwaistcircumferenceabdominalvolumeindexbodyadiposityindexandconicityindexaspredictivescreeningtoolsformetabolicsyndromeamongapparentlyhealthyghanaianadults
AT peterpaulmwinsangadapare comparativeabilitiesofbodymassindexwaistcircumferenceabdominalvolumeindexbodyadiposityindexandconicityindexaspredictivescreeningtoolsformetabolicsyndromeamongapparentlyhealthyghanaianadults
AT yussifadams comparativeabilitiesofbodymassindexwaistcircumferenceabdominalvolumeindexbodyadiposityindexandconicityindexaspredictivescreeningtoolsformetabolicsyndromeamongapparentlyhealthyghanaianadults