Comparing Fetal Weight Estimates in the Third Trimester: Clinical Examination Findings, Ultrasonographic Estimation, and Actual Birth Weight

Objective: To determine the relationship between fetal weight on clinical and ultrasonographic examinations and actual birth weight during the third trimester of pregnancy. Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Obs/Gynae from January 2023 to June 2023. A total of 1130 wo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayesha Ghaffar, Sabeen Ashraf, Hafiza Alia Akbar Khan, Saba Yousaf, Tallat Farkhanda, Amartur Rabbal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rawalpindi Medical University 2024-06-01
Series:Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Online Access:https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/2510
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832086915223912448
author Ayesha Ghaffar
Sabeen Ashraf
Hafiza Alia Akbar Khan
Saba Yousaf
Tallat Farkhanda
Amartur Rabbal
author_facet Ayesha Ghaffar
Sabeen Ashraf
Hafiza Alia Akbar Khan
Saba Yousaf
Tallat Farkhanda
Amartur Rabbal
author_sort Ayesha Ghaffar
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To determine the relationship between fetal weight on clinical and ultrasonographic examinations and actual birth weight during the third trimester of pregnancy. Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Obs/Gynae from January 2023 to June 2023. A total of 1130 women between the ages of 18 and 40, gestational age of > 34 weeks, BMI of 18 to 25 kg/m2, single cephalic fetus and who gave consent were included. The patients with PIH, preeclampsia, eclampsia, anaemia, chronic renal disease, diabetes and conditions such as polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, and congenital fetal anomalies were excluded from the study. The demographic information was recorded. By using Johnson's formula, patients go through CEFW. The skilled radiologists performed an ultrasound on every female to obtain UEFW. The Shepard formula was used to calculate the FW. Following that, females were monitored till the birth of the fetus. The baby's actual birth weight (ABW) was recorded at birth. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship's correlation value between the ABW, CEFW, and UEFW. P values lower than 0.05 were regarded as significant. Results: The patients' average age was 25.19±4.26 years. According to the gender breakdown of infants, 619 females (54.8%) and 511 males (45.2%) were born. 207 patients (18.3%) were primigravida and 923 patients (81.7%) were multiparous. The connection between CEFW and ABW was high (r=0.890; p 0.001), and UEFW and ABW were correlated with one other likewise (r=0.934; p 0.001). The following were the mean values of the various variables: Gestational age (weeks): 37.51±2.06; height (cm): 163.97±3.39; weight (kg): 76.43±6.65; BMI (kg/m^2): 28.60±2.80; SFH: 36.63±1.46; CEFW (gms) 3061.50±367.66, UEFW (gms) 3014.42±339.71 and ABW (gms) 3059.12±310.32. Conclusion: According to the findings of our investigation, both clinical estimation and ultrasound estimation produced results that were both practicable and trustworthy. Both displayed a favourable link to the real birth weight.
format Article
id doaj-art-44352393c7e3439eba9c73f470a68107
institution Kabale University
issn 1683-3562
1683-3570
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Rawalpindi Medical University
record_format Article
series Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
spelling doaj-art-44352393c7e3439eba9c73f470a681072025-02-06T08:36:00ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702024-06-0128210.37939/jrmc.v28i2.2510Comparing Fetal Weight Estimates in the Third Trimester: Clinical Examination Findings, Ultrasonographic Estimation, and Actual Birth WeightAyesha GhaffarSabeen Ashraf0Hafiza Alia Akbar KhanSaba YousafTallat FarkhandaAmartur RabbalHoly Family Hospital Objective: To determine the relationship between fetal weight on clinical and ultrasonographic examinations and actual birth weight during the third trimester of pregnancy. Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Obs/Gynae from January 2023 to June 2023. A total of 1130 women between the ages of 18 and 40, gestational age of > 34 weeks, BMI of 18 to 25 kg/m2, single cephalic fetus and who gave consent were included. The patients with PIH, preeclampsia, eclampsia, anaemia, chronic renal disease, diabetes and conditions such as polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, and congenital fetal anomalies were excluded from the study. The demographic information was recorded. By using Johnson's formula, patients go through CEFW. The skilled radiologists performed an ultrasound on every female to obtain UEFW. The Shepard formula was used to calculate the FW. Following that, females were monitored till the birth of the fetus. The baby's actual birth weight (ABW) was recorded at birth. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship's correlation value between the ABW, CEFW, and UEFW. P values lower than 0.05 were regarded as significant. Results: The patients' average age was 25.19±4.26 years. According to the gender breakdown of infants, 619 females (54.8%) and 511 males (45.2%) were born. 207 patients (18.3%) were primigravida and 923 patients (81.7%) were multiparous. The connection between CEFW and ABW was high (r=0.890; p 0.001), and UEFW and ABW were correlated with one other likewise (r=0.934; p 0.001). The following were the mean values of the various variables: Gestational age (weeks): 37.51±2.06; height (cm): 163.97±3.39; weight (kg): 76.43±6.65; BMI (kg/m^2): 28.60±2.80; SFH: 36.63±1.46; CEFW (gms) 3061.50±367.66, UEFW (gms) 3014.42±339.71 and ABW (gms) 3059.12±310.32. Conclusion: According to the findings of our investigation, both clinical estimation and ultrasound estimation produced results that were both practicable and trustworthy. Both displayed a favourable link to the real birth weight. https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/2510
spellingShingle Ayesha Ghaffar
Sabeen Ashraf
Hafiza Alia Akbar Khan
Saba Yousaf
Tallat Farkhanda
Amartur Rabbal
Comparing Fetal Weight Estimates in the Third Trimester: Clinical Examination Findings, Ultrasonographic Estimation, and Actual Birth Weight
Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
title Comparing Fetal Weight Estimates in the Third Trimester: Clinical Examination Findings, Ultrasonographic Estimation, and Actual Birth Weight
title_full Comparing Fetal Weight Estimates in the Third Trimester: Clinical Examination Findings, Ultrasonographic Estimation, and Actual Birth Weight
title_fullStr Comparing Fetal Weight Estimates in the Third Trimester: Clinical Examination Findings, Ultrasonographic Estimation, and Actual Birth Weight
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Fetal Weight Estimates in the Third Trimester: Clinical Examination Findings, Ultrasonographic Estimation, and Actual Birth Weight
title_short Comparing Fetal Weight Estimates in the Third Trimester: Clinical Examination Findings, Ultrasonographic Estimation, and Actual Birth Weight
title_sort comparing fetal weight estimates in the third trimester clinical examination findings ultrasonographic estimation and actual birth weight
url https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/2510
work_keys_str_mv AT ayeshaghaffar comparingfetalweightestimatesinthethirdtrimesterclinicalexaminationfindingsultrasonographicestimationandactualbirthweight
AT sabeenashraf comparingfetalweightestimatesinthethirdtrimesterclinicalexaminationfindingsultrasonographicestimationandactualbirthweight
AT hafizaaliaakbarkhan comparingfetalweightestimatesinthethirdtrimesterclinicalexaminationfindingsultrasonographicestimationandactualbirthweight
AT sabayousaf comparingfetalweightestimatesinthethirdtrimesterclinicalexaminationfindingsultrasonographicestimationandactualbirthweight
AT tallatfarkhanda comparingfetalweightestimatesinthethirdtrimesterclinicalexaminationfindingsultrasonographicestimationandactualbirthweight
AT amarturrabbal comparingfetalweightestimatesinthethirdtrimesterclinicalexaminationfindingsultrasonographicestimationandactualbirthweight