On the Religious Perception of a Thunderstorm and the Attitude to a Lightning Rod in Russia in the Second Half of the 18th Century

One document of 1799, related to the construction activity of the Russian Imperial Court, contains the refusal of Emperor Paul I to make a lightning rod on the spire of the church of St. Michael’s Castle, which was then under construction at St. Petersburg. That decision was rather strange as far as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nikolai I. Petrov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Orthodox Church. Ekaterinburg Theological Seminary of the Ekaterinburg Eparchy 2024-12-01
Series:Вестник Екатеринбургской духовной семинарии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epds.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/6_N48-2024_Petrov.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850242877124247552
author Nikolai I. Petrov
author_facet Nikolai I. Petrov
author_sort Nikolai I. Petrov
collection DOAJ
description One document of 1799, related to the construction activity of the Russian Imperial Court, contains the refusal of Emperor Paul I to make a lightning rod on the spire of the church of St. Michael’s Castle, which was then under construction at St. Petersburg. That decision was rather strange as far as during the late 18th century the installation of lightning rods on the buildings became widespread. This article is an attempt to clarify the context, which determined such a decision of Paul I. Invention of the lightning rod was connected with Benjamin Franklin’s researches which were, in the second half of the 18th century, directly associated with his republican ideas. It was reflected in the famous epigram addressed to Franklin: “He snatched lightning from the sky and the scepter from tyrants”. One can assume that by the time of his accession Paul had a stable association of the lightning rod invention with the revolutionary ideas, which had been already realized in France at that time. This association could be nourished by the negative responses of some clergymen on the Franklin’s invention: in the discussions about the lightning rod the religious counterarguments were used and they came back to understanding of a lightning as an instrument of God’s providence. These ideas were also widespread at St. Petersburg in the second half of the 18th century: one description of the Russian capital provides a similar explanation of the fires in some churches, which were caused by lightning. The understanding of a lightning as God’s favor should have been much closer to Paul I than Franklin’s rationalism of the republican. In the European medieval narrations a lightning was associated with the Archangel Michael’s image. And its significance for St. Michael’s Castle is well known: the decision of Paul I to build it was preceded by a formed legend about the Archangel Michael’s apparition at that place. Another tale about the apparitions of Archangel Michael on the mount Gargano could have been considered as the evidence of construction and consecration of St. Michael’s church by the Archangel himself, through the use of thunder and lightning. In the context of this tale, a resistance to the lightning with the help of a lightning rod, apparently, should have been perceived by Paul I as fighting against Archangel Michael.
format Article
id doaj-art-48f1835d32034b288ea9d8045e4b279d
institution OA Journals
issn 2224-5391
2782-7496
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Russian Orthodox Church. Ekaterinburg Theological Seminary of the Ekaterinburg Eparchy
record_format Article
series Вестник Екатеринбургской духовной семинарии
spelling doaj-art-48f1835d32034b288ea9d8045e4b279d2025-08-20T02:00:09ZengRussian Orthodox Church. Ekaterinburg Theological Seminary of the Ekaterinburg EparchyВестник Екатеринбургской духовной семинарии2224-53912782-74962024-12-014816118610.24412/2224-5391-2024-48-161-186On the Religious Perception of a Thunderstorm and the Attitude to a Lightning Rod in Russia in the Second Half of the 18th CenturyNikolai I. Petrov0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8523-572XSt. Petersburg Theological AcademyOne document of 1799, related to the construction activity of the Russian Imperial Court, contains the refusal of Emperor Paul I to make a lightning rod on the spire of the church of St. Michael’s Castle, which was then under construction at St. Petersburg. That decision was rather strange as far as during the late 18th century the installation of lightning rods on the buildings became widespread. This article is an attempt to clarify the context, which determined such a decision of Paul I. Invention of the lightning rod was connected with Benjamin Franklin’s researches which were, in the second half of the 18th century, directly associated with his republican ideas. It was reflected in the famous epigram addressed to Franklin: “He snatched lightning from the sky and the scepter from tyrants”. One can assume that by the time of his accession Paul had a stable association of the lightning rod invention with the revolutionary ideas, which had been already realized in France at that time. This association could be nourished by the negative responses of some clergymen on the Franklin’s invention: in the discussions about the lightning rod the religious counterarguments were used and they came back to understanding of a lightning as an instrument of God’s providence. These ideas were also widespread at St. Petersburg in the second half of the 18th century: one description of the Russian capital provides a similar explanation of the fires in some churches, which were caused by lightning. The understanding of a lightning as God’s favor should have been much closer to Paul I than Franklin’s rationalism of the republican. In the European medieval narrations a lightning was associated with the Archangel Michael’s image. And its significance for St. Michael’s Castle is well known: the decision of Paul I to build it was preceded by a formed legend about the Archangel Michael’s apparition at that place. Another tale about the apparitions of Archangel Michael on the mount Gargano could have been considered as the evidence of construction and consecration of St. Michael’s church by the Archangel himself, through the use of thunder and lightning. In the context of this tale, a resistance to the lightning with the help of a lightning rod, apparently, should have been perceived by Paul I as fighting against Archangel Michael.https://epds.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/6_N48-2024_Petrov.pdfrussian emperor paul ist. petersburgst. michael’s castlelightning rodbenjamin franklinarchangel michaellightning as an attribute
spellingShingle Nikolai I. Petrov
On the Religious Perception of a Thunderstorm and the Attitude to a Lightning Rod in Russia in the Second Half of the 18th Century
Вестник Екатеринбургской духовной семинарии
russian emperor paul i
st. petersburg
st. michael’s castle
lightning rod
benjamin franklin
archangel michael
lightning as an attribute
title On the Religious Perception of a Thunderstorm and the Attitude to a Lightning Rod in Russia in the Second Half of the 18th Century
title_full On the Religious Perception of a Thunderstorm and the Attitude to a Lightning Rod in Russia in the Second Half of the 18th Century
title_fullStr On the Religious Perception of a Thunderstorm and the Attitude to a Lightning Rod in Russia in the Second Half of the 18th Century
title_full_unstemmed On the Religious Perception of a Thunderstorm and the Attitude to a Lightning Rod in Russia in the Second Half of the 18th Century
title_short On the Religious Perception of a Thunderstorm and the Attitude to a Lightning Rod in Russia in the Second Half of the 18th Century
title_sort on the religious perception of a thunderstorm and the attitude to a lightning rod in russia in the second half of the 18th century
topic russian emperor paul i
st. petersburg
st. michael’s castle
lightning rod
benjamin franklin
archangel michael
lightning as an attribute
url https://epds.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/6_N48-2024_Petrov.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolaiipetrov onthereligiousperceptionofathunderstormandtheattitudetoalightningrodinrussiainthesecondhalfofthe18thcentury