How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2)

Change management in the field of training and certification of academic personnel implies a reliable information support in the form of statistical and sociological data that enable the monitoring of the effectiveness of the institution of doctoral education. The current system for monitoring the a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. I. Bednyi, A. A. Mironos, N. V. Rybakov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow Polytechnic University 2019-11-01
Series:Высшее образование в России
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1931
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832574510801354752
author B. I. Bednyi
A. A. Mironos
N. V. Rybakov
author_facet B. I. Bednyi
A. A. Mironos
N. V. Rybakov
author_sort B. I. Bednyi
collection DOAJ
description Change management in the field of training and certification of academic personnel implies a reliable information support in the form of statistical and sociological data that enable the monitoring of the effectiveness of the institution of doctoral education. The current system for monitoring the activities of doctoral schools does not fully meet these requirements, thus making it difficult to assess objectively the implementation of doctoral education’s main function – the training of researchers and faculty for higher education. The article attempts to fill this information lacuna by presenting an analysis of the database created by the authors which contains information about the defense of dissertations and research results of PhD students who graduated in 2013 from nine Russian universities over the five-year period after their graduation (N = 1178). Information on the results of each graduate’s research activities was obtained from open sources: the portal of the Higher Attestation Commission, the electronic catalog of the Russian State Library, Scopus and eLibrary.ru databases, as well as the database of the Industrial Property Institute. As a result of our research, it was established that the actual timeframe of doctoral students’ advancement to their academic degree is determined by discipline-related factors. In the sample as a whole, the share of persons who defended their dissertations was 45% of the total number of graduates, which is 1.7 times higher than the share of graduates who defended their dissertations in the course of their studies at the doctoral school. Approximately 90% of graduates defend their dissertations no later than two years after graduation from the doctoral school. The quantitative data of doctoral school graduates’ retention in the academic field are given, with the breakdown by discipline. On average, more than 60% of Candidate of Sciences degree holders continue their careers in academic positions. The obtained data on Russian doctoral school graduates are in good agreement with the results of monitoring doctoral programs’ graduates in Europe and the USA. The results of this work make it possible to take a fresh look at the methodology for diagnosing the effectiveness of university doctoral schools.
format Article
id doaj-art-45f09a5d6a2340b189bf5ff7f65411ec
institution Kabale University
issn 0869-3617
2072-0459
language English
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher Moscow Polytechnic University
record_format Article
series Высшее образование в России
spelling doaj-art-45f09a5d6a2340b189bf5ff7f65411ec2025-02-01T13:14:26ZengMoscow Polytechnic UniversityВысшее образование в России0869-36172072-04592019-11-01281092410.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-10-9-241491How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2)B. I. Bednyi0A. A. Mironos1N. V. Rybakov2National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny NovgoroNational Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny NovgoroNational Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny NovgoroChange management in the field of training and certification of academic personnel implies a reliable information support in the form of statistical and sociological data that enable the monitoring of the effectiveness of the institution of doctoral education. The current system for monitoring the activities of doctoral schools does not fully meet these requirements, thus making it difficult to assess objectively the implementation of doctoral education’s main function – the training of researchers and faculty for higher education. The article attempts to fill this information lacuna by presenting an analysis of the database created by the authors which contains information about the defense of dissertations and research results of PhD students who graduated in 2013 from nine Russian universities over the five-year period after their graduation (N = 1178). Information on the results of each graduate’s research activities was obtained from open sources: the portal of the Higher Attestation Commission, the electronic catalog of the Russian State Library, Scopus and eLibrary.ru databases, as well as the database of the Industrial Property Institute. As a result of our research, it was established that the actual timeframe of doctoral students’ advancement to their academic degree is determined by discipline-related factors. In the sample as a whole, the share of persons who defended their dissertations was 45% of the total number of graduates, which is 1.7 times higher than the share of graduates who defended their dissertations in the course of their studies at the doctoral school. Approximately 90% of graduates defend their dissertations no later than two years after graduation from the doctoral school. The quantitative data of doctoral school graduates’ retention in the academic field are given, with the breakdown by discipline. On average, more than 60% of Candidate of Sciences degree holders continue their careers in academic positions. The obtained data on Russian doctoral school graduates are in good agreement with the results of monitoring doctoral programs’ graduates in Europe and the USA. The results of this work make it possible to take a fresh look at the methodology for diagnosing the effectiveness of university doctoral schools.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1931academic and research personneleffectiveness of doctoral educationdoctoral program graduatestimeframe of dissertation preparationresearch productivityretention of young people in science
spellingShingle B. I. Bednyi
A. A. Mironos
N. V. Rybakov
How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2)
Высшее образование в России
academic and research personnel
effectiveness of doctoral education
doctoral program graduates
timeframe of dissertation preparation
research productivity
retention of young people in science
title How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2)
title_full How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2)
title_fullStr How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2)
title_full_unstemmed How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2)
title_short How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2)
title_sort how russian doctoral education fulfills its main mission scientometric assessments article 2
topic academic and research personnel
effectiveness of doctoral education
doctoral program graduates
timeframe of dissertation preparation
research productivity
retention of young people in science
url https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1931
work_keys_str_mv AT bibednyi howrussiandoctoraleducationfulfillsitsmainmissionscientometricassessmentsarticle2
AT aamironos howrussiandoctoraleducationfulfillsitsmainmissionscientometricassessmentsarticle2
AT nvrybakov howrussiandoctoraleducationfulfillsitsmainmissionscientometricassessmentsarticle2