A Multi-Scale Convolutional Residual Time-Frequency Calibration Method for Low-Accuracy Air Pollution Data
Air pollution concerns have led to the widespread deployment of air quality monitoring stations. While high-cost government stations provide accurate data, their deployment is limited, whereas low-cost sensors offer widespread coverage but with lower accuracy. To enhance the accuracy of measurement...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/2/935 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Air pollution concerns have led to the widespread deployment of air quality monitoring stations. While high-cost government stations provide accurate data, their deployment is limited, whereas low-cost sensors offer widespread coverage but with lower accuracy. To enhance the accuracy of measurement data from low-cost air monitoring sensors, this study proposes a Multi-Scale Convolutional Residual Time-Frequency Calibration Method (MCRTF-CM), focusing on the PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensor as an example. This method leverages multi-scale convolution in the feature extractor to capture diverse features at various scales using parallel convolutional kernels. Residual connections merge the original and multi-scale features, preserving the initial input for enhanced stability. The calibration module employs Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) to capture long-term dependencies in time-series data through reset and update gates. Additionally, the Frequency Enhanced Channel Attention Mechanism (FECAM) uses Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) to convert time-domain data to frequency-domain, assigning weights to different frequency components to enhance key features and suppress irrelevant ones. Experimental results demonstrate that MCRTF-CM outperforms optimal Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, reducing RMSE, MAE, MSE, and MAPE by 13.59%, 14.04%, 25.33%, and 8.22%, respectively, indicating its better performance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2076-3417 |