Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers
Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of ceramic veneers with digital die spacer settings at 20, 40, and 100 µm. Materials and Methods. Eighteen milled lithium disilicate microdiscs (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were divided into three groups (n = 6) according to...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4593131 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832545915739570176 |
---|---|
author | Sherine Mohamed Farag Mona Mohamed Ghoneim Rania Reda Afifi |
author_facet | Sherine Mohamed Farag Mona Mohamed Ghoneim Rania Reda Afifi |
author_sort | Sherine Mohamed Farag |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of ceramic veneers with digital die spacer settings at 20, 40, and 100 µm. Materials and Methods. Eighteen milled lithium disilicate microdiscs (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were divided into three groups (n = 6) according to their digital die spacer settings: group A = 20 µm, group B = 40 µm, and group C = 100 µm. Six randomly selected sound maxillary premolars received three microdiscs each. Each microdisc was 1 mm in diameter and 1 mm in height. The buccal surfaces of the premolars were prepared with a 0.5 mm depth in enamel. After cementation, the specimens were thermocycled for 2,500 cycles between 5 and 55°C. Microshear bond strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine until bonding failure. Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, and chi-square test with a 5% alpha error and 80% study power. Results. The mean microshear bond strength values were calculated in MPa for group A = 31.91 ± 12.41, group B = 29.58 ± 5.03, and group C = 13.85 ± 4.12. One-way ANOVA (p≤0.05) showed a statistically significant difference in microshear bond strength among the three groups. Tukey’s post hoc test showed significant differences between groups A and C (p=0.004) and between groups B and C (p=0.011). The failure modes were presented as cohesive, adhesive, and mixed failures. Chi-square test indicated that the failure mode distribution was not significantly different among the three groups (p=0.970). Conclusion. Higher digital die spacer settings decrease the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate veneers. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-47002229a32a46e8b27de3c7a502defa |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8728 1687-8736 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Dentistry |
spelling | doaj-art-47002229a32a46e8b27de3c7a502defa2025-02-03T07:24:23ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362021-01-01202110.1155/2021/45931314593131Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate VeneersSherine Mohamed Farag0Mona Mohamed Ghoneim1Rania Reda Afifi2Conservative Dentistry Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptConservative Dentistry Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptConservative Dentistry Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptAim. The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of ceramic veneers with digital die spacer settings at 20, 40, and 100 µm. Materials and Methods. Eighteen milled lithium disilicate microdiscs (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were divided into three groups (n = 6) according to their digital die spacer settings: group A = 20 µm, group B = 40 µm, and group C = 100 µm. Six randomly selected sound maxillary premolars received three microdiscs each. Each microdisc was 1 mm in diameter and 1 mm in height. The buccal surfaces of the premolars were prepared with a 0.5 mm depth in enamel. After cementation, the specimens were thermocycled for 2,500 cycles between 5 and 55°C. Microshear bond strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine until bonding failure. Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, and chi-square test with a 5% alpha error and 80% study power. Results. The mean microshear bond strength values were calculated in MPa for group A = 31.91 ± 12.41, group B = 29.58 ± 5.03, and group C = 13.85 ± 4.12. One-way ANOVA (p≤0.05) showed a statistically significant difference in microshear bond strength among the three groups. Tukey’s post hoc test showed significant differences between groups A and C (p=0.004) and between groups B and C (p=0.011). The failure modes were presented as cohesive, adhesive, and mixed failures. Chi-square test indicated that the failure mode distribution was not significantly different among the three groups (p=0.970). Conclusion. Higher digital die spacer settings decrease the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate veneers.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4593131 |
spellingShingle | Sherine Mohamed Farag Mona Mohamed Ghoneim Rania Reda Afifi Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers International Journal of Dentistry |
title | Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers |
title_full | Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers |
title_fullStr | Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers |
title_short | Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers |
title_sort | effect of die spacer thickness on the microshear bond strength of cad cam lithium disilicate veneers |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4593131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sherinemohamedfarag effectofdiespacerthicknessonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcamlithiumdisilicateveneers AT monamohamedghoneim effectofdiespacerthicknessonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcamlithiumdisilicateveneers AT raniaredaafifi effectofdiespacerthicknessonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcamlithiumdisilicateveneers |