Application of synbiotic with different probiotic doses to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper

ABSTRACT   The aim of this study was to evaluate the supplementation of synbiotic with different doses of probiotics to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper (Cromileptes altivelis). Grouper (3.0±0.48 g) fed by control feeds (without supplementation of synbiotic) which were K(-) and K(+), treatment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dwi Agung Saputra, , Sukenda, , Widanarni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asosiasi Sains Akuakultur Indonesia 2015-05-01
Series:Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia
Online Access:https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jai/article/view/9372
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587066359152640
author Dwi Agung Saputra
, Sukenda
, Widanarni
author_facet Dwi Agung Saputra
, Sukenda
, Widanarni
author_sort Dwi Agung Saputra
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT   The aim of this study was to evaluate the supplementation of synbiotic with different doses of probiotics to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper (Cromileptes altivelis). Grouper (3.0±0.48 g) fed by control feeds (without supplementation of synbiotic) which were K(-) and K(+), treatment feeds with supplementation of synbiotic with different doses of probiotic (probiotic 104 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotic 2% (P1) v/w, (probiotic 106 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotic 2% (P2) v/w, (probiotic 108 cfu/mL)1% + prebiotic 2% (P3) v/w) for 30 days. After a feeding trial period, there were observation of the bacterial counts in the fish intestine, the fish growth performance and immune response. Then all the grouper were challenged by Vibrio alginolyticus, except K (-). This study showed that survival, daily growth and food conversion ratio (FCR) of grouper in treatment P2 ((probiotic 106 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotic 2%) and P3 (probiotic (108 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotic 2%) were significantly better (P>0.05) than controls. The different doses of probiotic in synbiotic (probiotic 104 cfu/mL, probiotic 106 cfu/mL and probiotic 108 cfu/mL) provided better immune response than controls.   Keywords: synbiotic, Vibrio alginolyticus, Bacillus sp., Cromileptes altivelis     ABSTRAK   Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengkaji pemberian sinbiotik dengan dosis probiotik berbeda untuk mencegah penyakit vibriosis pada ikan kerapu bebek (Cromileptes altivelis). Ikan kerapu dengan berat (3,0±0,48 g) diberikan pakan kontrol (tanpa penambahan sinbiotik) K(-) dan K(+), pakan perlakuan dengan penambahan sinbiotik dengan dosis probiotik berbeda: probiotik ((104 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotik 2%) v/w (P1), ((probiotik 106 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotik 2%) v/w (P2), dan ((probiotik 108 cfu/mL)1% + prebiotik 2%) v/w (P3) selama 30 hari. Setelah perlakuan pakan sinbiotik, dilakukan pengamatan terhadap jumlah total bakteri di usus, kinerja pertumbuhan dan respons imun. Kemudian ikan kerapu pada seluruh perlakuan, kecuali kontrol negatif (-) diberi uji tantang dengan Vibrio alginolyticus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sintasan, laju pertumbuhan harian (LPH), dan rasio konversi pakan (FCR) pada perlakuan P2 ((probiotik 106 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotik 2%) dan  P3 (probiotik (108 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotik 2%) secara signifikan lebih baik (P<0,05) bila dibandingkan dengan kontrol. Perlakuan sinbiotik dengan dosis probiotik berbeda (probiotik 104 cfu/mL, probiotik 106 cfu/mL, dan probiotik 108 cfu/mL) juga memberikan respons imun yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan kontrol.   Kata kunci : sinbiotik, Vibrio alginolyticus, Bacillus sp., Cromileptes altivelis
format Article
id doaj-art-4505c3ac3090412eaa6528708c34424e
institution Kabale University
issn 1412-5269
2354-6700
language English
publishDate 2015-05-01
publisher Asosiasi Sains Akuakultur Indonesia
record_format Article
series Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia
spelling doaj-art-4505c3ac3090412eaa6528708c34424e2025-01-24T17:59:14ZengAsosiasi Sains Akuakultur IndonesiaJurnal Akuakultur Indonesia1412-52692354-67002015-05-0112210.19027/jai.12.169-1777836Application of synbiotic with different probiotic doses to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouperDwi Agung Saputra0, Sukenda1, Widanarni2Sekolah Pascasarjana, Program Studi Ilmu Akuakultur, Institut Pertanian Bogor Kampus IPB Dramaga Bogor 16680Departemen Budidaya Perairan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Kampus IPB Dramaga Bogor 16680Departemen Budidaya Perairan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Kampus IPB Dramaga Bogor 16680ABSTRACT   The aim of this study was to evaluate the supplementation of synbiotic with different doses of probiotics to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper (Cromileptes altivelis). Grouper (3.0±0.48 g) fed by control feeds (without supplementation of synbiotic) which were K(-) and K(+), treatment feeds with supplementation of synbiotic with different doses of probiotic (probiotic 104 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotic 2% (P1) v/w, (probiotic 106 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotic 2% (P2) v/w, (probiotic 108 cfu/mL)1% + prebiotic 2% (P3) v/w) for 30 days. After a feeding trial period, there were observation of the bacterial counts in the fish intestine, the fish growth performance and immune response. Then all the grouper were challenged by Vibrio alginolyticus, except K (-). This study showed that survival, daily growth and food conversion ratio (FCR) of grouper in treatment P2 ((probiotic 106 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotic 2%) and P3 (probiotic (108 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotic 2%) were significantly better (P>0.05) than controls. The different doses of probiotic in synbiotic (probiotic 104 cfu/mL, probiotic 106 cfu/mL and probiotic 108 cfu/mL) provided better immune response than controls.   Keywords: synbiotic, Vibrio alginolyticus, Bacillus sp., Cromileptes altivelis     ABSTRAK   Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengkaji pemberian sinbiotik dengan dosis probiotik berbeda untuk mencegah penyakit vibriosis pada ikan kerapu bebek (Cromileptes altivelis). Ikan kerapu dengan berat (3,0±0,48 g) diberikan pakan kontrol (tanpa penambahan sinbiotik) K(-) dan K(+), pakan perlakuan dengan penambahan sinbiotik dengan dosis probiotik berbeda: probiotik ((104 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotik 2%) v/w (P1), ((probiotik 106 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotik 2%) v/w (P2), dan ((probiotik 108 cfu/mL)1% + prebiotik 2%) v/w (P3) selama 30 hari. Setelah perlakuan pakan sinbiotik, dilakukan pengamatan terhadap jumlah total bakteri di usus, kinerja pertumbuhan dan respons imun. Kemudian ikan kerapu pada seluruh perlakuan, kecuali kontrol negatif (-) diberi uji tantang dengan Vibrio alginolyticus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sintasan, laju pertumbuhan harian (LPH), dan rasio konversi pakan (FCR) pada perlakuan P2 ((probiotik 106 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotik 2%) dan  P3 (probiotik (108 cfu/mL) 1% + prebiotik 2%) secara signifikan lebih baik (P<0,05) bila dibandingkan dengan kontrol. Perlakuan sinbiotik dengan dosis probiotik berbeda (probiotik 104 cfu/mL, probiotik 106 cfu/mL, dan probiotik 108 cfu/mL) juga memberikan respons imun yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan kontrol.   Kata kunci : sinbiotik, Vibrio alginolyticus, Bacillus sp., Cromileptes altivelis https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jai/article/view/9372
spellingShingle Dwi Agung Saputra
, Sukenda
, Widanarni
Application of synbiotic with different probiotic doses to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper
Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia
title Application of synbiotic with different probiotic doses to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper
title_full Application of synbiotic with different probiotic doses to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper
title_fullStr Application of synbiotic with different probiotic doses to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper
title_full_unstemmed Application of synbiotic with different probiotic doses to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper
title_short Application of synbiotic with different probiotic doses to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper
title_sort application of synbiotic with different probiotic doses to prevent vibriosis in humpback grouper
url https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jai/article/view/9372
work_keys_str_mv AT dwiagungsaputra applicationofsynbioticwithdifferentprobioticdosestopreventvibriosisinhumpbackgrouper
AT sukenda applicationofsynbioticwithdifferentprobioticdosestopreventvibriosisinhumpbackgrouper
AT widanarni applicationofsynbioticwithdifferentprobioticdosestopreventvibriosisinhumpbackgrouper