Performance Indicators Analysis of Universities Participating in the Priority 2030 Program Research Track
The article presents the results of performance indicators analysis of groups of universities participating in “Leadership in Research” track (hereinafter referred to as the research track) of the strategic academic leadership program Priority 2030. To solve this problem, the displaced ideal method...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Moscow Polytechnic University
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Высшее образование в России |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4873 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832574366138761216 |
|---|---|
| author | A. I. Guseva V. M. Kalashnik V. I. Kaminsky S. V. Kireev |
| author_facet | A. I. Guseva V. M. Kalashnik V. I. Kaminsky S. V. Kireev |
| author_sort | A. I. Guseva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article presents the results of performance indicators analysis of groups of universities participating in “Leadership in Research” track (hereinafter referred to as the research track) of the strategic academic leadership program Priority 2030. To solve this problem, the displaced ideal method was used, which allows to compare the aggregated performance indicators of three groups of universities. The comparative analysis of the special part performance indicators was carried out and also included aggregated indicators of basic and special parts in 2022. To assess the dynamics of universities’ activities in 2020–2022, aggregated indicators of the special part were analyzed. The research showed that special part performance indicators achieved by universities participating in the Program correspond quite well with the results of the general assessment, accepted by the Council at the end of 2023. It was found that the achievement of performance indicators for universities in implementing their development programs had a significant impact on the positions of participants in the research track and enabled the rotation mechanism to be launched in full power for the first time since the beginning of the Program. As a result, 30% of universities in the research track changed their groups |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-498364e6e96d49afa4a3f52b1dcdc204 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0869-3617 2072-0459 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Moscow Polytechnic University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Высшее образование в России |
| spelling | doaj-art-498364e6e96d49afa4a3f52b1dcdc2042025-02-01T13:14:32ZengMoscow Polytechnic UniversityВысшее образование в России0869-36172072-04592024-04-01333496310.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-3-49-632456Performance Indicators Analysis of Universities Participating in the Priority 2030 Program Research TrackA. I. Guseva0V. M. Kalashnik1V. I. Kaminsky2S. V. Kireev3National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)The article presents the results of performance indicators analysis of groups of universities participating in “Leadership in Research” track (hereinafter referred to as the research track) of the strategic academic leadership program Priority 2030. To solve this problem, the displaced ideal method was used, which allows to compare the aggregated performance indicators of three groups of universities. The comparative analysis of the special part performance indicators was carried out and also included aggregated indicators of basic and special parts in 2022. To assess the dynamics of universities’ activities in 2020–2022, aggregated indicators of the special part were analyzed. The research showed that special part performance indicators achieved by universities participating in the Program correspond quite well with the results of the general assessment, accepted by the Council at the end of 2023. It was found that the achievement of performance indicators for universities in implementing their development programs had a significant impact on the positions of participants in the research track and enabled the rotation mechanism to be launched in full power for the first time since the beginning of the Program. As a result, 30% of universities in the research track changed their groupshttps://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4873priority 2030 programleadership in researchdisplaced ideal methoduniversity performance indicators |
| spellingShingle | A. I. Guseva V. M. Kalashnik V. I. Kaminsky S. V. Kireev Performance Indicators Analysis of Universities Participating in the Priority 2030 Program Research Track Высшее образование в России priority 2030 program leadership in research displaced ideal method university performance indicators |
| title | Performance Indicators Analysis of Universities Participating in the Priority 2030 Program Research Track |
| title_full | Performance Indicators Analysis of Universities Participating in the Priority 2030 Program Research Track |
| title_fullStr | Performance Indicators Analysis of Universities Participating in the Priority 2030 Program Research Track |
| title_full_unstemmed | Performance Indicators Analysis of Universities Participating in the Priority 2030 Program Research Track |
| title_short | Performance Indicators Analysis of Universities Participating in the Priority 2030 Program Research Track |
| title_sort | performance indicators analysis of universities participating in the priority 2030 program research track |
| topic | priority 2030 program leadership in research displaced ideal method university performance indicators |
| url | https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4873 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aiguseva performanceindicatorsanalysisofuniversitiesparticipatinginthepriority2030programresearchtrack AT vmkalashnik performanceindicatorsanalysisofuniversitiesparticipatinginthepriority2030programresearchtrack AT vikaminsky performanceindicatorsanalysisofuniversitiesparticipatinginthepriority2030programresearchtrack AT svkireev performanceindicatorsanalysisofuniversitiesparticipatinginthepriority2030programresearchtrack |