Dosimetry and Comparison between Different CT Protocols (Low Dose, Ultralow Dose, and Conventional CT) for Lung Nodules’ Detection in a Phantom
Background. The effects of dose reduction in lung nodule detection need better understanding. Purpose. To compare the detection rate of simulated lung nodules in a chest phantom using different computed tomography protocols, low dose (LD), ultralow dose (ULD), and conventional (CCT), and to quantify...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Radiology Research and Practice |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6667779 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832561279691128832 |
|---|---|
| author | Cleverson Alex Leitão Gabriel Lucca de Oliveira Salvador Priscilla Tazoniero Danny Warszawiak Cristian Saievicz Rosangela Requi Jakubiak Dante Luiz Escuissato |
| author_facet | Cleverson Alex Leitão Gabriel Lucca de Oliveira Salvador Priscilla Tazoniero Danny Warszawiak Cristian Saievicz Rosangela Requi Jakubiak Dante Luiz Escuissato |
| author_sort | Cleverson Alex Leitão |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background. The effects of dose reduction in lung nodule detection need better understanding. Purpose. To compare the detection rate of simulated lung nodules in a chest phantom using different computed tomography protocols, low dose (LD), ultralow dose (ULD), and conventional (CCT), and to quantify their respective amount of radiation. Materials and Methods. A chest phantom containing 93 simulated lung nodules was scanned using five different protocols: ULD (80 kVp/30 mA), LD A (120 kVp/20 mA), LD B (100 kVp/30 mA), LD C (120 kVp/30 mA), and CCT (120 kVp/automatic mA). Four chest radiologists analyzed a selected image from each protocol and registered in diagrams the nodules they detected. Kruskal–Wallis and McNemar’s tests were performed to determine the difference in nodule detection. Equivalent doses were estimated by placing thermoluminescent dosimeters on the surface and inside the phantom. Results. There was no significant difference in lung nodules’ detection when comparing ULD and LD protocols (p=0.208 to p=1.000), but there was a significant difference when comparing each one of those against CCT (p<0.001). The detection rate of nodules with CT attenuation values lower than −600 HU was also different when comparing all protocols against CCT (p<0.001 to p=0.007). There was at least moderate agreement between observers in all protocols (κ-value >0.41). Equivalent dose values ranged from 0.5 to 9 mSv. Conclusion. There is no significant difference in simulated lung nodules’ detection when comparing ULD and LD protocols, but both differ from CCT, especially when considering lower-attenuating nodules. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-42c7aeb59d0a494d88ea4e44b34c2be0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-1941 2090-195X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Radiology Research and Practice |
| spelling | doaj-art-42c7aeb59d0a494d88ea4e44b34c2be02025-02-03T01:25:26ZengWileyRadiology Research and Practice2090-19412090-195X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/66677796667779Dosimetry and Comparison between Different CT Protocols (Low Dose, Ultralow Dose, and Conventional CT) for Lung Nodules’ Detection in a PhantomCleverson Alex Leitão0Gabriel Lucca de Oliveira Salvador1Priscilla Tazoniero2Danny Warszawiak3Cristian Saievicz4Rosangela Requi Jakubiak5Dante Luiz Escuissato6Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, BrazilDepartment of Radiology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, BrazilDepartment of Radiology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, BrazilDepartment of Radiology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, BrazilDepartment of Radiology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, BrazilUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, BrazilDepartment of Radiology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, BrazilBackground. The effects of dose reduction in lung nodule detection need better understanding. Purpose. To compare the detection rate of simulated lung nodules in a chest phantom using different computed tomography protocols, low dose (LD), ultralow dose (ULD), and conventional (CCT), and to quantify their respective amount of radiation. Materials and Methods. A chest phantom containing 93 simulated lung nodules was scanned using five different protocols: ULD (80 kVp/30 mA), LD A (120 kVp/20 mA), LD B (100 kVp/30 mA), LD C (120 kVp/30 mA), and CCT (120 kVp/automatic mA). Four chest radiologists analyzed a selected image from each protocol and registered in diagrams the nodules they detected. Kruskal–Wallis and McNemar’s tests were performed to determine the difference in nodule detection. Equivalent doses were estimated by placing thermoluminescent dosimeters on the surface and inside the phantom. Results. There was no significant difference in lung nodules’ detection when comparing ULD and LD protocols (p=0.208 to p=1.000), but there was a significant difference when comparing each one of those against CCT (p<0.001). The detection rate of nodules with CT attenuation values lower than −600 HU was also different when comparing all protocols against CCT (p<0.001 to p=0.007). There was at least moderate agreement between observers in all protocols (κ-value >0.41). Equivalent dose values ranged from 0.5 to 9 mSv. Conclusion. There is no significant difference in simulated lung nodules’ detection when comparing ULD and LD protocols, but both differ from CCT, especially when considering lower-attenuating nodules.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6667779 |
| spellingShingle | Cleverson Alex Leitão Gabriel Lucca de Oliveira Salvador Priscilla Tazoniero Danny Warszawiak Cristian Saievicz Rosangela Requi Jakubiak Dante Luiz Escuissato Dosimetry and Comparison between Different CT Protocols (Low Dose, Ultralow Dose, and Conventional CT) for Lung Nodules’ Detection in a Phantom Radiology Research and Practice |
| title | Dosimetry and Comparison between Different CT Protocols (Low Dose, Ultralow Dose, and Conventional CT) for Lung Nodules’ Detection in a Phantom |
| title_full | Dosimetry and Comparison between Different CT Protocols (Low Dose, Ultralow Dose, and Conventional CT) for Lung Nodules’ Detection in a Phantom |
| title_fullStr | Dosimetry and Comparison between Different CT Protocols (Low Dose, Ultralow Dose, and Conventional CT) for Lung Nodules’ Detection in a Phantom |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetry and Comparison between Different CT Protocols (Low Dose, Ultralow Dose, and Conventional CT) for Lung Nodules’ Detection in a Phantom |
| title_short | Dosimetry and Comparison between Different CT Protocols (Low Dose, Ultralow Dose, and Conventional CT) for Lung Nodules’ Detection in a Phantom |
| title_sort | dosimetry and comparison between different ct protocols low dose ultralow dose and conventional ct for lung nodules detection in a phantom |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6667779 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cleversonalexleitao dosimetryandcomparisonbetweendifferentctprotocolslowdoseultralowdoseandconventionalctforlungnodulesdetectioninaphantom AT gabrielluccadeoliveirasalvador dosimetryandcomparisonbetweendifferentctprotocolslowdoseultralowdoseandconventionalctforlungnodulesdetectioninaphantom AT priscillatazoniero dosimetryandcomparisonbetweendifferentctprotocolslowdoseultralowdoseandconventionalctforlungnodulesdetectioninaphantom AT dannywarszawiak dosimetryandcomparisonbetweendifferentctprotocolslowdoseultralowdoseandconventionalctforlungnodulesdetectioninaphantom AT cristiansaievicz dosimetryandcomparisonbetweendifferentctprotocolslowdoseultralowdoseandconventionalctforlungnodulesdetectioninaphantom AT rosangelarequijakubiak dosimetryandcomparisonbetweendifferentctprotocolslowdoseultralowdoseandconventionalctforlungnodulesdetectioninaphantom AT danteluizescuissato dosimetryandcomparisonbetweendifferentctprotocolslowdoseultralowdoseandconventionalctforlungnodulesdetectioninaphantom |