A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting

Objective. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers highly accurate noninvasive screening for Down syndrome. Incorporating it into routine care is complicated. We present our experience implementing a novel program for cfDNA screening, emphasizing patient education, genetic counseling, and resource management....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Wallerstein, Andrea Jelks, Matthew J. Garabedian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Pregnancy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/962720
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566199554146304
author Robert Wallerstein
Andrea Jelks
Matthew J. Garabedian
author_facet Robert Wallerstein
Andrea Jelks
Matthew J. Garabedian
author_sort Robert Wallerstein
collection DOAJ
description Objective. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers highly accurate noninvasive screening for Down syndrome. Incorporating it into routine care is complicated. We present our experience implementing a novel program for cfDNA screening, emphasizing patient education, genetic counseling, and resource management. Study Design. Beginning in January 2013, we initiated a new patient care model in which high-risk patients for aneuploidy received genetic counseling at 12 weeks of gestation. Patients were presented with four pathways for aneuploidy risk assessment and diagnosis: (1) cfDNA; (2) integrated screening; (3) direct-to-invasive testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis); or (4) no first trimester diagnostic testing/screening. Patients underwent follow-up genetic counseling and detailed ultrasound at 18–20 weeks to review first trimester testing and finalize decision for amniocentesis. Results. Counseling and second trimester detailed ultrasound were provided to 163 women. Most selected cfDNA screening (69%) over integrated screening (0.6%), direct-to-invasive testing (14.1%), or no screening (16.6%). Amniocentesis rates decreased following implementation of cfDNA screening (19.0% versus 13.0%, P<0.05). Conclusion. When counseled about screening options, women often chose cfDNA over integrated screening. This program is a model for patient-directed, efficient delivery of a newly available high-level technology in a public health setting. Genetic counseling is an integral part of patient education and determination of plan of care.
format Article
id doaj-art-46a0f0bfbc41402cadafcf63126f7485
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2727
2090-2735
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Pregnancy
spelling doaj-art-46a0f0bfbc41402cadafcf63126f74852025-02-03T01:04:50ZengWileyJournal of Pregnancy2090-27272090-27352014-01-01201410.1155/2014/962720962720A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital SettingRobert Wallerstein0Andrea Jelks1Matthew J. Garabedian2Department of Pediatrics, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, USAMaternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, USAMaternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, USAObjective. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers highly accurate noninvasive screening for Down syndrome. Incorporating it into routine care is complicated. We present our experience implementing a novel program for cfDNA screening, emphasizing patient education, genetic counseling, and resource management. Study Design. Beginning in January 2013, we initiated a new patient care model in which high-risk patients for aneuploidy received genetic counseling at 12 weeks of gestation. Patients were presented with four pathways for aneuploidy risk assessment and diagnosis: (1) cfDNA; (2) integrated screening; (3) direct-to-invasive testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis); or (4) no first trimester diagnostic testing/screening. Patients underwent follow-up genetic counseling and detailed ultrasound at 18–20 weeks to review first trimester testing and finalize decision for amniocentesis. Results. Counseling and second trimester detailed ultrasound were provided to 163 women. Most selected cfDNA screening (69%) over integrated screening (0.6%), direct-to-invasive testing (14.1%), or no screening (16.6%). Amniocentesis rates decreased following implementation of cfDNA screening (19.0% versus 13.0%, P<0.05). Conclusion. When counseled about screening options, women often chose cfDNA over integrated screening. This program is a model for patient-directed, efficient delivery of a newly available high-level technology in a public health setting. Genetic counseling is an integral part of patient education and determination of plan of care.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/962720
spellingShingle Robert Wallerstein
Andrea Jelks
Matthew J. Garabedian
A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
Journal of Pregnancy
title A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_full A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_fullStr A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_full_unstemmed A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_short A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_sort new model for providing cell free dna and risk assessment for chromosome abnormalities in a public hospital setting
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/962720
work_keys_str_mv AT robertwallerstein anewmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT andreajelks anewmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT matthewjgarabedian anewmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT robertwallerstein newmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT andreajelks newmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT matthewjgarabedian newmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting