A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors
Abstract Background The purpose of this scoping review is to describe how the literature has discussed and studied disability in undergraduate-level STEM courses in the United States. A Critical Disability Studies lens informed our inclusion criteria. Results We considered extensive lists of disabil...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of STEM Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00522-2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832594400722550784 |
|---|---|
| author | Maura Borrego Ariel Chasen Hannah Chapman Tripp Emily Landgren Elisa Koolman |
| author_facet | Maura Borrego Ariel Chasen Hannah Chapman Tripp Emily Landgren Elisa Koolman |
| author_sort | Maura Borrego |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The purpose of this scoping review is to describe how the literature has discussed and studied disability in undergraduate-level STEM courses in the United States. A Critical Disability Studies lens informed our inclusion criteria. Results We considered extensive lists of disability types and diagnoses and concluded that “disability” as a search term best captured educational experiences rather than medical approaches. After screening nearly 9000 abstracts, we identified a final set of 409 dissertations, articles, conference papers, commentaries, briefs and news items. Sources appeared in discipline-based education research (DBER), STEM disciplinary and education journals as well as DBER conferences. Under 10% of sources included 2-year college settings. The largest groups of sources focused on disability writ large (39%, vs. specific categories) and across STEM (38%, vs. specific disciplines). Students were the main research participants (80%). Instructors were the main target of recommendations (84%). In terms of solutions, the largest group (n = 111) advocated for Universal Design, followed by accommodations (n = 94), and technology developed or tested with persons with disabilities (n = 90). Sources which the authors framed as empirical studies less frequently disclosed positionality as a person with a disability (16%) than non-empirical sources (21%). Quantitative (n = 125), qualitative (n = 99), and mixed methods (n = 64) approaches were well-represented. The most common data collection methods were surveys, assessments or task completions (n = 161 sources), followed by interviews (n = 109), observations (n = 44), document analyses (n = 18), and institutional student records (n = 14). Conclusions More research is needed that centers the experiences of students with disabilities, focuses on specific disability types, employs critical quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and otherwise avoids implicit deficit views of disabled students. Citations to the qualifying sources are available in a public Zotero library. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4496c4fa80994da9865fb3a9b6708c8c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2196-7822 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of STEM Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-4496c4fa80994da9865fb3a9b6708c8c2025-01-19T12:37:54ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of STEM Education2196-78222025-01-0112112010.1186/s40594-024-00522-2A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majorsMaura Borrego0Ariel Chasen1Hannah Chapman Tripp2Emily Landgren3Elisa Koolman4Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at AustinSTEM Education Program, University of Texas at AustinUniversity Libraries, University of Texas at AustinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at AustinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at AustinAbstract Background The purpose of this scoping review is to describe how the literature has discussed and studied disability in undergraduate-level STEM courses in the United States. A Critical Disability Studies lens informed our inclusion criteria. Results We considered extensive lists of disability types and diagnoses and concluded that “disability” as a search term best captured educational experiences rather than medical approaches. After screening nearly 9000 abstracts, we identified a final set of 409 dissertations, articles, conference papers, commentaries, briefs and news items. Sources appeared in discipline-based education research (DBER), STEM disciplinary and education journals as well as DBER conferences. Under 10% of sources included 2-year college settings. The largest groups of sources focused on disability writ large (39%, vs. specific categories) and across STEM (38%, vs. specific disciplines). Students were the main research participants (80%). Instructors were the main target of recommendations (84%). In terms of solutions, the largest group (n = 111) advocated for Universal Design, followed by accommodations (n = 94), and technology developed or tested with persons with disabilities (n = 90). Sources which the authors framed as empirical studies less frequently disclosed positionality as a person with a disability (16%) than non-empirical sources (21%). Quantitative (n = 125), qualitative (n = 99), and mixed methods (n = 64) approaches were well-represented. The most common data collection methods were surveys, assessments or task completions (n = 161 sources), followed by interviews (n = 109), observations (n = 44), document analyses (n = 18), and institutional student records (n = 14). Conclusions More research is needed that centers the experiences of students with disabilities, focuses on specific disability types, employs critical quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and otherwise avoids implicit deficit views of disabled students. Citations to the qualifying sources are available in a public Zotero library.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00522-2BiologyChemistryComputingDisabilityEngineeringGeosciences |
| spellingShingle | Maura Borrego Ariel Chasen Hannah Chapman Tripp Emily Landgren Elisa Koolman A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors International Journal of STEM Education Biology Chemistry Computing Disability Engineering Geosciences |
| title | A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors |
| title_full | A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors |
| title_fullStr | A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors |
| title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors |
| title_short | A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors |
| title_sort | scoping review on u s undergraduate students with disabilities in stem courses and stem majors |
| topic | Biology Chemistry Computing Disability Engineering Geosciences |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00522-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mauraborrego ascopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors AT arielchasen ascopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors AT hannahchapmantripp ascopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors AT emilylandgren ascopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors AT elisakoolman ascopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors AT mauraborrego scopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors AT arielchasen scopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors AT hannahchapmantripp scopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors AT emilylandgren scopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors AT elisakoolman scopingreviewonusundergraduatestudentswithdisabilitiesinstemcoursesandstemmajors |