Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation

Objective: This study was aimed to determine the amount of apically extruded debris using different final irrigation activation techniques.Methods: The mesial roots of 70 extracted mandibular molar teeth were included. The mesiobuccal roots were instrumented to size 40/.06 with a reciprocal system f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mirze Muhammet Özen, Oğuzhan Ünal, Mine Büker, Meltem Sümbüllü
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Atatürk University 2025-01-01
Series:Current Research in Dental Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3731303
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544331876007936
author Mirze Muhammet Özen
Oğuzhan Ünal
Mine Büker
Meltem Sümbüllü
author_facet Mirze Muhammet Özen
Oğuzhan Ünal
Mine Büker
Meltem Sümbüllü
author_sort Mirze Muhammet Özen
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study was aimed to determine the amount of apically extruded debris using different final irrigation activation techniques.Methods: The mesial roots of 70 extracted mandibular molar teeth were included. The mesiobuccal roots were instrumented to size 40/.06 with a reciprocal system file and divided into five groups according to the final irrigation activation technique used: EDDY, EndoActivator (EA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), manual dynamic agitation (MDA) or needle irrigation (NI). The extruded debris was collected in Eppendorf tubes and stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The results were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (P=.05).Results: EDDY and the EA caused significantly more apical debris extrusion (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences between EDDY and the EA (P > .05). NI caused less extrusion, but there were no statistically significant differences between PUI, MDA and NI (P > .05).Conclusion: EDDY and the EA were associated with significantly higher apical extrusion debris extrusion.Keywords: debris extrusion, EDDY, Endoactivator, irrigation activation, manual dynamic agitation, ultrasonic irrigation.
format Article
id doaj-art-46c6e43bcb89405eb8f9c4833ec4279c
institution Kabale University
issn 2822-2555
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Atatürk University
record_format Article
series Current Research in Dental Sciences
spelling doaj-art-46c6e43bcb89405eb8f9c4833ec4279c2025-02-03T10:38:09ZengAtatürk UniversityCurrent Research in Dental Sciences2822-25552025-01-01351364010.17567/currresdentsci.143759655Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic AgitationMirze Muhammet Özen0https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5675-7287Oğuzhan Ünal1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6709-7837Mine Büker2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4833-4547Meltem Sümbüllü3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2647-7988ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİObjective: This study was aimed to determine the amount of apically extruded debris using different final irrigation activation techniques.Methods: The mesial roots of 70 extracted mandibular molar teeth were included. The mesiobuccal roots were instrumented to size 40/.06 with a reciprocal system file and divided into five groups according to the final irrigation activation technique used: EDDY, EndoActivator (EA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), manual dynamic agitation (MDA) or needle irrigation (NI). The extruded debris was collected in Eppendorf tubes and stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The results were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (P=.05).Results: EDDY and the EA caused significantly more apical debris extrusion (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences between EDDY and the EA (P > .05). NI caused less extrusion, but there were no statistically significant differences between PUI, MDA and NI (P > .05).Conclusion: EDDY and the EA were associated with significantly higher apical extrusion debris extrusion.Keywords: debris extrusion, EDDY, Endoactivator, irrigation activation, manual dynamic agitation, ultrasonic irrigation.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3731303debris ektrüzyonuirrigasyon aktivasyonueddyendoaktivatörmanuel dinamik aktivasyonultrasonik irrigasyondebris extrusionirrigation activationeddyendoactivatormanual dynamic agitationultrasonic irrigation
spellingShingle Mirze Muhammet Özen
Oğuzhan Ünal
Mine Büker
Meltem Sümbüllü
Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation
Current Research in Dental Sciences
debris ektrüzyonu
irrigasyon aktivasyonu
eddy
endoaktivatör
manuel dinamik aktivasyon
ultrasonik irrigasyon
debris extrusion
irrigation activation
eddy
endoactivator
manual dynamic agitation
ultrasonic irrigation
title Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation
title_full Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation
title_fullStr Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation
title_short Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation
title_sort comparison of apical debris extrusion using eddy endoactivator ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic agitation
topic debris ektrüzyonu
irrigasyon aktivasyonu
eddy
endoaktivatör
manuel dinamik aktivasyon
ultrasonik irrigasyon
debris extrusion
irrigation activation
eddy
endoactivator
manual dynamic agitation
ultrasonic irrigation
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3731303
work_keys_str_mv AT mirzemuhammetozen comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionusingeddyendoactivatorultrasonicirrigationandmanualdynamicagitation
AT oguzhanunal comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionusingeddyendoactivatorultrasonicirrigationandmanualdynamicagitation
AT minebuker comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionusingeddyendoactivatorultrasonicirrigationandmanualdynamicagitation
AT meltemsumbullu comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionusingeddyendoactivatorultrasonicirrigationandmanualdynamicagitation