Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic review

Background: The rapid development and distribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines has been essential in containing the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic around the globe. For ongoing and future immunization campaigns globally, there is a need to evaluate the impact of population demographics such as age and sex, on va...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle Bachmann, Nejla Gültekin, Zeno Stanga, Jan S. Fehr, Ismail I. Ülgür, Patricia Schlagenhauf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:New Microbes and New Infections
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297524003354
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589973952397312
author Michelle Bachmann
Nejla Gültekin
Zeno Stanga
Jan S. Fehr
Ismail I. Ülgür
Patricia Schlagenhauf
author_facet Michelle Bachmann
Nejla Gültekin
Zeno Stanga
Jan S. Fehr
Ismail I. Ülgür
Patricia Schlagenhauf
author_sort Michelle Bachmann
collection DOAJ
description Background: The rapid development and distribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines has been essential in containing the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic around the globe. For ongoing and future immunization campaigns globally, there is a need to evaluate the impact of population demographics such as age and sex, on vaccine efficacy and safety. Methods: This systematic review (PROSPERO ID CRD42023328245) conducted according to PRISMA guidelines evaluates the impact of age and sex on the safety and efficacy of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations administrated in 15 studies that were chosen according to strict criteria. The ROBIS tool was applied to evaluate the robustness and the quality of the studies included in the review. Results: After screening, 15 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The results showed that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines typically elicit robust immune responses, and that younger people have higher antibody levels. Comparing the sexes reveals that higher immunological responses were induced in females, and mild to moderate adverse effects (such as injection site discomfort, exhaustion, and headaches) were also more frequently reported in women. Despite these variations, COVID-19 vaccines have been found to be safe to use across diverse populations, which supports their extensive use in public health initiatives. Conclusion: Our results suggests that tailored vaccination may achieve maximum effectiveness and better tolerability depending on age and sex. Currently study results are rarely stratified by age and sex and this is a deficit in clinical trial publications. More research is needed to elucidate the biological mechanisms underlying the variations in vaccine responses according to age and sex.
format Article
id doaj-art-48078bd711234acd9ef5b1ea3c020d5b
institution Kabale University
issn 2052-2975
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series New Microbes and New Infections
spelling doaj-art-48078bd711234acd9ef5b1ea3c020d5b2025-01-24T04:44:54ZengElsevierNew Microbes and New Infections2052-29752025-02-0163101551Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic reviewMichelle Bachmann0Nejla Gültekin1Zeno Stanga2Jan S. Fehr3Ismail I. Ülgür4Patricia Schlagenhauf5Department of Global and Public Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers' Health, Centre of Competence for Military Medicine Biology, University of Zürich, Switzerland; Swiss Armed Forces, Medical Services, Ittigen, Bern, Switzerland; Corresponding author. Department of Global and Public Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers' Health, Centre of Competence for Military Medicine Biology, University of Zürich, Switzerland.Swiss Armed Forces, Medical Services, Ittigen, Bern, SwitzerlandSwiss Armed Forces, Medical Services, Ittigen, Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Global and Public Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers' Health, Centre of Competence for Military Medicine Biology, University of Zürich, SwitzerlandSwiss Armed Forces, Medical Services, Ittigen, Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Global and Public Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers' Health, Centre of Competence for Military Medicine Biology, University of Zürich, SwitzerlandBackground: The rapid development and distribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines has been essential in containing the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic around the globe. For ongoing and future immunization campaigns globally, there is a need to evaluate the impact of population demographics such as age and sex, on vaccine efficacy and safety. Methods: This systematic review (PROSPERO ID CRD42023328245) conducted according to PRISMA guidelines evaluates the impact of age and sex on the safety and efficacy of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations administrated in 15 studies that were chosen according to strict criteria. The ROBIS tool was applied to evaluate the robustness and the quality of the studies included in the review. Results: After screening, 15 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The results showed that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines typically elicit robust immune responses, and that younger people have higher antibody levels. Comparing the sexes reveals that higher immunological responses were induced in females, and mild to moderate adverse effects (such as injection site discomfort, exhaustion, and headaches) were also more frequently reported in women. Despite these variations, COVID-19 vaccines have been found to be safe to use across diverse populations, which supports their extensive use in public health initiatives. Conclusion: Our results suggests that tailored vaccination may achieve maximum effectiveness and better tolerability depending on age and sex. Currently study results are rarely stratified by age and sex and this is a deficit in clinical trial publications. More research is needed to elucidate the biological mechanisms underlying the variations in vaccine responses according to age and sex.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297524003354
spellingShingle Michelle Bachmann
Nejla Gültekin
Zeno Stanga
Jan S. Fehr
Ismail I. Ülgür
Patricia Schlagenhauf
Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic review
New Microbes and New Infections
title Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic review
title_full Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic review
title_fullStr Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic review
title_short Disparities in response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to sex and age: A systematic review
title_sort disparities in response to mrna sars cov 2 vaccines according to sex and age a systematic review
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297524003354
work_keys_str_mv AT michellebachmann disparitiesinresponsetomrnasarscov2vaccinesaccordingtosexandageasystematicreview
AT nejlagultekin disparitiesinresponsetomrnasarscov2vaccinesaccordingtosexandageasystematicreview
AT zenostanga disparitiesinresponsetomrnasarscov2vaccinesaccordingtosexandageasystematicreview
AT jansfehr disparitiesinresponsetomrnasarscov2vaccinesaccordingtosexandageasystematicreview
AT ismailiulgur disparitiesinresponsetomrnasarscov2vaccinesaccordingtosexandageasystematicreview
AT patriciaschlagenhauf disparitiesinresponsetomrnasarscov2vaccinesaccordingtosexandageasystematicreview