Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Experience at a Tertiary Center in a Developing Country

Background. Aortic valve stenosis accounts for 3–6% of congenital heart disease. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is the preferred therapeutic intervention in many centers. However, most of the reported data are from developed countries. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective single-c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatme A. Charafeddine, Haytham Bou Houssein, Nadine B. Kibbi, Issam M. El-Rassi, Anas M. Tabbakh, Mohammad S. Abutaqa, Ziad F. Bulbul, Nour K. Younis, Mariam T. Arabi, Fadi F. Bitar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6681693
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568563637944320
author Fatme A. Charafeddine
Haytham Bou Houssein
Nadine B. Kibbi
Issam M. El-Rassi
Anas M. Tabbakh
Mohammad S. Abutaqa
Ziad F. Bulbul
Nour K. Younis
Mariam T. Arabi
Fadi F. Bitar
author_facet Fatme A. Charafeddine
Haytham Bou Houssein
Nadine B. Kibbi
Issam M. El-Rassi
Anas M. Tabbakh
Mohammad S. Abutaqa
Ziad F. Bulbul
Nour K. Younis
Mariam T. Arabi
Fadi F. Bitar
author_sort Fatme A. Charafeddine
collection DOAJ
description Background. Aortic valve stenosis accounts for 3–6% of congenital heart disease. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is the preferred therapeutic intervention in many centers. However, most of the reported data are from developed countries. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective single-center study involving consecutive eligible neonates and infants with congenital aortic stenosis admitted for percutaneous BAV between January 2005 and January 2016 to our tertiary center. We evaluated the short- and mid-term outcomes associated with the use of BAV as a treatment for congenital aortic stenosis (CAS) at a tertiary center in a developing country. Similarly, we compared these outcomes to those reported in developed countries. Results. During the study period, a total of thirty patients, newborns (n = 15) and infants/children (n = 15), underwent BAV. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction was present in 56% of the patients. Isolated AS was present in 19 patients (63%). Associated anomalies were present in 11 patients (37%): seven (21%) had coarctation of the aorta, two (6%) had restrictive ventricular septal defects, one had mild Ebstein anomaly, one had Shone’s syndrome, and one had cleft mitral valve. BAV was not associated with perioperative or immediate postoperative mortality. Immediately following the valvuloplasty, a more than mild aortic regurgitation was noted only in two patients (7%). A none-to-mild aortic regurgitation was noted in the remaining 93%. One patient died three months after the procedure. At a mean follow-up of 7 years, twenty patients (69%) had more than mild aortic regurgitation, and four patients (13%) required surgical intervention. Kaplan–Meier freedom from aortic valve reintervention was 97% at 1 year and 87% at 10 years of follow-up. Conclusion. Based on outcomes encountered at a tertiary center in a developing country, BAV is an effective and safe modality associated with low complication rates comparable to those reported in developed countries.
format Article
id doaj-art-48b5b2e821e84676af04d203de7426b1
institution Kabale University
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-48b5b2e821e84676af04d203de7426b12025-02-03T00:58:47ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832021-01-01202110.1155/2021/66816936681693Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Experience at a Tertiary Center in a Developing CountryFatme A. Charafeddine0Haytham Bou Houssein1Nadine B. Kibbi2Issam M. El-Rassi3Anas M. Tabbakh4Mohammad S. Abutaqa5Ziad F. Bulbul6Nour K. Younis7Mariam T. Arabi8Fadi F. Bitar9Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, LebanonFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, LebanonBackground. Aortic valve stenosis accounts for 3–6% of congenital heart disease. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is the preferred therapeutic intervention in many centers. However, most of the reported data are from developed countries. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective single-center study involving consecutive eligible neonates and infants with congenital aortic stenosis admitted for percutaneous BAV between January 2005 and January 2016 to our tertiary center. We evaluated the short- and mid-term outcomes associated with the use of BAV as a treatment for congenital aortic stenosis (CAS) at a tertiary center in a developing country. Similarly, we compared these outcomes to those reported in developed countries. Results. During the study period, a total of thirty patients, newborns (n = 15) and infants/children (n = 15), underwent BAV. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction was present in 56% of the patients. Isolated AS was present in 19 patients (63%). Associated anomalies were present in 11 patients (37%): seven (21%) had coarctation of the aorta, two (6%) had restrictive ventricular septal defects, one had mild Ebstein anomaly, one had Shone’s syndrome, and one had cleft mitral valve. BAV was not associated with perioperative or immediate postoperative mortality. Immediately following the valvuloplasty, a more than mild aortic regurgitation was noted only in two patients (7%). A none-to-mild aortic regurgitation was noted in the remaining 93%. One patient died three months after the procedure. At a mean follow-up of 7 years, twenty patients (69%) had more than mild aortic regurgitation, and four patients (13%) required surgical intervention. Kaplan–Meier freedom from aortic valve reintervention was 97% at 1 year and 87% at 10 years of follow-up. Conclusion. Based on outcomes encountered at a tertiary center in a developing country, BAV is an effective and safe modality associated with low complication rates comparable to those reported in developed countries.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6681693
spellingShingle Fatme A. Charafeddine
Haytham Bou Houssein
Nadine B. Kibbi
Issam M. El-Rassi
Anas M. Tabbakh
Mohammad S. Abutaqa
Ziad F. Bulbul
Nour K. Younis
Mariam T. Arabi
Fadi F. Bitar
Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Experience at a Tertiary Center in a Developing Country
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Experience at a Tertiary Center in a Developing Country
title_full Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Experience at a Tertiary Center in a Developing Country
title_fullStr Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Experience at a Tertiary Center in a Developing Country
title_full_unstemmed Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Experience at a Tertiary Center in a Developing Country
title_short Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Experience at a Tertiary Center in a Developing Country
title_sort balloon valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis experience at a tertiary center in a developing country
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6681693
work_keys_str_mv AT fatmeacharafeddine balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry
AT haythambouhoussein balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry
AT nadinebkibbi balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry
AT issammelrassi balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry
AT anasmtabbakh balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry
AT mohammadsabutaqa balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry
AT ziadfbulbul balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry
AT nourkyounis balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry
AT mariamtarabi balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry
AT fadifbitar balloonvalvuloplastyforcongenitalaorticstenosisexperienceatatertiarycenterinadevelopingcountry