A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Approaches to EAP Teaching to Postgraduate Students

The present study aims to explore the role of explicit and implicit approaches in developing pragmatic competence in postgraduate students as part of the Foreign Language course. 32 students were divided into two groups depending on the type of teaching approach for six weeks of instruction. Researc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O. A. Boginskaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow Polytechnic University 2024-03-01
Series:Высшее образование в России
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4810
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832574363647344640
author O. A. Boginskaya
author_facet O. A. Boginskaya
author_sort O. A. Boginskaya
collection DOAJ
description The present study aims to explore the role of explicit and implicit approaches in developing pragmatic competence in postgraduate students as part of the Foreign Language course. 32 students were divided into two groups depending on the type of teaching approach for six weeks of instruction. Research proposals written by each group after the interventions were examined with the aim of comparing the employment of pragmatic features such as stance-taking resources and their frequencies. In order to investigate the effects of stance-taking instruction, this study adopted a combination of quantitative and interpretative analysis methods. The results revealed significant differences in the use of stance resources by the postgraduate students exposed to explicit vs implicit instruction. In terms of compliance with the academic writing norms, the explicit instruction was found to be more effective than the implicit one. The analysis found that while the explicit group tended to mitigate their claims and hide authorial presence, the students exposed to the implicit instruction expressed stronger commitments to propositional content and showed writer visibility in the text, which considers to be inappropriate in English-language academic writing. The findings point to important considerations for EAP teaching and future research into academic discourse and contribute to previous studies of the benefits of instruction in the development of pragmatic competence. The results may be employed by curriculum designers to create materials for L2 writers and EAP instructors in their teaching practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-42d1fb1980264b9aa6453e5e24be9fe5
institution Kabale University
issn 0869-3617
2072-0459
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Moscow Polytechnic University
record_format Article
series Высшее образование в России
spelling doaj-art-42d1fb1980264b9aa6453e5e24be9fe52025-02-01T13:14:32ZengMoscow Polytechnic UniversityВысшее образование в России0869-36172072-04592024-03-0133214816110.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-2-148-1612453A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Approaches to EAP Teaching to Postgraduate StudentsO. A. Boginskaya0Irkutsk National Research Technical UniversityThe present study aims to explore the role of explicit and implicit approaches in developing pragmatic competence in postgraduate students as part of the Foreign Language course. 32 students were divided into two groups depending on the type of teaching approach for six weeks of instruction. Research proposals written by each group after the interventions were examined with the aim of comparing the employment of pragmatic features such as stance-taking resources and their frequencies. In order to investigate the effects of stance-taking instruction, this study adopted a combination of quantitative and interpretative analysis methods. The results revealed significant differences in the use of stance resources by the postgraduate students exposed to explicit vs implicit instruction. In terms of compliance with the academic writing norms, the explicit instruction was found to be more effective than the implicit one. The analysis found that while the explicit group tended to mitigate their claims and hide authorial presence, the students exposed to the implicit instruction expressed stronger commitments to propositional content and showed writer visibility in the text, which considers to be inappropriate in English-language academic writing. The findings point to important considerations for EAP teaching and future research into academic discourse and contribute to previous studies of the benefits of instruction in the development of pragmatic competence. The results may be employed by curriculum designers to create materials for L2 writers and EAP instructors in their teaching practice.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4810academic writingexplicit teachingimplicit teachingstance-takingpostgraduate student
spellingShingle O. A. Boginskaya
A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Approaches to EAP Teaching to Postgraduate Students
Высшее образование в России
academic writing
explicit teaching
implicit teaching
stance-taking
postgraduate student
title A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Approaches to EAP Teaching to Postgraduate Students
title_full A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Approaches to EAP Teaching to Postgraduate Students
title_fullStr A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Approaches to EAP Teaching to Postgraduate Students
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Approaches to EAP Teaching to Postgraduate Students
title_short A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Approaches to EAP Teaching to Postgraduate Students
title_sort comparison of explicit and implicit approaches to eap teaching to postgraduate students
topic academic writing
explicit teaching
implicit teaching
stance-taking
postgraduate student
url https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4810
work_keys_str_mv AT oaboginskaya acomparisonofexplicitandimplicitapproachestoeapteachingtopostgraduatestudents
AT oaboginskaya comparisonofexplicitandimplicitapproachestoeapteachingtopostgraduatestudents