Pour une production de connaissances scientifiques mobilisables dans la pratique de terrain : quels types de dynamiques relationnelles entre chercheurs et praticiens ?
According to the positivist paradigm, the distance between researchers and their object of research is a guarantee of their objectivity, neutrality and autonomy to produce scientific knowledge. However since the seventies, this dualist vision with researchers on one side and social actors on the oth...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée
2017-09-01
|
| Series: | Éducation et Socialisation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/edso/2616 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832578785940078592 |
|---|---|
| author | Amélie Turlais |
| author_facet | Amélie Turlais |
| author_sort | Amélie Turlais |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | According to the positivist paradigm, the distance between researchers and their object of research is a guarantee of their objectivity, neutrality and autonomy to produce scientific knowledge. However since the seventies, this dualist vision with researchers on one side and social actors on the other side is contested. This article questions how pertinent it might be to consider an axiological neutrality as a necessary condition to the production of scientific knowledge. It will be explained that to produce scientific knowledge which can also be useful to practitioners, it should be taken into account three types of relationships between researchers and practitioners : negotiation, acceptance and reflexiveness. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-46bb946a8578417f885cc79bc6724259 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2271-6092 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2017-09-01 |
| publisher | Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Éducation et Socialisation |
| spelling | doaj-art-46bb946a8578417f885cc79bc67242592025-01-30T13:38:12ZfraPresses universitaires de la MéditerranéeÉducation et Socialisation2271-60922017-09-014510.4000/edso.2616Pour une production de connaissances scientifiques mobilisables dans la pratique de terrain : quels types de dynamiques relationnelles entre chercheurs et praticiens ?Amélie TurlaisAccording to the positivist paradigm, the distance between researchers and their object of research is a guarantee of their objectivity, neutrality and autonomy to produce scientific knowledge. However since the seventies, this dualist vision with researchers on one side and social actors on the other side is contested. This article questions how pertinent it might be to consider an axiological neutrality as a necessary condition to the production of scientific knowledge. It will be explained that to produce scientific knowledge which can also be useful to practitioners, it should be taken into account three types of relationships between researchers and practitioners : negotiation, acceptance and reflexiveness.https://journals.openedition.org/edso/2616practical knowledgeScientific knowledgerelationship dynamicnegotiationacceptancereflexiveness |
| spellingShingle | Amélie Turlais Pour une production de connaissances scientifiques mobilisables dans la pratique de terrain : quels types de dynamiques relationnelles entre chercheurs et praticiens ? Éducation et Socialisation practical knowledge Scientific knowledge relationship dynamic negotiation acceptance reflexiveness |
| title | Pour une production de connaissances scientifiques mobilisables dans la pratique de terrain : quels types de dynamiques relationnelles entre chercheurs et praticiens ? |
| title_full | Pour une production de connaissances scientifiques mobilisables dans la pratique de terrain : quels types de dynamiques relationnelles entre chercheurs et praticiens ? |
| title_fullStr | Pour une production de connaissances scientifiques mobilisables dans la pratique de terrain : quels types de dynamiques relationnelles entre chercheurs et praticiens ? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pour une production de connaissances scientifiques mobilisables dans la pratique de terrain : quels types de dynamiques relationnelles entre chercheurs et praticiens ? |
| title_short | Pour une production de connaissances scientifiques mobilisables dans la pratique de terrain : quels types de dynamiques relationnelles entre chercheurs et praticiens ? |
| title_sort | pour une production de connaissances scientifiques mobilisables dans la pratique de terrain quels types de dynamiques relationnelles entre chercheurs et praticiens |
| topic | practical knowledge Scientific knowledge relationship dynamic negotiation acceptance reflexiveness |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/edso/2616 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amelieturlais pouruneproductiondeconnaissancesscientifiquesmobilisablesdanslapratiquedeterrainquelstypesdedynamiquesrelationnellesentrechercheursetpraticiens |