Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm
Abstract The remarkable regenerative abilities of flatworms are closely linked to neoblasts – adult pluripotent stem cells that are the only division-competent cell type outside of the reproductive system. Although the presence of neoblast-like cells and whole-body regeneration in other animals has...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54716-x |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832571508725121024 |
---|---|
author | Ludwik Gąsiorowski Chew Chai Andrei Rozanski Gargi Purandare Fruzsina Ficze Athanasia Mizi Bo Wang Jochen C. Rink |
author_facet | Ludwik Gąsiorowski Chew Chai Andrei Rozanski Gargi Purandare Fruzsina Ficze Athanasia Mizi Bo Wang Jochen C. Rink |
author_sort | Ludwik Gąsiorowski |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract The remarkable regenerative abilities of flatworms are closely linked to neoblasts – adult pluripotent stem cells that are the only division-competent cell type outside of the reproductive system. Although the presence of neoblast-like cells and whole-body regeneration in other animals has led to the idea that these features may represent the ancestral metazoan state, the evolutionary origin of both remains unclear. Here we show that the catenulid Stenostomum brevipharyngium, a member of the earliest-branching flatworm lineage, lacks conventional neoblasts despite being capable of whole-body regeneration and asexual reproduction. Using a combination of single-nuclei transcriptomics, in situ gene expression analysis, and functional experiments, we find that cell divisions are not restricted to a single cell type and are associated with multiple fully differentiated somatic tissues. Furthermore, the cohort of germline multipotency genes, which are considered canonical neoblast markers, are not expressed in dividing cells, but in the germline instead, and we experimentally show that they are neither necessary for proliferation nor regeneration. Overall, our results challenge the notion that canonical neoblasts are necessary for flatworm regeneration and open up the possibility that neoblast-like cells may have evolved convergently in different animals, independent of their regenerative capacity. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-49381b90ca17473b92ceca210e5c5af0 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2041-1723 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Nature Communications |
spelling | doaj-art-49381b90ca17473b92ceca210e5c5af02025-02-02T12:32:01ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232025-01-0116111410.1038/s41467-024-54716-xRegeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatwormLudwik Gąsiorowski0Chew Chai1Andrei Rozanski2Gargi Purandare3Fruzsina Ficze4Athanasia Mizi5Bo Wang6Jochen C. Rink7Department of Tissue Dynamics and Regeneration, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary SciencesDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford UniversityDepartment of Tissue Dynamics and Regeneration, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary SciencesDepartment of Tissue Dynamics and Regeneration, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary SciencesDepartment of Tissue Dynamics and Regeneration, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary SciencesInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre GöttingenDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford UniversityDepartment of Tissue Dynamics and Regeneration, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary SciencesAbstract The remarkable regenerative abilities of flatworms are closely linked to neoblasts – adult pluripotent stem cells that are the only division-competent cell type outside of the reproductive system. Although the presence of neoblast-like cells and whole-body regeneration in other animals has led to the idea that these features may represent the ancestral metazoan state, the evolutionary origin of both remains unclear. Here we show that the catenulid Stenostomum brevipharyngium, a member of the earliest-branching flatworm lineage, lacks conventional neoblasts despite being capable of whole-body regeneration and asexual reproduction. Using a combination of single-nuclei transcriptomics, in situ gene expression analysis, and functional experiments, we find that cell divisions are not restricted to a single cell type and are associated with multiple fully differentiated somatic tissues. Furthermore, the cohort of germline multipotency genes, which are considered canonical neoblast markers, are not expressed in dividing cells, but in the germline instead, and we experimentally show that they are neither necessary for proliferation nor regeneration. Overall, our results challenge the notion that canonical neoblasts are necessary for flatworm regeneration and open up the possibility that neoblast-like cells may have evolved convergently in different animals, independent of their regenerative capacity.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54716-x |
spellingShingle | Ludwik Gąsiorowski Chew Chai Andrei Rozanski Gargi Purandare Fruzsina Ficze Athanasia Mizi Bo Wang Jochen C. Rink Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm Nature Communications |
title | Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm |
title_full | Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm |
title_fullStr | Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm |
title_full_unstemmed | Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm |
title_short | Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm |
title_sort | regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54716-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ludwikgasiorowski regenerationintheabsenceofcanonicalneoblastsinanearlybranchingflatworm AT chewchai regenerationintheabsenceofcanonicalneoblastsinanearlybranchingflatworm AT andreirozanski regenerationintheabsenceofcanonicalneoblastsinanearlybranchingflatworm AT gargipurandare regenerationintheabsenceofcanonicalneoblastsinanearlybranchingflatworm AT fruzsinaficze regenerationintheabsenceofcanonicalneoblastsinanearlybranchingflatworm AT athanasiamizi regenerationintheabsenceofcanonicalneoblastsinanearlybranchingflatworm AT bowang regenerationintheabsenceofcanonicalneoblastsinanearlybranchingflatworm AT jochencrink regenerationintheabsenceofcanonicalneoblastsinanearlybranchingflatworm |