Forced feeding of convicts: problems of theory and practice

The problematic issues of legislative consolidation and application of forced feeding to convicts who refuse to take food in institutions of execution of punishment are considered. An analysis of domestic and international legislation in the field of treatment of convicts, prohibition of torture...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu. V. Orel, R. R. Galán Vioque
Format: Article
Language:Ukrainian
Published: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs 2023-07-01
Series:Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs
Subjects:
Online Access:http://visnyk.univd.edu.ua/index.php/VNUAF/article/view/544
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832557424941203456
author Yu. V. Orel
R. R. Galán Vioque
author_facet Yu. V. Orel
R. R. Galán Vioque
author_sort Yu. V. Orel
collection DOAJ
description The problematic issues of legislative consolidation and application of forced feeding to convicts who refuse to take food in institutions of execution of punishment are considered. An analysis of domestic and international legislation in the field of treatment of convicts, prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and punishment, principles of medical ethics and deontology regarding the admissibility of forced feeding of persons who have declared a hunger strike was carried out. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights against Ukraine, which found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the context of the treatment of convicts during their forced feeding, which was classified as torture. Emphasis has been placed on the fact that the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in itself does not prohibit forced feeding, the purpose of which is to save the life of a specific person who is in custody and who deliberately refuses to eat. At the same time, it has been emphasized the need to comply with the requirements established by the European Court of Human Rights regarding the implementation of this procedure. It has been proposed to abandon and prohibit the forced feeding of a mentally healthy and capable person who has declared a hunger strike, contrary to his informed and voluntary refusal, in the form in which it currently exists, replacing it with artificial feeding (supportive therapy) with the express or necessarily implied consent of the person.
format Article
id doaj-art-43bd8a8a2620417fab2adff7082f86c6
institution Kabale University
issn 1999-5717
2617-278X
language Ukrainian
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs
record_format Article
series Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs
spelling doaj-art-43bd8a8a2620417fab2adff7082f86c62025-02-03T04:55:25ZukrKharkiv National University of Internal AffairsBulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs1999-57172617-278X2023-07-011012 (P. 1)16317410.32631/v.2023.2.15544Forced feeding of convicts: problems of theory and practiceYu. V. Orel0R. R. Galán Vioque1University of Seville (Seville, Spain)University of Seville (Seville, Spain)The problematic issues of legislative consolidation and application of forced feeding to convicts who refuse to take food in institutions of execution of punishment are considered. An analysis of domestic and international legislation in the field of treatment of convicts, prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and punishment, principles of medical ethics and deontology regarding the admissibility of forced feeding of persons who have declared a hunger strike was carried out. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights against Ukraine, which found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the context of the treatment of convicts during their forced feeding, which was classified as torture. Emphasis has been placed on the fact that the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in itself does not prohibit forced feeding, the purpose of which is to save the life of a specific person who is in custody and who deliberately refuses to eat. At the same time, it has been emphasized the need to comply with the requirements established by the European Court of Human Rights regarding the implementation of this procedure. It has been proposed to abandon and prohibit the forced feeding of a mentally healthy and capable person who has declared a hunger strike, contrary to his informed and voluntary refusal, in the form in which it currently exists, replacing it with artificial feeding (supportive therapy) with the express or necessarily implied consent of the person.http://visnyk.univd.edu.ua/index.php/VNUAF/article/view/544starvationforced feedingconvictcruel treatmentprohibition of tortureeuropean court of human rights.
spellingShingle Yu. V. Orel
R. R. Galán Vioque
Forced feeding of convicts: problems of theory and practice
Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs
starvation
forced feeding
convict
cruel treatment
prohibition of torture
european court of human rights.
title Forced feeding of convicts: problems of theory and practice
title_full Forced feeding of convicts: problems of theory and practice
title_fullStr Forced feeding of convicts: problems of theory and practice
title_full_unstemmed Forced feeding of convicts: problems of theory and practice
title_short Forced feeding of convicts: problems of theory and practice
title_sort forced feeding of convicts problems of theory and practice
topic starvation
forced feeding
convict
cruel treatment
prohibition of torture
european court of human rights.
url http://visnyk.univd.edu.ua/index.php/VNUAF/article/view/544
work_keys_str_mv AT yuvorel forcedfeedingofconvictsproblemsoftheoryandpractice
AT rrgalanvioque forcedfeedingofconvictsproblemsoftheoryandpractice