Selective Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study
Aim. We aimed to develop a prediction model for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes and to evaluate the performance of published prediction tools on our population. Methods. We conducted a cohort study on nondiabetic women < 26 weeks gestation at a level 1 clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Diabetes Research |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2849346 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832567030697426944 |
---|---|
author | Sumaiya Adam Paul Rheeder |
author_facet | Sumaiya Adam Paul Rheeder |
author_sort | Sumaiya Adam |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim. We aimed to develop a prediction model for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes and to evaluate the performance of published prediction tools on our population. Methods. We conducted a cohort study on nondiabetic women < 26 weeks gestation at a level 1 clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. At recruitment, participants completed a questionnaire and random basal glucose and HbA1c were evaluated. A 75 g 2-hour OGTT was scheduled between 24–28 weeks gestation, as per FIGO guidelines. A score was derived using multivariate logistic regression. Published scoring systems were tested by deriving ROC curves. Results. In 554 women, RBG, BMI, and previous baby ≥ 4000 g were significant risk factors included for GDM, which were used to derive a nomogram-based score. The logistic regression model for prediction of GDM had R2 0.143, Somer’s Dxy rank correlation 0.407, and Harrell’s c-score 0.703. HbA1c did not improve predictive value of the nomogram at any threshold (e.g,. at probability > 10%, 25.6% of cases were detected without the HbA1c, and 25.8% of cases would have been detected with the HbA1c). The 9 published scoring systems performed poorly. Conclusion. We propose a nomogram-based score that can be used at first antenatal visit to identify women at high risk of GDM. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-4652cfc0be6a4a32909392f865023b55 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2314-6745 2314-6753 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Diabetes Research |
spelling | doaj-art-4652cfc0be6a4a32909392f865023b552025-02-03T01:02:30ZengWileyJournal of Diabetes Research2314-67452314-67532017-01-01201710.1155/2017/28493462849346Selective Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Observational StudySumaiya Adam0Paul Rheeder1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South AfricaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South AfricaAim. We aimed to develop a prediction model for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes and to evaluate the performance of published prediction tools on our population. Methods. We conducted a cohort study on nondiabetic women < 26 weeks gestation at a level 1 clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. At recruitment, participants completed a questionnaire and random basal glucose and HbA1c were evaluated. A 75 g 2-hour OGTT was scheduled between 24–28 weeks gestation, as per FIGO guidelines. A score was derived using multivariate logistic regression. Published scoring systems were tested by deriving ROC curves. Results. In 554 women, RBG, BMI, and previous baby ≥ 4000 g were significant risk factors included for GDM, which were used to derive a nomogram-based score. The logistic regression model for prediction of GDM had R2 0.143, Somer’s Dxy rank correlation 0.407, and Harrell’s c-score 0.703. HbA1c did not improve predictive value of the nomogram at any threshold (e.g,. at probability > 10%, 25.6% of cases were detected without the HbA1c, and 25.8% of cases would have been detected with the HbA1c). The 9 published scoring systems performed poorly. Conclusion. We propose a nomogram-based score that can be used at first antenatal visit to identify women at high risk of GDM.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2849346 |
spellingShingle | Sumaiya Adam Paul Rheeder Selective Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study Journal of Diabetes Research |
title | Selective Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study |
title_full | Selective Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Selective Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study |
title_short | Selective Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study |
title_sort | selective screening strategies for gestational diabetes a prospective cohort observational study |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2849346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sumaiyaadam selectivescreeningstrategiesforgestationaldiabetesaprospectivecohortobservationalstudy AT paulrheeder selectivescreeningstrategiesforgestationaldiabetesaprospectivecohortobservationalstudy |