Approaches for difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DEC): a Japanese expert consensus
Abstract Background Seizure threshold increases with age and the frequency of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Therefore, therapeutic seizures can be difficult to induce, even at maximum stimulus charge with available ECT devices. Such cases are known as difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsiv...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Annals of General Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-024-00543-9 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832594474765647872 |
---|---|
author | Yoshiteru Takekita Taro Suwa Kazuyuki Yasuda Hirotsugu Kawashima Wataru Omori Naoki Kurimoto Takashi Tsuboi Takamasa Noda Nobuatsu Aoki Ken Wada Ken Inada Minoru Takebayash Expert Consensus Development Working Group Electroconvulsive Therapy Committee Japanese Society of General Hospital Psychiatry |
author_facet | Yoshiteru Takekita Taro Suwa Kazuyuki Yasuda Hirotsugu Kawashima Wataru Omori Naoki Kurimoto Takashi Tsuboi Takamasa Noda Nobuatsu Aoki Ken Wada Ken Inada Minoru Takebayash Expert Consensus Development Working Group Electroconvulsive Therapy Committee Japanese Society of General Hospital Psychiatry |
author_sort | Yoshiteru Takekita |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Seizure threshold increases with age and the frequency of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Therefore, therapeutic seizures can be difficult to induce, even at maximum stimulus charge with available ECT devices. Such cases are known as difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DECs). However, no clinical guidelines exist for DECs; thus, clinicians often face difficulties determining treatment strategies. This study aimed to obtain a consensus among clinical experts regarding the treatment of DECs. Methods We asked Japanese ECT experts to rate 14 approaches under six conditions of DECs on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = “disagree” to 9 = “agree”). Based on responses from 195 experts, the approaches were classified as first-line (95% confidence interval mean ≥ 6.5), second-line (mean, 3.5–6.5), or third-line strategies (mean < 3.5). Approaches rated 9 points by at least 50% of the respondents were considered “treatments of choice.” Results To avoid difficult seizure induction, dose reduction of benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA) (8.33 ± 1.25), dose reduction or discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) or other drugs that may make seizure induction difficult (8.16 ± 1.18), and ensure hyperventilation (7.95 ± 1.47) were classified as treatments of choice. First-line treatment strategies were BRZA discontinuation (7.89 ± 1.45), stimulation timing adjustment (7.00 ± 2.00), and anesthetic dose reduction (6.93 ± 1.94). Dose reduction or discontinuation of AEDs or other drugs that might make seizure induction difficult and ensure hyperventilation were the treatments of choice across all patient conditions. The results of rating approaches for patients with mood disorders and schizophrenia were similar, with differences observed among the approaches for patients with catatonia, high risk of cognitive impairment, and cardiovascular events. Conclusions ECT expert recommendations are useful and can assist in clinical decision-making. Our results suggest that while some strategies are applicable across all conditions, others should be tailored to meet the specific needs of patients. These recommendations should be further evaluated in future clinical studies. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-47761002bf6f4a31b7d00b00eb8ed7e0 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1744-859X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Annals of General Psychiatry |
spelling | doaj-art-47761002bf6f4a31b7d00b00eb8ed7e02025-01-19T12:34:07ZengBMCAnnals of General Psychiatry1744-859X2025-01-012411910.1186/s12991-024-00543-9Approaches for difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DEC): a Japanese expert consensusYoshiteru Takekita0Taro Suwa1Kazuyuki Yasuda2Hirotsugu Kawashima3Wataru Omori4Naoki Kurimoto5Takashi Tsuboi6Takamasa Noda7Nobuatsu Aoki8Ken Wada9Ken Inada10Minoru Takebayash11Expert Consensus Development Working GroupElectroconvulsive Therapy CommitteeJapanese Society of General Hospital PsychiatryDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Kansai Medical UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry, Kyoto University HospitalFaculty of Medicine, Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of YamanashiDepartment of Psychiatry, Kyoto University HospitalDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima UniversityShigasato HospitalDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Kyorin University School of MedicineDepartment of Psychiatry, National Center of Neurology and PsychiatryDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Kansai Medical UniversityDepartment of Psychiatry, Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima City Hospital OrganizationDepartment of Psychiatry, Kitasato University School of MedicineDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto UniversityAbstract