Frontières de l’humain et technologies de genre monstrueux

This article uses queer theory (Butler, Preciado, Halberstam) to analyse Dennis Cooper's The Marble Swarm, and shows how that the novel reveals the mechanisms of edification of sexual norms. In fact, Cooper's novel questions the link between gender and monster: the monster, just as gender,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kevin Lambert
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Genres, sexualités, langage 2019-12-01
Series:Glad!
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/glad/1691
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832580955998519296
author Kevin Lambert
author_facet Kevin Lambert
author_sort Kevin Lambert
collection DOAJ
description This article uses queer theory (Butler, Preciado, Halberstam) to analyse Dennis Cooper's The Marble Swarm, and shows how that the novel reveals the mechanisms of edification of sexual norms. In fact, Cooper's novel questions the link between gender and monster: the monster, just as gender, is exhibited as a cultural and discursive production, through the exploration of the sexual and cultural devices that produce it. The monster who narrates the novel is built at the intersection of socially prohibited economic, racial and criminal behaviors and sexual desires, which compose his fictional abjection. The novel therefore testifies to some important changes in the contemporary imagination surrounding the monster. According to Halberstam in Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters, contemporary fictional incarnations of monsters herald a change in the representation of the figure. When the Victorian monster embodied everything that threatened the dominant culture in order to protect it, the contemporary monster is characterized by its proximity to the human and to the norm. Thus, the narrator/monster of The Marble Swarm functions as a narrative instrument that criticises dominant culture rather than strengthening it. The monster and its actions are made possible thanks to the over-permissive, marginal space the wealthy narrator was born into. The Marble Swarm rather than offering a stable model of the monstrous coins a generative conception of it similar to the Butlerian concept of gender. Cooper’s monster is the result of a manufacturing process that establishes it as such in both the diegesis and the text. Through the same strategy, the novel threatens the once stable limits of the monstrous: one is not born but rather becomes a monster, and no one is safe from this becoming-monster that haunts The Marble Swarm. Not even the reader.
format Article
id doaj-art-43e5fad2526a48e7ad5801fb0a9a4adb
institution Kabale University
issn 2551-0819
language fra
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Association Genres, sexualités, langage
record_format Article
series Glad!
spelling doaj-art-43e5fad2526a48e7ad5801fb0a9a4adb2025-01-30T10:37:34ZfraAssociation Genres, sexualités, langageGlad!2551-08192019-12-01710.4000/glad.1691Frontières de l’humain et technologies de genre monstrueuxKevin LambertThis article uses queer theory (Butler, Preciado, Halberstam) to analyse Dennis Cooper's The Marble Swarm, and shows how that the novel reveals the mechanisms of edification of sexual norms. In fact, Cooper's novel questions the link between gender and monster: the monster, just as gender, is exhibited as a cultural and discursive production, through the exploration of the sexual and cultural devices that produce it. The monster who narrates the novel is built at the intersection of socially prohibited economic, racial and criminal behaviors and sexual desires, which compose his fictional abjection. The novel therefore testifies to some important changes in the contemporary imagination surrounding the monster. According to Halberstam in Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters, contemporary fictional incarnations of monsters herald a change in the representation of the figure. When the Victorian monster embodied everything that threatened the dominant culture in order to protect it, the contemporary monster is characterized by its proximity to the human and to the norm. Thus, the narrator/monster of The Marble Swarm functions as a narrative instrument that criticises dominant culture rather than strengthening it. The monster and its actions are made possible thanks to the over-permissive, marginal space the wealthy narrator was born into. The Marble Swarm rather than offering a stable model of the monstrous coins a generative conception of it similar to the Butlerian concept of gender. Cooper’s monster is the result of a manufacturing process that establishes it as such in both the diegesis and the text. Through the same strategy, the novel threatens the once stable limits of the monstrous: one is not born but rather becomes a monster, and no one is safe from this becoming-monster that haunts The Marble Swarm. Not even the reader.https://journals.openedition.org/glad/1691homosexualityqueer studiesmonstergender and sexualitycontemporary literatureAmerican literature
spellingShingle Kevin Lambert
Frontières de l’humain et technologies de genre monstrueux
Glad!
homosexuality
queer studies
monster
gender and sexuality
contemporary literature
American literature
title Frontières de l’humain et technologies de genre monstrueux
title_full Frontières de l’humain et technologies de genre monstrueux
title_fullStr Frontières de l’humain et technologies de genre monstrueux
title_full_unstemmed Frontières de l’humain et technologies de genre monstrueux
title_short Frontières de l’humain et technologies de genre monstrueux
title_sort frontieres de l humain et technologies de genre monstrueux
topic homosexuality
queer studies
monster
gender and sexuality
contemporary literature
American literature
url https://journals.openedition.org/glad/1691
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinlambert frontieresdelhumainettechnologiesdegenremonstrueux