From Biophysical Calculation to Financial Risk Assessment: Three Worlds of Accounting for Nature

The interactions between the economy and nature are little reflected in the management tools of capitalism. The impacts on the latter remain largely invisible to economic processes. This is the narrative behind the proposal to integrate nature into a central instrument of capitalism: accounting. How...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sylvain Maechler, Valérie Boisvert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Recherche & Régulation 2023-12-01
Series:Revue de la Régulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/23026
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577885114728448
author Sylvain Maechler
Valérie Boisvert
author_facet Sylvain Maechler
Valérie Boisvert
author_sort Sylvain Maechler
collection DOAJ
description The interactions between the economy and nature are little reflected in the management tools of capitalism. The impacts on the latter remain largely invisible to economic processes. This is the narrative behind the proposal to integrate nature into a central instrument of capitalism: accounting. However, nature accounting is shaped by a diversity of actors, practices, objectives and effects. Taking a chronological approach, we show how three successive approaches that we call “accounting worlds” have developed over time and coexist today. The first is public accounting expressed in biophysical, material and energy units, with the aim of exposing the exploitation and unequal exchange of natural resources as an extension of unbalanced trading relations. This was followed by the gradual development of natural capital monetary accounting projects, aimed at internalizing environmental externalities, initially at the national level and later extended to private accounting. A third and final project has recently emerged in connection with traditional accounting and financial standards. Its purpose is to measure the impact of nature and its degradation on the economic and hence financial performance of firms. Based on an analysis of these three worlds, we suggest that the growing influence of accounting thought and practices on nature, especially in their most recent forms, leads not so much to its commodification or financialization as to its invisibility or dilution in the logic of financial capitalist reproduction. Finally, we question the possible emergence of a unified regime of accounting for nature.
format Article
id doaj-art-437780f62dfc4711a6f50860dfdfabfd
institution Kabale University
issn 1957-7796
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Association Recherche & Régulation
record_format Article
series Revue de la Régulation
spelling doaj-art-437780f62dfc4711a6f50860dfdfabfd2025-01-30T14:27:06ZengAssociation Recherche & RégulationRevue de la Régulation1957-77962023-12-013510.4000/regulation.23026From Biophysical Calculation to Financial Risk Assessment: Three Worlds of Accounting for NatureSylvain MaechlerValérie BoisvertThe interactions between the economy and nature are little reflected in the management tools of capitalism. The impacts on the latter remain largely invisible to economic processes. This is the narrative behind the proposal to integrate nature into a central instrument of capitalism: accounting. However, nature accounting is shaped by a diversity of actors, practices, objectives and effects. Taking a chronological approach, we show how three successive approaches that we call “accounting worlds” have developed over time and coexist today. The first is public accounting expressed in biophysical, material and energy units, with the aim of exposing the exploitation and unequal exchange of natural resources as an extension of unbalanced trading relations. This was followed by the gradual development of natural capital monetary accounting projects, aimed at internalizing environmental externalities, initially at the national level and later extended to private accounting. A third and final project has recently emerged in connection with traditional accounting and financial standards. Its purpose is to measure the impact of nature and its degradation on the economic and hence financial performance of firms. Based on an analysis of these three worlds, we suggest that the growing influence of accounting thought and practices on nature, especially in their most recent forms, leads not so much to its commodification or financialization as to its invisibility or dilution in the logic of financial capitalist reproduction. Finally, we question the possible emergence of a unified regime of accounting for nature.https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/23026accountingnatural capitalequivalenceenvironmental governance
spellingShingle Sylvain Maechler
Valérie Boisvert
From Biophysical Calculation to Financial Risk Assessment: Three Worlds of Accounting for Nature
Revue de la Régulation
accounting
natural capital
equivalence
environmental governance
title From Biophysical Calculation to Financial Risk Assessment: Three Worlds of Accounting for Nature
title_full From Biophysical Calculation to Financial Risk Assessment: Three Worlds of Accounting for Nature
title_fullStr From Biophysical Calculation to Financial Risk Assessment: Three Worlds of Accounting for Nature
title_full_unstemmed From Biophysical Calculation to Financial Risk Assessment: Three Worlds of Accounting for Nature
title_short From Biophysical Calculation to Financial Risk Assessment: Three Worlds of Accounting for Nature
title_sort from biophysical calculation to financial risk assessment three worlds of accounting for nature
topic accounting
natural capital
equivalence
environmental governance
url https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/23026
work_keys_str_mv AT sylvainmaechler frombiophysicalcalculationtofinancialriskassessmentthreeworldsofaccountingfornature
AT valerieboisvert frombiophysicalcalculationtofinancialriskassessmentthreeworldsofaccountingfornature