Background Seizure threshold increases with age and the frequency of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Therefore, therapeutic seizures can be difficult to induce, even at maximum stimulus charge with available ECT devices. Such cases are known as difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DECs). However, no clinical guidelines exist for DECs; thus, clinicians often face difficulties determining treatment strategies. This study aimed to obtain a consensus among clinical experts regarding the treatment of DECs. Methods We asked Japanese ECT experts to rate 14 approaches under six conditions of DECs on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = “disagree” to 9 = “agree”). Based on responses from 195 experts, the approaches were classified as first-line (95% confidence interval mean ≥ 6.5), second-line (mean, 3.5–6.5), or third-line strategies (mean < 3.5). Approaches rated 9 points by at least 50% of the respondents were considered “treatments of choice.” Results To avoid difficult seizure induction, dose reduction of benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA) (8.33 ± 1.25), dose reduction or discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) or other drugs that may make seizure induction difficult (8.16 ± 1.18), and ensure hyperventilation (7.95 ± 1.47) were classified as treatments of choice. First-line treatment strategies were BRZA discontinuation (7.89 ± 1.45), stimulation timing adjustment (7.00 ± 2.00), and anesthetic dose reduction (6.93 ± 1.94). Dose reduction or discontinuation of AEDs or other drugs that might make seizure induction difficult and ensure hyperventilation were the treatments of choice across all patient conditions. The results of rating approaches for patients with mood disorders and schizophrenia were similar, with differences observed among the approaches for patients with catatonia, high risk of cognitive impairment, and cardiovascular events. Conclusions ECT expert recommendations are useful and can assist in clinical decision-making. Our results suggest that while some strategies are applicable across all conditions, others should be tailored to meet the specific needs of patients. These recommendations should be further evaluated in future clinical studies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-024-00543-9Electroconvulsive therapySeizure thresholdDifficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy casesExpert consensus |
spellingShingle | Yoshiteru Takekita Taro Suwa Kazuyuki Yasuda Hirotsugu Kawashima Wataru Omori Naoki Kurimoto Takashi Tsuboi Takamasa Noda Nobuatsu Aoki Ken Wada Ken Inada Minoru Takebayash Expert Consensus Development Working Group Electroconvulsive Therapy Committee Japanese Society of General Hospital Psychiatry Approaches for difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DEC): a Japanese expert consensus Annals of General Psychiatry Electroconvulsive therapy Seizure threshold Difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases Expert consensus |
title | Approaches for difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DEC): a Japanese expert consensus |
title_full | Approaches for difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DEC): a Japanese expert consensus |
title_fullStr | Approaches for difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DEC): a Japanese expert consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | Approaches for difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DEC): a Japanese expert consensus |
title_short | Approaches for difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases (DEC): a Japanese expert consensus |
title_sort | approaches for difficult to induce seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases dec a japanese expert consensus |
topic | Electroconvulsive therapy Seizure threshold Difficult-to-induce-seizures electroconvulsive therapy cases Expert consensus |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-024-00543-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoshiterutakekita approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT tarosuwa approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT kazuyukiyasuda approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT hirotsugukawashima approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT wataruomori approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT naokikurimoto approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT takashitsuboi approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT takamasanoda approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT nobuatsuaoki approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT kenwada approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT keninada approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT minorutakebayash approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT expertconsensusdevelopmentworkinggroup approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT electroconvulsivetherapycommittee approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus AT japanesesocietyofgeneralhospitalpsychiatry approachesfordifficulttoinduceseizureselectroconvulsivetherapycasesdecajapaneseexpertconsensus |