Usage of the dwarf mongoose optimization-based ANFIS on the static strength of seasonally frozen soils

Abstract Seasonally frozen soils are exposed to annual freeze-melt periods, which weakens their mechanical qualities. To precisely characterize the diminishment of soil under various situations, a forecasting system for soil static strength (S s) has been developed using ML technology. In this study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowen Liu, Junbin Chen, Xiaoguang Zhang, Zhenwei Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00638-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Seasonally frozen soils are exposed to annual freeze-melt periods, which weakens their mechanical qualities. To precisely characterize the diminishment of soil under various situations, a forecasting system for soil static strength (S s) has been developed using ML technology. In this study, two machine learning (ML) tactics were designed and validated to evaluate the S s of seasonally frozen soils, namely the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and support vector regression (SVR). To find hyper-parameters of models as ideally as possible, the dwarf mongoose optimization algorithm (DMOA) was employed (ANF DW, and SVR DW). Input parameters introduced to the frameworks were water content, below freezing, confining pressure, freeze-melt periods, melting time, and compression degree. The coefficient of determination (R 2) quantities for the ANFDW network were discovered to be, respectively, 0.9915 and 0.9965 throughout the training and testing stages. For example, the $${R}^{2}$$ R 2 for the $$ANN$$ ANN and $$PCA-ANN$$ P C A - A N N (literature) is 0.97, which is smaller than 0.9915 for the $${ANF}_{DW}$$ ANF DW during the training step. Similarly, in the testing levels, the $${R}^{2}$$ R 2 value is 0.96 compared to 0.9965. Regarding root relative square error (RRSE), ANF DW could receive 0.0925 and 0.0629 lower than 0.1267 and 0.1186 related to the SVR DW in the training and testing sections, respectively. Upon comparing the effectiveness of diverse systems in the literature, although their effectiveness was adequate, the model built in this investigation illustrated superior performance.
ISSN:1110-1903
2536-9512