Le méthaniseur et le paysage
This article proposes to analyse the landscape as a process relating to a collective action mobilising various human, quasi-human, and non-human groups (Akrich et al., 2006), with crossed, conflicting, and converging interests evolving over time, but who are also in situations of competition, indiff...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Projets de Paysage |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/20723 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832095991066525696 |
|---|---|
| author | Fabrice Raffin Camille Dormoy |
| author_facet | Fabrice Raffin Camille Dormoy |
| author_sort | Fabrice Raffin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article proposes to analyse the landscape as a process relating to a collective action mobilising various human, quasi-human, and non-human groups (Akrich et al., 2006), with crossed, conflicting, and converging interests evolving over time, but who are also in situations of competition, indifference, accommodation, and even assimilation (Grafmeyer and Joseph, 2009). A definition of the landscape that therefore involves at the same time the actor-network theories and the sociological interactionist approach (Le Breton, 2012). Using ethnographic participative observation based on our role in the collective action, the aim is to analyse the process of the implementation of a development project contributing to the production of a landscape : the installation of a biogas plant 60 km from Paris. The article focuses on the omnipresence of environmental factors in the organisation of public debate and more precisely on the role of anthropized biodiversity as a framework. The notion of biodiversity is constructed through a systematically anthropomorphic or human-referenced perspective, through the mobilisation of science for the purposes of argumentation. It then intervenes in the constitution of audiences (Céfaï, 2015) and of problematic situations relating to land use planning, which are implicitly part of a struggle to maintain a landscape in its existing state. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-48ad91bf06334fea86ab31f43e721278 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1969-6124 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Projets de Paysage |
| spelling | doaj-art-48ad91bf06334fea86ab31f43e7212782025-02-05T16:21:08ZfraAgrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP LilleProjets de Paysage1969-61242021-09-012410.4000/paysage.20723Le méthaniseur et le paysageFabrice RaffinCamille DormoyThis article proposes to analyse the landscape as a process relating to a collective action mobilising various human, quasi-human, and non-human groups (Akrich et al., 2006), with crossed, conflicting, and converging interests evolving over time, but who are also in situations of competition, indifference, accommodation, and even assimilation (Grafmeyer and Joseph, 2009). A definition of the landscape that therefore involves at the same time the actor-network theories and the sociological interactionist approach (Le Breton, 2012). Using ethnographic participative observation based on our role in the collective action, the aim is to analyse the process of the implementation of a development project contributing to the production of a landscape : the installation of a biogas plant 60 km from Paris. The article focuses on the omnipresence of environmental factors in the organisation of public debate and more precisely on the role of anthropized biodiversity as a framework. The notion of biodiversity is constructed through a systematically anthropomorphic or human-referenced perspective, through the mobilisation of science for the purposes of argumentation. It then intervenes in the constitution of audiences (Céfaï, 2015) and of problematic situations relating to land use planning, which are implicitly part of a struggle to maintain a landscape in its existing state.https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/20723biodiversitypublic policiescollective actionproblematic planning situationmechanisationactor-network landscapes |
| spellingShingle | Fabrice Raffin Camille Dormoy Le méthaniseur et le paysage Projets de Paysage biodiversity public policies collective action problematic planning situation mechanisation actor-network landscapes |
| title | Le méthaniseur et le paysage |
| title_full | Le méthaniseur et le paysage |
| title_fullStr | Le méthaniseur et le paysage |
| title_full_unstemmed | Le méthaniseur et le paysage |
| title_short | Le méthaniseur et le paysage |
| title_sort | le methaniseur et le paysage |
| topic | biodiversity public policies collective action problematic planning situation mechanisation actor-network landscapes |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/20723 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fabriceraffin lemethaniseuretlepaysage AT camilledormoy lemethaniseuretlepaysage |