Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation
Objective: This study was aimed to determine the amount of apically extruded debris using different final irrigation activation techniques.Methods: The mesial roots of 70 extracted mandibular molar teeth were included. The mesiobuccal roots were instrumented to size 40/.06 with a reciprocal system f...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Atatürk University
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Current Research in Dental Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3731303 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832544331876007936 |
---|---|
author | Mirze Muhammet Özen Oğuzhan Ünal Mine Büker Meltem Sümbüllü |
author_facet | Mirze Muhammet Özen Oğuzhan Ünal Mine Büker Meltem Sümbüllü |
author_sort | Mirze Muhammet Özen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective: This study was aimed to determine the amount of apically extruded debris using different final irrigation activation techniques.Methods: The mesial roots of 70 extracted mandibular molar teeth were included. The mesiobuccal roots were instrumented to size 40/.06 with a reciprocal system file and divided into five groups according to the final irrigation activation technique used: EDDY, EndoActivator (EA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), manual dynamic agitation (MDA) or needle irrigation (NI). The extruded debris was collected in Eppendorf tubes and stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The results were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (P=.05).Results: EDDY and the EA caused significantly more apical debris extrusion (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences between EDDY and the EA (P > .05). NI caused less extrusion, but there were no statistically significant differences between PUI, MDA and NI (P > .05).Conclusion: EDDY and the EA were associated with significantly higher apical extrusion debris extrusion.Keywords: debris extrusion, EDDY, Endoactivator, irrigation activation, manual dynamic agitation, ultrasonic irrigation. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-46c6e43bcb89405eb8f9c4833ec4279c |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2822-2555 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Atatürk University |
record_format | Article |
series | Current Research in Dental Sciences |
spelling | doaj-art-46c6e43bcb89405eb8f9c4833ec4279c2025-02-03T10:38:09ZengAtatürk UniversityCurrent Research in Dental Sciences2822-25552025-01-01351364010.17567/currresdentsci.143759655Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic AgitationMirze Muhammet Özen0https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5675-7287Oğuzhan Ünal1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6709-7837Mine Büker2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4833-4547Meltem Sümbüllü3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2647-7988ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİObjective: This study was aimed to determine the amount of apically extruded debris using different final irrigation activation techniques.Methods: The mesial roots of 70 extracted mandibular molar teeth were included. The mesiobuccal roots were instrumented to size 40/.06 with a reciprocal system file and divided into five groups according to the final irrigation activation technique used: EDDY, EndoActivator (EA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), manual dynamic agitation (MDA) or needle irrigation (NI). The extruded debris was collected in Eppendorf tubes and stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The results were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (P=.05).Results: EDDY and the EA caused significantly more apical debris extrusion (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences between EDDY and the EA (P > .05). NI caused less extrusion, but there were no statistically significant differences between PUI, MDA and NI (P > .05).Conclusion: EDDY and the EA were associated with significantly higher apical extrusion debris extrusion.Keywords: debris extrusion, EDDY, Endoactivator, irrigation activation, manual dynamic agitation, ultrasonic irrigation.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3731303debris ektrüzyonuirrigasyon aktivasyonueddyendoaktivatörmanuel dinamik aktivasyonultrasonik irrigasyondebris extrusionirrigation activationeddyendoactivatormanual dynamic agitationultrasonic irrigation |
spellingShingle | Mirze Muhammet Özen Oğuzhan Ünal Mine Büker Meltem Sümbüllü Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation Current Research in Dental Sciences debris ektrüzyonu irrigasyon aktivasyonu eddy endoaktivatör manuel dinamik aktivasyon ultrasonik irrigasyon debris extrusion irrigation activation eddy endoactivator manual dynamic agitation ultrasonic irrigation |
title | Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation |
title_full | Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation |
title_short | Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using EDDY, EndoActivator, Ultrasonic Irrigation and Manual Dynamic Agitation |
title_sort | comparison of apical debris extrusion using eddy endoactivator ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic agitation |
topic | debris ektrüzyonu irrigasyon aktivasyonu eddy endoaktivatör manuel dinamik aktivasyon ultrasonik irrigasyon debris extrusion irrigation activation eddy endoactivator manual dynamic agitation ultrasonic irrigation |
url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3731303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mirzemuhammetozen comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionusingeddyendoactivatorultrasonicirrigationandmanualdynamicagitation AT oguzhanunal comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionusingeddyendoactivatorultrasonicirrigationandmanualdynamicagitation AT minebuker comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionusingeddyendoactivatorultrasonicirrigationandmanualdynamicagitation AT meltemsumbullu comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionusingeddyendoactivatorultrasonicirrigationandmanualdynamicagitation |