Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers

Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of ceramic veneers with digital die spacer settings at 20, 40, and 100 µm. Materials and Methods. Eighteen milled lithium disilicate microdiscs (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were divided into three groups (n = 6) according to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sherine Mohamed Farag, Mona Mohamed Ghoneim, Rania Reda Afifi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4593131
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545915739570176
author Sherine Mohamed Farag
Mona Mohamed Ghoneim
Rania Reda Afifi
author_facet Sherine Mohamed Farag
Mona Mohamed Ghoneim
Rania Reda Afifi
author_sort Sherine Mohamed Farag
collection DOAJ
description Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of ceramic veneers with digital die spacer settings at 20, 40, and 100 µm. Materials and Methods. Eighteen milled lithium disilicate microdiscs (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were divided into three groups (n = 6) according to their digital die spacer settings: group A = 20 µm, group B = 40 µm, and group C = 100 µm. Six randomly selected sound maxillary premolars received three microdiscs each. Each microdisc was 1 mm in diameter and 1 mm in height. The buccal surfaces of the premolars were prepared with a 0.5 mm depth in enamel. After cementation, the specimens were thermocycled for 2,500 cycles between 5 and 55°C. Microshear bond strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine until bonding failure. Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, and chi-square test with a 5% alpha error and 80% study power. Results. The mean microshear bond strength values were calculated in MPa for group A = 31.91 ± 12.41, group B = 29.58 ± 5.03, and group C = 13.85 ± 4.12. One-way ANOVA (p≤0.05) showed a statistically significant difference in microshear bond strength among the three groups. Tukey’s post hoc test showed significant differences between groups A and C (p=0.004) and between groups B and C (p=0.011). The failure modes were presented as cohesive, adhesive, and mixed failures. Chi-square test indicated that the failure mode distribution was not significantly different among the three groups (p=0.970). Conclusion. Higher digital die spacer settings decrease the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate veneers.
format Article
id doaj-art-47002229a32a46e8b27de3c7a502defa
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-47002229a32a46e8b27de3c7a502defa2025-02-03T07:24:23ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362021-01-01202110.1155/2021/45931314593131Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate VeneersSherine Mohamed Farag0Mona Mohamed Ghoneim1Rania Reda Afifi2Conservative Dentistry Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptConservative Dentistry Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptConservative Dentistry Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptAim. The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of ceramic veneers with digital die spacer settings at 20, 40, and 100 µm. Materials and Methods. Eighteen milled lithium disilicate microdiscs (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were divided into three groups (n = 6) according to their digital die spacer settings: group A = 20 µm, group B = 40 µm, and group C = 100 µm. Six randomly selected sound maxillary premolars received three microdiscs each. Each microdisc was 1 mm in diameter and 1 mm in height. The buccal surfaces of the premolars were prepared with a 0.5 mm depth in enamel. After cementation, the specimens were thermocycled for 2,500 cycles between 5 and 55°C. Microshear bond strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine until bonding failure. Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, and chi-square test with a 5% alpha error and 80% study power. Results. The mean microshear bond strength values were calculated in MPa for group A = 31.91 ± 12.41, group B = 29.58 ± 5.03, and group C = 13.85 ± 4.12. One-way ANOVA (p≤0.05) showed a statistically significant difference in microshear bond strength among the three groups. Tukey’s post hoc test showed significant differences between groups A and C (p=0.004) and between groups B and C (p=0.011). The failure modes were presented as cohesive, adhesive, and mixed failures. Chi-square test indicated that the failure mode distribution was not significantly different among the three groups (p=0.970). Conclusion. Higher digital die spacer settings decrease the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate veneers.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4593131
spellingShingle Sherine Mohamed Farag
Mona Mohamed Ghoneim
Rania Reda Afifi
Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers
International Journal of Dentistry
title Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers
title_full Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers
title_fullStr Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers
title_short Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers
title_sort effect of die spacer thickness on the microshear bond strength of cad cam lithium disilicate veneers
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4593131
work_keys_str_mv AT sherinemohamedfarag effectofdiespacerthicknessonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcamlithiumdisilicateveneers
AT monamohamedghoneim effectofdiespacerthicknessonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcamlithiumdisilicateveneers
AT raniaredaafifi effectofdiespacerthicknessonthemicroshearbondstrengthofcadcamlithiumdisilicateveneers