Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles

Vehicle collisions with birds are financially costly and dangerous to humans and animals. To reduce collisions, it is necessary to understand how birds respond to approaching vehicles. We used simulated (i.e., animals exposed to video playback) and real vehicle approaches with mallards (Anas platyry...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shane Guenin, Carson J. Pakula, Jonathon Skaggs, Esteban Fernández-Juricic, Travis L. DeVault
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2024-09-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/18124.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850258169714966528
author Shane Guenin
Carson J. Pakula
Jonathon Skaggs
Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Travis L. DeVault
author_facet Shane Guenin
Carson J. Pakula
Jonathon Skaggs
Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Travis L. DeVault
author_sort Shane Guenin
collection DOAJ
description Vehicle collisions with birds are financially costly and dangerous to humans and animals. To reduce collisions, it is necessary to understand how birds respond to approaching vehicles. We used simulated (i.e., animals exposed to video playback) and real vehicle approaches with mallards (Anas platyrynchos) to quantify flight behavior and probability of collision under different vehicle speeds and times of day (day vs. night). Birds exposed to simulated nighttime approaches exhibited reduced probability of attempting escape, but when escape was attempted, fled with more time before collision compared to birds exposed to simulated daytime approaches. The lower probability of flight may indicate that the visual stimulus of vehicle approaches at night (i.e., looming headlights) is perceived as less threatening than when the full vehicle is more visible during the day; alternatively, the mallard visual system might be incompatible with vehicle lighting in dark settings. Mallards approached by a real vehicle exhibited a delayed margin of safety (both flight initiation distance and time before collision decreased with speed); they are the first bird species found to exhibit this response to vehicle approach. Our findings suggest mallards are poorly equipped to adequately respond to fast-moving vehicles and demonstrate the need for continued research into methods promoting effective avian avoidance behaviors.
format Article
id doaj-art-45cea993cd1843448dfd64e8a5bc38c9
institution OA Journals
issn 2167-8359
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj-art-45cea993cd1843448dfd64e8a5bc38c92025-08-20T01:56:14ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592024-09-0112e1812410.7717/peerj.18124Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehiclesShane Guenin0Carson J. Pakula1Jonathon Skaggs2Esteban Fernández-Juricic3Travis L. DeVault4Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, South Carolina, United StatesSavannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, South Carolina, United StatesSavannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, South Carolina, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United StatesSavannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, South Carolina, United StatesVehicle collisions with birds are financially costly and dangerous to humans and animals. To reduce collisions, it is necessary to understand how birds respond to approaching vehicles. We used simulated (i.e., animals exposed to video playback) and real vehicle approaches with mallards (Anas platyrynchos) to quantify flight behavior and probability of collision under different vehicle speeds and times of day (day vs. night). Birds exposed to simulated nighttime approaches exhibited reduced probability of attempting escape, but when escape was attempted, fled with more time before collision compared to birds exposed to simulated daytime approaches. The lower probability of flight may indicate that the visual stimulus of vehicle approaches at night (i.e., looming headlights) is perceived as less threatening than when the full vehicle is more visible during the day; alternatively, the mallard visual system might be incompatible with vehicle lighting in dark settings. Mallards approached by a real vehicle exhibited a delayed margin of safety (both flight initiation distance and time before collision decreased with speed); they are the first bird species found to exhibit this response to vehicle approach. Our findings suggest mallards are poorly equipped to adequately respond to fast-moving vehicles and demonstrate the need for continued research into methods promoting effective avian avoidance behaviors.https://peerj.com/articles/18124.pdfMallardWildlife-vehicle interactionFlight initiation distanceAntipredator behaviorAvoidance behaviorVideo playback
spellingShingle Shane Guenin
Carson J. Pakula
Jonathon Skaggs
Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Travis L. DeVault
Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles
PeerJ
Mallard
Wildlife-vehicle interaction
Flight initiation distance
Antipredator behavior
Avoidance behavior
Video playback
title Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles
title_full Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles
title_fullStr Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles
title_full_unstemmed Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles
title_short Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles
title_sort inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles
topic Mallard
Wildlife-vehicle interaction
Flight initiation distance
Antipredator behavior
Avoidance behavior
Video playback
url https://peerj.com/articles/18124.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shaneguenin inefficacyofmallardflightresponsestoapproachingvehicles
AT carsonjpakula inefficacyofmallardflightresponsestoapproachingvehicles
AT jonathonskaggs inefficacyofmallardflightresponsestoapproachingvehicles
AT estebanfernandezjuricic inefficacyofmallardflightresponsestoapproachingvehicles
AT travisldevault inefficacyofmallardflightresponsestoapproachingvehicles