Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer

The purpose of our study was to compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with three classes of pathological Gleason scores (GS). Patients whose GS met these criteria (GS 3+3, GS 3+4, and GS 4+3) were included in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajakumar Nagarajan, Daniel Margolis, Steven Raman, Ke Sheng, Christopher King, Robert Reiter, M. Albert Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Advances in Urology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/374805
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562802019008512
author Rajakumar Nagarajan
Daniel Margolis
Steven Raman
Ke Sheng
Christopher King
Robert Reiter
M. Albert Thomas
author_facet Rajakumar Nagarajan
Daniel Margolis
Steven Raman
Ke Sheng
Christopher King
Robert Reiter
M. Albert Thomas
author_sort Rajakumar Nagarajan
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of our study was to compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with three classes of pathological Gleason scores (GS). Patients whose GS met these criteria (GS 3+3, GS 3+4, and GS 4+3) were included in this study. The DWI was performed using 𝑏 values of 0, 50, and 400 s/mm2 in 44 patients using an endorectal coil on a 1.5T MRI scanner. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated from the DWI data of patients with three different Gleason scores. In patients with a high-grade Gleason score (4+3), the ADC values were lower in the peripheral gland tissue, pathologically determined as tumor compared to low grade (3+3 and 3+4). The mean and standard deviation of the ADC values for patients with GS 3+3, GS 3+4, and GS 4+3 were 1.135±0.119, 0.976±0.103 and 0.831±0.087 mm2/sec. The ADC values were statistically significant (𝑃<0.05) between the three different scores with a trend of decreasing ADC values with increasing Gleason scores by one-way ANOVA method. This study shows that the DWI-derived ADC values may help differentiate aggressive from low-grade PCa.
format Article
id doaj-art-48a2d8f549de4a9c82e9ad3344236150
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6369
1687-6377
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Urology
spelling doaj-art-48a2d8f549de4a9c82e9ad33442361502025-02-03T01:21:47ZengWileyAdvances in Urology1687-63691687-63772012-01-01201210.1155/2012/374805374805Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate CancerRajakumar Nagarajan0Daniel Margolis1Steven Raman2Ke Sheng3Christopher King4Robert Reiter5M. Albert Thomas6Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721, USADepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721, USADepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721, USADepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721, USADepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721, USAThe purpose of our study was to compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with three classes of pathological Gleason scores (GS). Patients whose GS met these criteria (GS 3+3, GS 3+4, and GS 4+3) were included in this study. The DWI was performed using 𝑏 values of 0, 50, and 400 s/mm2 in 44 patients using an endorectal coil on a 1.5T MRI scanner. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated from the DWI data of patients with three different Gleason scores. In patients with a high-grade Gleason score (4+3), the ADC values were lower in the peripheral gland tissue, pathologically determined as tumor compared to low grade (3+3 and 3+4). The mean and standard deviation of the ADC values for patients with GS 3+3, GS 3+4, and GS 4+3 were 1.135±0.119, 0.976±0.103 and 0.831±0.087 mm2/sec. The ADC values were statistically significant (𝑃<0.05) between the three different scores with a trend of decreasing ADC values with increasing Gleason scores by one-way ANOVA method. This study shows that the DWI-derived ADC values may help differentiate aggressive from low-grade PCa.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/374805
spellingShingle Rajakumar Nagarajan
Daniel Margolis
Steven Raman
Ke Sheng
Christopher King
Robert Reiter
M. Albert Thomas
Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer
Advances in Urology
title Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer
title_full Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer
title_short Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer
title_sort correlation of gleason scores with diffusion weighted imaging findings of prostate cancer
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/374805
work_keys_str_mv AT rajakumarnagarajan correlationofgleasonscoreswithdiffusionweightedimagingfindingsofprostatecancer
AT danielmargolis correlationofgleasonscoreswithdiffusionweightedimagingfindingsofprostatecancer
AT stevenraman correlationofgleasonscoreswithdiffusionweightedimagingfindingsofprostatecancer
AT kesheng correlationofgleasonscoreswithdiffusionweightedimagingfindingsofprostatecancer
AT christopherking correlationofgleasonscoreswithdiffusionweightedimagingfindingsofprostatecancer
AT robertreiter correlationofgleasonscoreswithdiffusionweightedimagingfindingsofprostatecancer
AT malbertthomas correlationofgleasonscoreswithdiffusionweightedimagingfindingsofprostatecancer