Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri-implant mucositis – An in vivo study

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the antimicrobial effects of an 810-nanometer diode laser, utilizing or not utilizing toluidine blue as a photosensitizer, in the management of peri-implant mucositis. Settings and Design: The present study was carried out in 30 implant sites...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Poonam Siwach, Reshu Sanan, Abhishek Nagpal, Omkar Krishna Shetty, Amit Bhardwaj, Mukesh Sharma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jips.jips_64_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087215580119040
author Poonam Siwach
Reshu Sanan
Abhishek Nagpal
Omkar Krishna Shetty
Amit Bhardwaj
Mukesh Sharma
author_facet Poonam Siwach
Reshu Sanan
Abhishek Nagpal
Omkar Krishna Shetty
Amit Bhardwaj
Mukesh Sharma
author_sort Poonam Siwach
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the antimicrobial effects of an 810-nanometer diode laser, utilizing or not utilizing toluidine blue as a photosensitizer, in the management of peri-implant mucositis. Settings and Design: The present study was carried out in 30 implant sites in 15 patients with peri-implant mucositis with a specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. 15 sites were treated utilizing a diode laser (control group) and 15 with photodynamic therapy (test group) in a split-mouth format. Materials and Methods: Samples were taken from the gingival sulcus with the help of plastic curettes from control and test sites both at baseline and at 3 months for microbiological analysis. Statistical Analysis Used: Shapiro-Wilk Test was used to check deviation from normality. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyse the two dependent groups. Results: Intragroup comparison was found to be statistically significant when compared at baseline and at 3 months in the photodynamic (P = 0.001) and diode laser groups (P = 0.001), respectively. No statistically significant reduction in bacterial count was found at baseline (P = 0.1) and at 3 months (P = 0.5) when the diode laser group and photodynamic group were compared with each other (intergroup). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that there is a definitive reduction in pathogenic bacteria with both interventions and PDT offers clinically visible benefits in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.
format Article
id doaj-art-438484444fcc446e90ea18696e941aed
institution Kabale University
issn 0972-4052
1998-4057
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
spelling doaj-art-438484444fcc446e90ea18696e941aed2025-02-06T06:22:46ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society0972-40521998-40572025-01-01251404510.4103/jips.jips_64_24Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri-implant mucositis – An in vivo studyPoonam SiwachReshu SananAbhishek NagpalOmkar Krishna ShettyAmit BhardwajMukesh SharmaAim: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the antimicrobial effects of an 810-nanometer diode laser, utilizing or not utilizing toluidine blue as a photosensitizer, in the management of peri-implant mucositis. Settings and Design: The present study was carried out in 30 implant sites in 15 patients with peri-implant mucositis with a specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. 15 sites were treated utilizing a diode laser (control group) and 15 with photodynamic therapy (test group) in a split-mouth format. Materials and Methods: Samples were taken from the gingival sulcus with the help of plastic curettes from control and test sites both at baseline and at 3 months for microbiological analysis. Statistical Analysis Used: Shapiro-Wilk Test was used to check deviation from normality. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyse the two dependent groups. Results: Intragroup comparison was found to be statistically significant when compared at baseline and at 3 months in the photodynamic (P = 0.001) and diode laser groups (P = 0.001), respectively. No statistically significant reduction in bacterial count was found at baseline (P = 0.1) and at 3 months (P = 0.5) when the diode laser group and photodynamic group were compared with each other (intergroup). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that there is a definitive reduction in pathogenic bacteria with both interventions and PDT offers clinically visible benefits in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jips.jips_64_24diode laserlow-level laser therapyperi-implant mucositisphotodynamic therapy
spellingShingle Poonam Siwach
Reshu Sanan
Abhishek Nagpal
Omkar Krishna Shetty
Amit Bhardwaj
Mukesh Sharma
Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri-implant mucositis – An in vivo study
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
diode laser
low-level laser therapy
peri-implant mucositis
photodynamic therapy
title Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri-implant mucositis – An in vivo study
title_full Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri-implant mucositis – An in vivo study
title_fullStr Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri-implant mucositis – An in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri-implant mucositis – An in vivo study
title_short Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri-implant mucositis – An in vivo study
title_sort comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri implant mucositis an in vivo study
topic diode laser
low-level laser therapy
peri-implant mucositis
photodynamic therapy
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jips.jips_64_24
work_keys_str_mv AT poonamsiwach comparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyof810nmdiodelaserandphotodynamictherapyinreducingmicrobialflorainpatientswithperiimplantmucositisaninvivostudy
AT reshusanan comparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyof810nmdiodelaserandphotodynamictherapyinreducingmicrobialflorainpatientswithperiimplantmucositisaninvivostudy
AT abhisheknagpal comparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyof810nmdiodelaserandphotodynamictherapyinreducingmicrobialflorainpatientswithperiimplantmucositisaninvivostudy
AT omkarkrishnashetty comparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyof810nmdiodelaserandphotodynamictherapyinreducingmicrobialflorainpatientswithperiimplantmucositisaninvivostudy
AT amitbhardwaj comparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyof810nmdiodelaserandphotodynamictherapyinreducingmicrobialflorainpatientswithperiimplantmucositisaninvivostudy
AT mukeshsharma comparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyof810nmdiodelaserandphotodynamictherapyinreducingmicrobialflorainpatientswithperiimplantmucositisaninvivostudy